RE: [iwar] Information Warfare Explained


From:
From: deant@stsi.net
To: iwar@egroups.com

Tue, 22 Aug 2000 16:18:49 -0400


fc  Tue Aug 22 13:28:16 2000
Received: from 207.222.214.225
	by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0)
	for fc@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 22 Aug 2000 13:28:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by multi33.netcomi.com for fc
 (with Netcom Interactive pop3d (v1.21.1 1998/05/07) Tue Aug 22 20:28:10 2000)
X-From_: sentto-279987-499-966976023-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com  Tue Aug 22 15:27:31 2000
Received: from fj.egroups.com (fj.egroups.com [208.50.99.207]) by multi33.netcomi.com (8.8.5/8.7.4) with SMTP id PAA21519 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 15:27:31 -0500
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-499-966976023-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.10.35] by fj.egroups.com with NNFMP; 22 Aug 2000 20:27:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 1696 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2000 20:27:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 22 Aug 2000 20:27:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO virtual.stsi.net) (208.236.212.233) by mta1 with SMTP; 22 Aug 2000 20:27:02 -0000
Received: from aeonflux (aeonflux.stsi.net [208.236.212.177]) by virtual.stsi.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id e7MKR0I24597 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 16:27:01 -0400 (EDT)
To: iwar@egroups.com
Message-ID: <39A2A7E9.25378.1280437@localhost>
Priority: normal
X-PM-Encryptor: QDPGP, 4
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
From: deant@stsi.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: list iwar@egroups.com; contact iwar-owner@egroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@egroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: 
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 16:18:49 -0400
Reply-To: iwar@egroups.com
Subject: RE: [iwar] Information Warfare Explained
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Salutations fellow i-war list members,

Ozair:
"...most of the answers I got were of the military/governmental types 
with least interest on b2b side.  Somehow I feel that in the case of 
Information Warfare Corporations would more interested."

I wonder why.  In an era of financial feudalism where information is 
the coin of the realm, corporate entities are the equivalent of 
citystates.  When examples such as the inner circle of Micro$oft 
being required to recite relevant passages from Sun Tzu's "Ancient 
Art of War" abound in modern corporate culture, it appears that 
they think of them selves in the same fashion.  Most corporate 
resources not directly related to the production of product are 
devoted to the information warchest.  In many cases the product 
itself is information.  What with press releases, reverse engineering, 
commercials, 'spin' control, corporate espionage, infomercials, 
attempts to subvert ineffectual property laws  etc. ad nauseam.  You 
would think that the corporations would not only have an interest but 
be seasoned veterans in the i-war.
 
Tony:
"Of all liberties, the ability to freely obtain 'information' is paramount."

I tend to disagree with this.  The control of information access is the 
basis for most interaction in society.  By restricting access to 
information members of the governance, shaman, scientist, or 
common man differentiate individuals and groups one from another. 

Tony:
"Deliberate activity accomplished through manipulation or 
neutralization of information or information systems, to destroy, 
disable, subvert, or otherwise destabilize critical defensive or 
economic resources, physical or otherwise."

Well said sir. This definition does not limit the scope of information 
warfare to only include acts committed by for or against sovereign 
nations.  Warfare like beauty is in the eye of the beholder.  The 
actions of Mandela and Kaczynski, both of whom considered 
themselves warriors, are considered very different by others in the 
society.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.2 -- QDPGP 2.61a
Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html

iQA/AwUBOaLgKKeK/MFQcuatEQJjHACeK9a4lNUn86KAmdhca0joW2ZLeawAn11N
K8fyckI+6qDhzpINrRPhwqWV
=xgDC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously.
-- Hubert Humphrey

T. Dean Tate UNIX SysAdmin    -o)
deant@stsi.net                /\\
SouthNet TeleComm            _\_V

---------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------
http://all.net/