[iwar] [fc:Pentagon.said.to.eye.nuclear.attack.against.terrorists]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2001-09-20 20:44:15


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-2142-1001043855-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 20 Sep 2001 20:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 11055 invoked by uid 510); 21 Sep 2001 03:44:37 -0000
Received: from n5.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.55) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 21 Sep 2001 03:44:37 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-2142-1001043855-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.4.54] by hl.egroups.com with NNFMP; 21 Sep 2001 03:44:15 -0000
X-Sender: fc@big.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 21 Sep 2001 03:44:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 68421 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2001 03:44:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 21 Sep 2001 03:44:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO big.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta1 with SMTP; 21 Sep 2001 03:44:15 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by big.all.net (8.9.3/8.7.3) id UAA06576 for iwar@onelist.com; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 20:44:15 -0700
Message-Id: <200109210344.UAA06576@big.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 20:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iwar] [fc:Pentagon.said.to.eye.nuclear.attack.against.terrorists]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Pentagon said to eye nuclear attack against terrorists

WASHINGTON (Kyodo) The Defense Department has recommended to President
George W.  Bush the use of tactical nuclear weapons as a military option
to retaliate for last week's terrorist attacks in the United States,
diplomatic sources said Tuesday. 

It is unknown whether Bush has made any decision.  Military analysts
said the president is unlikely to opt for the use of nuclear weapons
because doing so would generate a backlash from the international
community and could even trigger revenge from the enemy involving
weapons of mass destruction. 

However, the Pentagon's suggestion shows the determination of U.S. 
officials to retaliate for the first massive terrorist attacks on the
U.S.  mainland, the analysts said. 

The recommendation appears intended to deter terrorists, they said. 

On ABC television's "This Week" program Sunday, Defense Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld refused to rule out the use of tactical nuclear weapons. 
Rumsfeld, who is notoriously tight-lipped with the press, avoided
answering a question on whether their use could be ruled out.  To a
similar question, a Pentagon official also replied, "We will not discuss
operational and intelligence matters."

The diplomatic sources said the Pentagon recommended using tactical
nuclear weapons shortly after it became known that the terrorist attacks
caused an unprecedented number of civilian casualties. 

On Sept.  11, hijackers seized four commercial U.S.  aircraft.  Two of
the planes slammed into the twin towers of New York's World Trade
Center, while a third hit the Pentagon near Washington.  The fourth
plane crashed outside Pittsburgh.  More than 5,000 people were left dead
or missing in the attacks. 

Tactical nuclear weapons have been developed to attack very specific
targets.  The military analysts said Pentagon officials are apparently
thinking of using weapons that can reach and destroy terrorists hiding
in an underground shelter, limiting damage to surrounding areas. 

In 1986, the U.S.  conducted an air raid on Libya, attempting to target
Col.  Moammar Gadhafi.  In 1998, Washington fired a cruise missile into
Afghanistan in an attempt to kill Osama bin Laden. 

Analysts said that since these attempts failed, U.S.  officials may be
mulling the use of tactical nuclear weapons, which can cause much
greater destruction than conventional weapons. 

The U.S.  has indicated that it does not rule out the use of nuclear
weapons if a country attacks the U.S., its allies, or its forces with
chemical or biological weapons. 

The Japan Times: Sept.  20, 2001 (C) All rights reserved


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Pinpoint the right security solution for your company- Learn how to add 128- bit encryption and to authenticate your web site with VeriSign's FREE guide!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/JNm9_D/33_CAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-09-29 21:08:46 PDT