[iwar] How good is missile defense system?

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2001-07-31 05:22:33


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-1507-996582155-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 31 Jul 2001 05:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 10663 invoked by uid 510); 31 Jul 2001 11:25:00 -0000
Received: from n22.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.72) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 31 Jul 2001 11:25:00 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-1507-996582155-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.4.54] by cj.egroups.com with NNFMP; 31 Jul 2001 12:22:35 -0000
X-Sender: fc@big.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 31 Jul 2001 12:22:35 -0000
Received: (qmail 4213 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2001 12:22:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 31 Jul 2001 12:22:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO big.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta1 with SMTP; 31 Jul 2001 12:22:33 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by big.all.net (8.9.3/8.7.3) id FAA11755 for iwar@onelist.com; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 05:22:33 -0700
Message-Id: <200107311222.FAA11755@big.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 05:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iwar] How good is missile defense system?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Defense Week
July 30, 2001
In Anti-Missile Test, Target Signaled Its Location
By John M. Donnelly
In this month's high-profile anti-ICBM test, a prototype interceptor was
able to find a target warhead partly because the target signaled its
location to the interceptor for much of the flight, and the transmissions
formed the basis of the targeting orders, according to officials and
documents.
The presence of the beacon, or "C-band transponder," on the target warhead
didn't guarantee that the interceptor would find and kill the target in the
July 14 test of President Bush's proposed missile shield. But the
target-location data gave the interceptor rocket a precise point in space at
which to aim and made its job much easier than would be the case if it had
relied on a ground radar's natural receptors, a Pentagon official confirmed.
What's more, a decoy that flew in the exercise to test the interceptor's
ability to distinguish a fake warhead from a real one had no such beacon on
it.
...

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Small business owners...
Tell us what you think!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/vO1FAB/txzCAA/ySSFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-09-29 21:08:38 PDT