Re: [iwar] FW: (ai) Cell Phone Tracking Device Coming Soon (fwd)
From: Tony Bartoletti
From: azb@llnl.gov
To: iwar@egroups.com
Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:51:59 -0700
fc Tue Oct 31 16:51:17 2000
Received: from 207.222.214.225
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0)
for fc@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:51:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by multi33.netcomi.com for fc
(with Netcom Interactive pop3d (v1.21.1 1998/05/07) Wed Nov 1 00:51:11 2000)
X-From_: azb@llnl.gov Tue Oct 31 18:50:24 2000
Received: from mu.egroups.com (mu.egroups.com [208.50.99.218]) by multi33.netcomi.com (8.8.5/8.7.4) with SMTP id SAA20401 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 18:50:15 -0600
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-721-973039813-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.10.37] by mu.egroups.com with NNFMP; 01 Nov 2000 00:50:13 -0000
X-Sender: azb@llnl.gov
X-Apparently-To: iwar@egroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-6_2_1); 1 Nov 2000 00:50:12 -0000
Received: (qmail 24892 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2000 00:50:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 1 Nov 2000 00:50:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO poptop.llnl.gov) (128.115.41.70) by mta3 with SMTP; 1 Nov 2000 00:50:11 -0000
Received: from catalyst (catalyst.llnl.gov [128.115.222.68]) by poptop.llnl.gov (8.8.8/LLNL-3.0.2/pop.llnl.gov-5.1) with ESMTP id QAA21464 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:50:10 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <4.2.2.20001031164714.00a93250@poptop.llnl.gov>
X-Sender: e048786@poptop.llnl.gov
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2
To: iwar@egroups.com
In-Reply-To: <200010312339.PAA26460@all.net>
From: Tony Bartoletti
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: list iwar@egroups.com; contact iwar-owner@egroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@egroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe:
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:51:59 -0700
Reply-To: iwar@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [iwar] FW: (ai) Cell Phone Tracking Device Coming Soon (fwd)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>Cell phones, handheld devices, even car navigation systems will soon have
>detailed tracking abilities, if they do not already. Services could begin
>appearing within a year or so.
>
>Much of the drive will come from a federal law that requires cell phones to
>identify callers' locations to speed 911 emergency responses. If the
>industry has to install expensive equipment anyway, why not use it also to
>make
>money?
A "sane" alternative would include a toggle:
1. Release location ALWAYS
2. Release location ONLY if "911" call is made.
This would guarantee that any 911 call allows location tracing, while
giving the individual some latitude in other circumstances.
WAY too much to expect from the industry, of course :(
___tony___
Tony Bartoletti 925-422-3881
Information Operations, Warfare and Assurance Center
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Livermore, CA 94551-9900
-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9699/14/_/595019/_/973039813/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
------------------
http://all.net/