RE: [iwar] News
From: Devlon Duthie
From: that_duthie_guy@hotmail.com
To: iwar@egroups.com
Tue, 20 Jun 2000 17:31:05 CST
fc Tue Jun 20 16:31:14 2000
Received: from 207.222.214.225
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0)
for fc@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 20 Jun 2000 16:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by multi33.netcomi.com for fc
(with Netcom Interactive pop3d (v1.21.1 1998/05/07) Tue Jun 20 23:31:07 2000)
X-From_: sentto-279987-419-961543866-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com Tue Jun 20 18:31:02 2000
Received: from c3.egroups.com (c3.egroups.com [207.138.41.143]) by multi33.netcomi.com (8.8.5/8.7.4) with SMTP id SAA07855 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 18:31:02 -0500
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-419-961543866-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.10.38] by c3.egroups.com with NNFMP; 20 Jun 2000 23:31:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 11943 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2000 23:31:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 20 Jun 2000 23:31:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.236.149) by mta1 with SMTP; 20 Jun 2000 23:31:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 27623 invoked by uid 0); 20 Jun 2000 23:31:05 -0000
Message-ID: <20000620233105.27622.qmail@hotmail.com>
Received: from 208.201.90.105 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 16:31:05 PDT
X-Originating-IP: [208.201.90.105]
To: iwar@egroups.com
From: "Devlon Duthie"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: list iwar@egroups.com; contact iwar-owner@egroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@egroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe:
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 17:31:05 CST
Reply-To: iwar@egroups.com
Subject: RE: [iwar] News
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
My momma always said....ignorance is not an excuse...
So before we start blaming anyone....who twisted your arm to buy M$ product?
Or anyone for that matter....alternatives are too tough?...then learn....
I didn't know how to drive..so I drove into that other car...damn
manufacturers!!
EDUCATION! That's the bottom line.
sorry...had to get that out. Not by any strech of the imagination am I
defending M$, just pointing out the root of the problem..
>From: "Junkmail Rosenberger"
>Reply-To: iwar@egroups.com
>To: "iwar"
>Subject: RE: [iwar] News
>Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 16:31:39 -0500
>
> >>why nobody is sueing Microsoft for implementing a
> >>"feature" like the execution of e-mail attached VB
> >>scripts, that has no practical application at all
> >>for any user (apart the one of implementing a
> >>computer virus). As bad as the effects of this
> >>virus were, I think that at least 50% of fault goes
> >>to MS.
>
>You make it sound like your first line of defense is a Microsoft product.
>Why
>not instead sue antivirus vendors for failing to protect you?
>
>Ask yourself why popular antivirus software DOESN'T check for the years-old
>".???.???" filename trick. How much effort does it take to look for two
>periods in the last eight characters of a filename? Only evil attachments
>use
>it. Checking for it would have saved the world (before the fact!) from
>ILoveYou, NewLove, and now Stages.
>
>Rob Rosenberger, webmaster
>Computer Virus Myths home page
>http://www.kumite.com/myths
>U.S. (319) 646-2800
>
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
STEALS AND DEALS! Cheapest prices on airfare, new cars, insurance, maids,
contractors, collectibles, more. Get exactly what you want at the lowest
price. New FREE service!
http://click.egroups.com/1/5746/7/_/595019/_/961543866/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------
http://all.net/