[iwar] [fc:Marc.Bumgarner:.Why.do.they.hate.us.so.much?]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2001-09-22 12:29:49


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-2224-1001187004-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:33:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 2038 invoked by uid 510); 22 Sep 2001 19:30:29 -0000
Received: from n25.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.75) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 22 Sep 2001 19:30:29 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-2224-1001187004-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.4.54] by mv.egroups.com with NNFMP; 22 Sep 2001 19:30:04 -0000
X-Sender: fc@big.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 22 Sep 2001 19:30:04 -0000
Received: (qmail 16039 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2001 19:30:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 22 Sep 2001 19:30:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO big.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta2 with SMTP; 22 Sep 2001 19:29:58 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by big.all.net (8.9.3/8.7.3) id MAA19324 for iwar@onelist.com; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:29:49 -0700
Message-Id: <200109221929.MAA19324@big.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:29:49 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iwar] [fc:Marc.Bumgarner:.Why.do.they.hate.us.so.much?]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Marc Bumgarner: Why do they hate us so much? 

What could cause a group of individuals to be consumed with so much
hatred toward the United States that they are willing to kill themselves
while committing premeditated mass murder? The United States is not yet
sure who carried out the shocking attacks that rocked the nation, but
there is no shortage of people with a motive.  Millions of Muslims in
the Arab world despise the United States.  Why do they hate us so much?
This is perhaps the most crucial question the United States could now
ask itself, as in its answer lies the key to defeating terrorism. 
Though heinous and barbaric, terrorism is practiced to effect political
change.  Political change is desired in response to a perceived
injustice; hate is also born out of this sense of injustice.  The
greater the injustice, the greater is the determination to effect
political change. 

The inevitable and forthcoming United States military response may
decimate Osama bin Laden’s terrorist organization, but it won t alter
the sense of injustice and hate that gave rise to his organization.  The
primary reasons for the existing hatred are the following:

Israel and Palestine The Palestinians are a legitimate nation with a
legitimate national claim to the land of Palestine.  This is an
undisputed, internationally recognized fact; UN Security Resolutions 242
and 338 call for Israel s territorial withdrawal from the West Bank and
Gaza.  Today, Israel is a thriving and formidable nation and the state
of Palestine is still just a gleam in Yasser Arafat s eye.  For 34
years, Israel has denied the Palestinians the rights to
self-determination, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.  The
United States is providing $3 billion a year in financial aid and nearly
unconditional political support to the government that continues to deny
the Palestinians these unalienable rights; in this sense, the United
States has contributed greatly to the ongoing injustice suffered by all
Palestinians.  The Palestinians have legitimate grievances.  In 1776,
the U.S.  went to war with the world s most powerful nation to right
such grievances.  Iraq - In the 1991 Gulf war, Iraq s electrical
generating plants and sewage treatment networks were wiped out.  Iraq s
infrastructure bridges, highways, roads, canals, and communication
centers were systematically destroyed.  In 1991, UN inspectors concluded
that the bombing had reduced Iraq to a pre-industrial age.  Today, the
United States and Britain are still dropping bombs on Iraq.  For the
past eleven years, the United States has been the driving force behind
UN sanctions against Saddam Hussein and the 22 million Iraqi people. 
Estimates vary, but World Health Organization and UNICEF studies certify
that sanctions are responsible for the death of over 1 million Iraqi
civilians, including approximately 670,000 children.  Using like
percentages, this is comparable to killing 12.8 million Americans,
including 8.6 million children.  Genocide is taking place right now,
every day, in Iraq, perpetrated by the very power that claims to set the
standard for democracy, freedom, and justice. 

In Afghanistan, the U.S.  cruise missile attacks launched by then
President Clinton failed to kill Osama bin Laden.  Instead, the missiles
killed a reported 24 civilians, including 3 children, and wounded
several other civilians.  The United States may describe these events
employing the morally repugnant term collateral damage, but the people
killed or wounded would in all likelihood describe it as an injustice. 
In Sudan in 1998, United States cruise missile strikes in Sudan
destroyed a pharmaceutical plant.  At the time of the attack, the United
States claimed that the plant was producing chemical weapons, and that
it had a financial link to Osama bin Laden.  No evidence has ever been
brought forth proving these claims.  In fact, Sandy Berger, National
Security advisor in 1998, has since declared it is not necessarily the
case that chemical weapons were being produced at the pharmaceutical
plant.  Berger now says, I think it is certainly true that the plant was
associated with chemical weapons and that bin Laden had made a financial
contribution to the military industrial corporation. 

This attack destroyed a legitimate pharmaceutical plant, killed one
civilian, and constituted, according to international law, an act of
war.  Economic sanctions.  The United States also maintains sanctions
against Iran, Sudan, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, all Muslim countries. 
Though intended to coerce governments into policy changes, sanctions
primarily punish the ordinary citizen.  To the average

Muslim in the street, it appears the U.S.  is targeting them, says Said
K.  Aburish, a Palestinian born journalist and author of the book Coming
Fall of the House of Saud.  Saudi Arabia Osama bin Laden himself has
publicly stated that U.S.  policy in Saudi Arabia is one reason for his
fatwah declaration against the United States.  Specifically, Bin Laden
believes +There is no more important duty than pushing Americans out of
the holy land [Saudi Arabia].  They have attacked Islam and its most
significant, sacrosanct symbols.  The country of the Two Holy Places has
in our religion a peculiarity of its own.  The United States maintains
approximately 5000 troops on Saudi soil, home to two of Islam s most
revered religious sites, Mecca and Medina, and the birthplace of the
prophet Muhammad.  The continued U.S.  military presence in one of Islam
s holiest of places is religiously unacceptable to Saudis, says Aburish. 
Bin Laden’s second publicly stated reason behind his fatwah declaration
is America’s meddling in Saudi affairs and its politics its support of
the oppressive, corrupt and tyrannical Saudi regime.  Though it is the
world s largest oil producer, Saudi Arabia is financially broke and
heavily in debt.  Aburish says, The Saudi government is not terribly
different than Saddam Hussein s regime.  People have no voice in the
running of the government.  People disappear in the middle of the night,
and people are imprisoned without being charged.  And the government has
squandered the country’s wealth. 

In effect, bin Laden has declared to the United States, Get out of Saudi
Arabia, and leave us alone.  These are his demands, and this is the
political change he wishes to bring about through the use of terrorism. 
By now, most Americans are familiar with the explanations proffered by
the politicians, pundits, and media for the existing hatred: their
terrorism is not aimed at reversing any specific U.S.  policy it is
driven by pure hatred for the values cherished in the West.  Life,
liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, our way of life, is a mortal
threat to everything the terrorists hold dear.  It is not what we’ve
done, but what we stand for, who we are.  These explanations are only
partial truths, and dangerously ignore the major culprit - U.S.  foreign
policy.  Neither Osama bin Laden nor any other terrorist has ever
committed any terrorist act because the United States cherishes life,
liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. 

Why do they hate us so much? The hatred exists because U.S.  foreign
policy is either responsible for or contributing to gross injustices
perpetrated against Muslims around the world.  The United States may see
itself as a good and civilizing force in the world, but the millions of
Muslim civilians killed or suffering under U.S.  foreign policy do not
agree.  Osama bin Laden is a product of circumstances - the corrupt rule
of the Saudi royal family, and hostile U.S.  foreign policy.  Therefore,
the United States must view bin Laden and his organization as a
phenomenon, not as a group of terrorists to be killed.  Kill bin Laden,
and 10 others like him will spring forward.  The United States cannot
simply bomb hatred off the face of the planet and live happily ever
after.  The deep and lasting hatred felt by millions of Muslims requires
an acceptance that these are forces United States foreign policy has
helped set loose.  In some respects, we have met the enemy, and the
enemy is us.  The war on terrorism will never be won until the United
States first asks the question, Why do they hate us so much? But it is
not enough to simply ask the question.  The United States must be
willing to objectively analyze the answers, applying a mature
understanding of and sensitivity to other cultures and peoples.  Only
then can the United States develop a foreign policy anchored in the
belief that liberty and justice for all applies to all world citizens,
and that reflects, as Henry Kissinger called it, America s generosity of
spirit.  Until that time, the war on terrorism cannot be won. 

MARC BUMGARNER 
Chicago, Illinois USA 

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get your FREE VeriSign guide to security solutions for your web site: encrypting transactions, securing intranets, and more!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/XrFcOC/m5_CAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-09-29 21:08:48 PDT