Re: [iwar] news
From: Tony Bartoletti
From: azb@llnl.gov
To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Mon, 05 Feb 2001 11:48:31 -0800
fc Mon Feb 5 11:42:09 2001
Received: from 207.222.214.225
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0)
for fc@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 05 Feb 2001 11:42:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by multi33.netcomi.com for fc
(with Netcom Interactive pop3d (v1.21.1 1998/05/07) Mon Feb 5 19:42:03 2001)
X-From_: azb@llnl.gov Mon Feb 5 13:41:20 2001
Received: from ej.egroups.com ([64.211.240.230])
by multi33.netcomi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA05563
for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 13:41:18 -0600
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-906-981402080-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.4.54] by ej.egroups.com with NNFMP; 05 Feb 2001 19:41:22 -0000
X-Sender: azb@llnl.gov
X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_2_1); 5 Feb 2001 19:41:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 6884 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2001 19:41:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 5 Feb 2001 19:41:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp-1.llnl.gov) (128.115.250.81) by mta3 with SMTP; 5 Feb 2001 20:42:23 -0000
Received: from poptop.llnl.gov (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-1.llnl.gov (8.9.3/8.9.3/LLNL-gateway-1.0) with ESMTP id LAA18887 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:41:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from catalyst (catalyst.llnl.gov [128.115.222.68]) by poptop.llnl.gov (8.8.8/LLNL-3.0.2/pop.llnl.gov-5.1) with ESMTP id LAA22943 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:41:12 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <4.2.2.20010205113327.00a76c70@poptop.llnl.gov>
X-Sender: e048786@poptop.llnl.gov
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2
To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
In-Reply-To: <200102051425.GAA28716@all.net>
From: Tony Bartoletti
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe:
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 11:48:31 -0800
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [iwar] news
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
At 06:25 AM 2/5/01 -0800, you wrote:
>NEW CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE AGENCY PROPOSED
>
>The U.S. Commission on National Security last Wednesday urged the
>Bush administration to create the National Homeland Security Agency
>(NHSA)
[snip]
>The commission report "recommends a new National Homeland Security
>Agency to consolidate and refine the missions of the nearly two dozen
>disparate departments and agencies that have a role in U.S. homeland
>security today," said commission Executive Director Charles Boyd, a
>former U.S. Air Force general.
[snip] ...
"Homeland"? "Homeland?"
I was always under the impression that DoD, NSA, CIA, and other "National
Security" regimes existed to protect and defend the citizens, the businesses,
their properties and the country's general infrastructure.
Perhaps their role was only to protect "government" (i.e., themselves) and
now, realizing their dependency upon "the people", they discover the need
for a "homeland" defense (sigh.)
I suppose that so many "home-grown" efforts in emerging (cyber)infrastructure
protection have sprung up to fill the void, rather than try to absorb them
into existing defense regimes, the plan is to place a coordinating umbrella
over them.
___tony___
Tony Bartoletti 925-422-3881
Information Operations, Warfare and Assurance Center
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Livermore, CA 94551-9900
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/1/_/595019/_/981402081/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
------------------
http://all.net/