[iwar] Historical posting
From: Fred Cohen
From: fc@all.net
To: iwar@onelist.com
Mon, Jan 1, 1999
fc Mon Jan 1, 1999
Received: (from fc@localhost) by all.net (8.9.3/8.7.3) id FAA15269 for iwar@onelist.com; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 05:21:43 -0700
To: iwar@onelist.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: list iwar@egroups.com; contact iwar-owner@egroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@egroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe:
Date: Mon, Jan 1, 1999
From: Fred Cohen
Reply-To: iwar@egroups.com
Subject: [iwar] Historical posting
Ref Chris's comments,
Ok somebody may take this wrong but being as how I have worked for
Information Operations for 15 years I figured I would take a stab at this.
Although a rice bowl of topics(operations) they are all inherently the same.
When I first started there was little Computer Network Attack/Defence, or to
the point we were not that aware of it due to the fact our networks were not
really out there for the real world to worry about.
Today that has changed and we all zip along on what usually equates to 2
little wires that you know are plugged into the back of a computer and a
modem connected somewhere in amongst the maze of bus cables and power wires.
Now we look at most parts of the information (Electronic Warfare, Deception,
OPSEC, Computer Network Attack/Defence) as a total package in Information
Operations Protection. Each one is an entity which somehow plugs into the
rest, why have one as a part of the group without the other. Hence the last
part of IO which is the Protection. So they must sychronize into a one total
package or how can you be either on the offence or defence if you don't have
one without the other.
Well that is it for now, if someone wants the Flame on, so be it.
Glenn R Williamson
Glenn_Williamson@o...
>From: "Chris Calvert" calvertc@m...
>
>
>I am interested in peoples opinions relating to the other disciplines
>usually associated with Information Operations. Are Electronic Warfare,
>Psychological Operations, Deception, Destruction, OPSEC, Computer Network
>Attack & Defense really sychronizable into Information Operations? How must
>the command and control of these disciplines be integrated? Ignoring the
>fact
>that this is a "Rice Bowl" issue now and not a doctrinal one...
>
>>------------------
>http://all.net/