[iwar] [fc:Broader.surveillance.won't.prevent.terrorism.-Schneier]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2001-09-26 22:17:08


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-2398-1001567829-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 802 invoked by uid 510); 27 Sep 2001 05:17:26 -0000
Received: from n8.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.58) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 27 Sep 2001 05:17:26 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-2398-1001567829-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.1.222] by fk.egroups.com with NNFMP; 27 Sep 2001 05:17:10 -0000
X-Sender: fc@big.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 27 Sep 2001 05:17:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 29670 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2001 05:17:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by 10.1.1.222 with QMQP; 27 Sep 2001 05:17:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO big.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta1 with SMTP; 27 Sep 2001 05:17:09 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by big.all.net (8.9.3/8.7.3) id WAA02580 for iwar@onelist.com; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:17:09 -0700
Message-Id: <200109270517.WAA02580@big.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iwar] [fc:Broader.surveillance.won't.prevent.terrorism.-Schneier]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Broader surveillance won't prevent terrorism -Schneier 
By John Leyden, The Register, 9/26/2001
<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/21892.html">http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/21892.html>

The clamour for the introduction of wider surveillance measures has been
deafening in the wake of the September 11 terror attacks. 

To date, opponents against such moves have argued mostly for civil
liberties reasons.  But the case against can also be made on the grounds
that more surveillance simply won't work. 

That's the analysis of Bruce Schneier, founder and chief technology
officer of Counterpane Internet Security, who says the failure to
anticipate the September 11 attacks was one of data interpretation, not
data collection. 

Speaking today at the Information Security Solution Europe conference in
London, Schneier drew parallels between Internet security and physical
security to make his point that more widespread monitoring is in itself
unlikely to prevent terrorism. 

"You can either build a system right or build it wrong and watch
everybody," said Schneier.  "Broad surveillance is generally the sign of
a badly designed system of security."

Instead of relying on collecting more data (signals intelligence),
counter terrorism agencies should put more effort into human
intelligence. 

"The Stasi collected data on four million East Germans, roughly one
fourth of their population.  Yet they failed to predict the fall of the
Berlin Wall because they invested too heavily in data collection and too
little in data interpretation and human intelligence," Schneier argued. 
He said it was possible to increase security without taking away privacy
and liberty and encouraged people to look for real answers to the
problem of terrorism, which he admitted was far from straightforward. 
He suggested combing prevention, detection, and response to achieve
something approaching robust and resilient security was the best we
could hope for. 

There's a chance to redesign our "public infrastructures for security",
according to Schneier.  We wonder if this root-and-branch option will be
adopted.  reg;


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Pinpoint the right security solution for your company- Learn how to add 128- bit encryption and to authenticate your web site with VeriSign's FREE guide!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yQix2C/33_CAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-09-29 21:08:50 PDT