Return-Path: <sentto-279987-1853-1000413962-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 13 Sep 2001 13:48:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 10370 invoked by uid 510); 13 Sep 2001 20:46:28 -0000 Received: from n11.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.61) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 13 Sep 2001 20:46:28 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-1853-1000413962-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.4.56] by c3.egroups.com with NNFMP; 13 Sep 2001 20:46:03 -0000 X-Sender: fc@big.all.net X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_1); 13 Sep 2001 20:46:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 6263 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2001 20:44:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 13 Sep 2001 20:44:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO big.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta2 with SMTP; 13 Sep 2001 20:44:34 -0000 Received: (from fc@localhost) by big.all.net (8.9.3/8.7.3) id NAA17878 for iwar@onelist.com; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 13:27:59 -0700 Message-Id: <200109132027.NAA17878@big.all.net> To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List) Organization: I'm not allowed to say X-Mailer: don't even ask X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net> Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 13:27:59 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Subject: [iwar] [fc:Former-U.S.-Official:-Prepare-for-'Electronic-Pearl-Harbor'] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Former U.S. Official: Prepare for 'Electronic Pearl Harbor' By Robyn Weisman, www.NewsFactor.com, 9/13/2001 <a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nf/20010912/tc/13479_1.html">http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nf/20010912/tc/13479_1.html> In the wake of Tuesday's devastating terrorist attacks against the World Trade Center and the Pentagon (news - web sites), experts are debating not only whether these attacks will continue, but also whether they will spill over into cyberspace. Administrators associated with the FBI (news - web sites)'s National Infrastructure Protection Center (NIPC) and with CERT's (Computer Emergency Response Team) Coordination Center have so far not found evidence that any cyber attacks were coordinated with the physical attacks on the U.S. Tuesday. But Marv Langston, former deputy CIO for the Department of Defense (news - web sites) (DoD), told news publications that the United States needs to prepare itself for "an electronic Pearl Harbor." NIPC officials convened for an emergency meeting to analyze any strands of intelligence that might have some connection with the attacks. Nothing Out of the Ordinary Ryan Russell, incident analyst for SecurityFocus.com, the Internet security firm that first discovered and wrote up the Code Red II virus, told NewsFactor Network that his group has yet to see anything out of the ordinary over the last 24 hours. "We have been watching for any unusual attack patterns very carefully," Russell told NewsFactor. "We haven't detected any major denial of service attacks, no new worms or viruses, nothing of that sort yet." Frank Prince, an analyst with Forrester Research, told NewsFactor that the terrorist attacks on the U.S. are, for now, not an Internet story. There was no apparent Internet-related component to the attack, Prince said. "The Internet itself was resilient in the face of the upsurge of usage that occurred," he added. Cyber World Not Sleeping Russell did say that SecurityFocus would continue to monitor activities at the request of the U.S. government. He added that the agencies in charge of watching for cyber attacks are on alert as well. Ben Venzke, CEO of IntelCenter, noted in an e-mail that "cyber-based actors are calling for cyber attacks against Arab nation state networks and terrorist computer networks." He added that we should "expect Arab hackers to retaliate if attacks materialize." Michael Rasmussen, a senior industry analyst for enterprise security with Giga Information Group, sent NewsFactor a "cautionary" brief about the potential cyber-crisis. In the brief, Rasmussen wrote that while "we are not aware of any hostile activities directed at the Internet and information structures of the United States, there will undoubtedly be a cyber component to [Tuesday's] events in some form or another." Recent Examples, Future Fears Rasmussen cited the recent cyberwar between Chinese and U.S. hackers as an example, adding that "organizations were a target just for being associated with the opposing country," and that the targets were not exclusively military. "Just because attention [has been] diverted to the physical world does not mean the cyberworld is sleeping," said Rasmussen. "There may very well be cyber attacks underway, or planned in the near future, as a result of today's events." Analyst Russell told NewsFactor that as disruptive as Internet attacks can be to critical infrastructure, Tuesday's events demonstrate that attacks in the physical world are still a lot more devastating that those in cyberspace -- so far. Said Russell: "I'm not looking forward to the day when medical or building control devices are connected to the Internet to the point where lives can be ended with software." ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Secure all your Web servers now: Get your FREE Guide and learn to: DEPLOY THE LATEST ENCRYPTION, DELIVER TRANSPARENT PROTECTION, and More! http://us.click.yahoo.com/k0k.gC/nT7CAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-09-29 21:08:42 PDT