RE: [iwar] News


From: Leo, Ross
To: 'iwar@egroups.com'
From: Ross.Leo@csoconline.com
To: iwar@egroups.com

Mon, 17 Apr 2000 08:15:00 -0500


fc  Mon Apr 17 06:22:14 2000
Received: from 207.222.214.225
	by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0)
	for fc@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 17 Apr 2000 06:22:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by multi33.netcomi.com for fc
 (with Netcom Interactive pop3d (v1.21.1 1998/05/07) Mon Apr 17 13:22:08 2000)
X-From_: sentto-279987-298-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com  Mon Apr 17 08:21:37 2000
Received: from hj.egroups.com (hj.egroups.com [208.50.144.90]) by multi33.netcomi.com (8.8.5/8.7.4) with SMTP id IAA10932 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 08:21:37 -0500
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-298-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.10.37] by hj.egroups.com with NNFMP; 17 Apr 2000 13:21:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 1152 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2000 13:15:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 17 Apr 2000 13:15:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO q8.egroups.com) (10.1.2.31) by mta1 with SMTP; 17 Apr 2000 13:15:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 32724 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2000 13:15:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO csoc-fire1.csoconline.com) (140.169.2.142) by mx3.egroups.com with SMTP; 17 Apr 2000 13:15:05 -0000
Received: from [140.169.2.142] by csoc-fire1.csoconline.com via smtpd (for mx3.egroups.com [207.138.41.140]) with SMTP; 17 Apr 2000 13:15:05 UT
Received: by csoc-mail-imc.csoconline.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 08:14:14 -0500
Message-ID: <10F6484D1E7FD3119B8C00902727A34501BE4A18@csoc-mail-box.csoconline.com>
To: "'iwar@egroups.com'" 
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: list iwar@egroups.com; contact iwar-owner@egroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@egroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: 
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 08:15:00 -0500
X-eGroups-From: "Leo, Ross" 
From: "Leo, Ross" 
Reply-To: iwar@egroups.com
Subject: RE: [iwar] News  
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I did say in a previous note that I do not accept the premise of the "white
hat hacker".  The circulated newsbite about Max Butler tends to substantiate
my position.  Yes I realise that the jury is still out (he is not convicted
yet).  Nevertheless, that fact that he is up on charges casts reasonable
doubt over the "trustability" of this type of practitioner.
 
As I said then, the hiring of a "white hat hacker" or a reformed hacker is a
risk I can avoid, and so I do.  It is never a matter of being sure someone
is a crook or not - it is a matter of whether they prove themselves to be
completely trustworthy or not.  It is the element of uncertainty that
dictates my course toward assuming less risk, and avoiding unnecessary ones.
 
Ross A. Leo

Ross A. Leo, CISSP, CBCP
Director, Information Assurance & Security
CSOC Houston
Voice:  281.853.3516
Fax:      281.853.3140











[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avoid the lines and visit avis.com for quick and easy online 
reservations. Enjoy a compact car nationwide for only $29 a day! 
Click here for more details.
http://click.egroups.com/1/3011/7/_/595019/_/955977702/
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------
http://all.net/