RE: [iwar] RE: Cyberterror should be int'l crime?


From: Michael Wilson
To: 'iwar@egroups.com'
From: partners@7pillars.com
To: iwar@egroups.com

Tue, 14 Nov 2000 09:23:07 -0800 (PST)


fc  Tue Nov 14 09:24:13 2000
Received: from 207.222.214.225
	by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0)
	for fc@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 14 Nov 2000 09:24:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by multi33.netcomi.com for fc
 (with Netcom Interactive pop3d (v1.21.1 1998/05/07) Tue Nov 14 17:24:08 2000)
X-From_: partners@7pillars.com  Tue Nov 14 11:23:08 2000
Received: from fk.egroups.com ([64.211.240.232]) by multi33.netcomi.com (8.8.5/8.7.4) with SMTP id LAA18141 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 11:23:07 -0600
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-753-974222590-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.4.54] by fk.egroups.com with NNFMP; 14 Nov 2000 17:23:11 -0000
X-Sender: partners@7pillars.com
X-Apparently-To: iwar@egroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-6_2_1); 14 Nov 2000 17:23:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 95329 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2000 17:23:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 14 Nov 2000 17:23:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sirius.infonex.com) (216.34.245.2) by mta3 with SMTP; 14 Nov 2000 18:24:15 -0000
Received: from localhost (partners@localhost) by sirius.infonex.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA07084 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 09:23:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Authentication-Warning: sirius.infonex.com: partners owned process doing -bs
X-Sender: partners@sirius.infonex.com
To: "'iwar@egroups.com'" 
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: 
From: Michael Wilson 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: list iwar@egroups.com; contact iwar-owner@egroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@egroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: 
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 09:23:07 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: iwar@egroups.com
Subject: RE: [iwar] RE: Cyberterror should be int'l crime?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I believe this issue needs a great deal more consideration.  Convictions make
convicts, and criminalization drives the amateur hacker into the realm of the
professional, because society burns that bridge for them.

To speak freely, since my background covers a considerably wider scope than
information operations (we're a PMC, a professional military company, and so
guerrilla warfare and terrorism are inside our 'core competence'), once the
'line' is drawn, you don't give the individuals now on the other side much of a
choice.  I highly recommend to anyone that's interested that they go pull Bruce
Hoffman's RAND study on anti-terror (as opposed to counter-terror) measures,
including how amnesty actions have allowed retirement of entire operational
groups.  I think the expansive view of criminalization, as well as
de-politicization (and thus divorcing any actions of legitimacy), are ill
thought out, poorly executed, and create a self-fulfilling situation:  you
leave them nowhere to go but 'down.'

Those interested in motivations might find the 'know your adversary' section of
my intel course of interest:
http://www.7pillars.com/IntelligenceCourse.pdf

Michael Wilson


On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, David Alexander wrote:

> I agree that the comparison was badly put, and not very apposite. However,
> while not all hacking is the same as terrorism, some is, and more of it may
> become so. The law needs to be in place to allow people to be prosecuted if
> it is appropriate to do so.
>  
> We all know what a joke it has been trying to prosecute people for hacking
> with the wholly inadequate laws that have existed to date within nations,
> and across borders the situation is even worse. I think that laws are
> required and required now.
>  
> just my 2c.
>  
> 
> David Alexander
> Project Manager & Information Security Consultant
> Qualified BS7799 Lead Auditor
> Triskele Ltd.
> 
> Office  01491 833280
> Mobile 0780 308 3130
> 
> 
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Rosenberger [mailto:junkmail@kumite.com]
> Sent: 14 November 2000 16:55
> To: iwar mailing list
> Subject: [iwar] RE: Cyberterror should be int'l crime?
> 
> 
> >>Cyberterror Should Be Int'l Crime - Israeli Minister
> 
> Put yourself in the shoes of an Israeli or Palestinian whose son died in
> street fighting.  How would *you* feel if a bureaucrat compared your loss to
> a
> bad AOL connection?
> 
> Hacking isn't the same as terrorism, folks.  Just ask any USS Cole sailor on
> eternal patrol.  'Nuff said.
> 
> Rob Rosenberger, Vmyths.com editor
> Truth about computer virus myths & hoaxes
> http://www.Vmyths.com  
> 
> 
> 
> eGroups Sponsor	
>   
> 
>  
>  gif> 
> 
> ------------------
> http://all.net/   
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------
> http://all.net/
> 


-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9699/5/_/595019/_/974222591/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

------------------
http://all.net/