Return-Path: <sentto-279987-1173-988649664-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:55:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 10134 invoked by uid 510); 30 Apr 2001 15:55:36 -0000 Received: from c3.egroups.com (208.50.99.225) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 30 Apr 2001 15:55:36 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-1173-988649664-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.4.54] by c3.egroups.com with NNFMP; 30 Apr 2001 16:54:25 -0000 X-Sender: azb@llnl.gov X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 30 Apr 2001 16:54:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 20982 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2001 16:54:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 30 Apr 2001 16:54:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp-2.llnl.gov) (128.115.250.82) by mta1 with SMTP; 30 Apr 2001 16:54:23 -0000 Received: from poptop.llnl.gov (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-2.llnl.gov (8.9.3/8.9.3/LLNL-gateway-1.0) with ESMTP id JAA02135 for <iwar@yahoogroups.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:54:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from catalyst.llnl.gov (catalyst.llnl.gov [128.115.222.68]) by poptop.llnl.gov (8.8.8/LLNL-3.0.2/pop.llnl.gov-5.1) with ESMTP id JAA08050 for <iwar@yahoogroups.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:54:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010430094358.00b1a860@poptop.llnl.gov> X-Sender: e048786@poptop.llnl.gov X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 To: iwar@yahoogroups.com In-Reply-To: <MABBKMMMPGCGIIBCIGGHEEGNCKAA.ozair_rasheed@geocities.com> References: <200104301526.IAA02298@all.net> From: Tony Bartoletti <azb@llnl.gov> Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:59:09 -0700 Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [iwar] [anti-nato] NAVY EMAIL ADDRESSES!! (fwd) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I would not characterize this as "spamming". 1. "Spam" (apologies to Hormel, Inc.) is junk (e)mail. It is unsolicited advertising, directed at ordinary citizens. It is not intended to amount to a denial-of-service, of course, as this would defeat the intended message. 2. An email-based protest is directed at a particular party or set of parties, usually a government (or corporate) office, intending to demonstrate the depth or breadth of resistance to a particular policy. It "may" be intended to amount to a denial-of-service. 3. A pure email-based denial-of-service attack would load up emails with maximal "garbage" content, in an attempt to overwhelm the target, through both the size and number of emails. The "Navy Out Of Vieques" action sounds like (2) to me. ___tony___ At 08:50 PM 4/30/01 +0500, you wrote: >Shall we call this a version of spamming? > >Regards, >Ozair [snip] >The above are emails that belong to several Navy officials and officers. >Send then an email demanding that the U.S. Navy leave Vieques immediately. >Spread these emails far and wide as well!! Motivate others to do likewise. > >U.S. NAVY OUT OF VIEQUES >FREE THE PUERTO RICAN POLITICAL PRISONERS!! Tony Bartoletti 925-422-3881 <azb@llnl.gov> Information Operations, Warfare and Assurance Center Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, CA 94551-9900 ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-06-30 21:44:09 PDT