[iwar] [fc:Bush.admin.to.make.hacking.a.terrorist.offence]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2001-09-25 21:23:50

Next message: Fred Cohen: "[iwar] [fc:Massive.search.reveals.no.secret.code.in.web.images]"
Previous message: Fred Cohen: "[iwar] [fc:Rumsfeld:.Pentagon.Won't.Lie]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Message-Id: <200109260423.VAA08949@big.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 21:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iwar] [fc:Bush.admin.to.make.hacking.a.terrorist.offence]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Bush admin to make hacking a terrorist offence

By Thomas C Greene in Washington

Posted: 25/09/2001 at 08:57 GMT

US Attorney General John Ashcroft went to Capitol Hill Monday afternoon
to sell the Bush Administration's new slew of anti-terror laws to the
House Judiciary Committee. 

Among the many provisions to make the entire US populace an Enemy of the
State and therefore subject to suspicion were two which nearly gave me a
stroke: one positively Nazi innovation enabling the indefinite detention
of suspicious aliens with a prohibition on judicial review so no judge
can stop the insanity (which proves that they know it's
unconstitutional); and one which would elevate hacking to the level of a
terrorist act and invoke a mandatory life sentence. 

The old Hamre/Clark dream of preemptively prosecuting the 'Electronic
Pearl Harbor' is alive and well in the hands of Bush's advisors. 

US Representative Howard Coble (Republican, North Carolina) brought up
the hacking controversy by lobbing a sticky softball gracefully in
Ashcroft's direction:

"The Administration's bill includes provisions for the prosecution of
certain computer crimes as terrorist offences.  What about this type of
offense makes it necessary to include them in the definition of
terrorism," he asked suggestively. 

Ashcroft took his lead perfectly, in spite of Coble's constant
interruptions: "Why should computer crimes rise to the level of
terrorist acts? When you think about the utilization of computers in air
traffic control, you can imagine the chaos that could come from the
disruption of that system..."

"I gotcha," Coble growled. 

"...if we had an assault launched through a computer virus or some other
infection in the computer infrastructure.  not to mention other very
serious controls that relate to other infrastructure whether it be power
grids, power generation, supplies and the like.... 

"Yeah I wanted that on the record, General, because some folks might
think it was too far reaching.  I just wanted it on the record," Coble
said slyly. 

"Well, you and I obviously are on the same wavelength..."

"Damn straight," Coble growled again. 

"...We understand that these kinds of crimes can threaten the lives and
well-being of multitudes of individuals," Ashcroft said finally. 

Not everyone on the committee was thrilled with the proposed
legislation, which is in some sort of mad race to the finish line and
scheduled for markup Tuesday morning. 

Ranking member John Conyers (Democrat, Michigan) was among those least
amused. 

"There are a number of provisions in your measure that give us
Constitutional trouble," he noted.  Such things as indefinite detention
and permitting surveillance of Americans performed by foreign agents to
be used as evidence in court.  Conyers was "deeply troubled" by those
and at least a half-dozen other provisions. 

Ashcroft retaliated by trying to make Conyers appear unpatriotic. 

"This is a time for leadership," he replied, leaning hard on the
implication that to apply reason in the current anti-terrorist frenzy
would be one of the worst career moves a politician could make. 

"We would be ill advised to find a reason that someone else might be
slowing down, and indicate that we didn't understand the urgency that
was appropriate to the ability to protect the American people.  We need
to unleash every possible tool in the fight against terrorism and do so
promptly."

It was a bit confused, a bit rough, but if I take him right, he was
trying to say, 'it would amount to political suicide if you were seen to
be dithering over semantics and legal niceties while the Administration
is trying to bring Justice and Safety to the world.'

He characterized the Bush package as "careful, balanced, long-overdue
improvements to our capacity to combat terrorism."

"It is not a wish list; it is modest set of essential proposals,"
Ashcroft insisted. 

Let's hope less hysterical heads prevail.  Ž

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Pinpoint the right security solution for your company- Learn how to add 128- bit encryption and to authenticate your web site with VeriSign's FREE guide!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/JNm9_D/33_CAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Next message: Fred Cohen: "[iwar] [fc:Massive.search.reveals.no.secret.code.in.web.images]"
Previous message: Fred Cohen: "[iwar] [fc:Rumsfeld:.Pentagon.Won't.Lie]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-09-29 21:08:49 PDT