Re: [iwar] Digest Number 251
From: Fred Cohen
From: fc@all.net
To: iwar@egroups.com
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 07:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
fc Wed Oct 18 07:45:15 2000
Received: from 207.222.214.225
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0)
for fc@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 18 Oct 2000 07:45:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by multi33.netcomi.com for fc
(with Netcom Interactive pop3d (v1.21.1 1998/05/07) Wed Oct 18 14:45:09 2000)
X-From_: sentto-279987-544-971880241-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com Wed Oct 18 09:44:21 2000
Received: from mk.egroups.com (mk.egroups.com [208.50.144.76]) by multi33.netcomi.com (8.8.5/8.7.4) with SMTP id JAA08125 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 09:44:21 -0500
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-544-971880241-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.10.37] by mk.egroups.com with NNFMP; 18 Oct 2000 14:44:25 -0000
X-Sender: fc@all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@egroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-6_1_0); 18 Oct 2000 14:44:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 19539 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2000 14:44:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 18 Oct 2000 14:44:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO all.net) (24.1.84.100) by mta2 with SMTP; 18 Oct 2000 14:44:00 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by all.net (8.9.3/8.7.3) id HAA22090 for iwar@egroups.com; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 07:44:00 -0700
Message-Id: <200010181444.HAA22090@all.net>
To: iwar@egroups.com
In-Reply-To: <0bc3b53361412a0EMAIL002@email002> from "DrewSchaefer@ftnetwork.com" at Oct 18, 2000 07:14:41 AM
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
From: Fred Cohen
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: list iwar@egroups.com; contact iwar-owner@egroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@egroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe:
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 07:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: iwar@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [iwar] Digest Number 251
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Per the message sent by DrewSchaefer@ftnetwork.com:
> Back to our point. IF an EMP bomb is somehow built and delivered by
> some UNNAMED country with lots of sand against some advanced, IT-dense
> urban area in Europe or USA, with a capacity to take out ALL EM
> communications (TV, radio, electrical grids, Newspaper [having lost its
> capacity to create newsprint, now virtually all done electronically],
> Phone, Internet and cellular, [forgive me if this list seems ignorant, I
> am still searching best sources]), a hugely devastating effect would be
> rendered against populations that prior, were 'immunized' by the Rules
> of War against such involvement.
Read nuclear weapon. If you anaylze it, you may find that in order to
build this EMP bomb that takes out 'ALL EM communications' over any
significant area (on the magnitude of a city) you will need so much
energy that only a nuclear weapon can achieve it in a deliverable
package.
FC
-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
Dial 1-800-555-TELL -- You Won't Believe Your Ears!
For more details, click here:
http://click.egroups.com/1/9537/14/_/595019/_/971880241/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
------------------
http://all.net/