[iwar] [fc:China.Re-Blocks.News.Sites]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2001-09-26 23:08:40


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-2410-1001570843-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 26 Sep 2001 23:12:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 3197 invoked by uid 510); 27 Sep 2001 06:08:57 -0000
Received: from n2.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.52) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 27 Sep 2001 06:08:57 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-2410-1001570843-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.1.220] by hi.egroups.com with NNFMP; 27 Sep 2001 06:08:41 -0000
X-Sender: fc@big.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 27 Sep 2001 06:07:23 -0000
Received: (qmail 60928 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2001 06:07:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by 10.1.1.220 with QMQP; 27 Sep 2001 06:07:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO big.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta3 with SMTP; 27 Sep 2001 06:08:40 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by big.all.net (8.9.3/8.7.3) id XAA03714 for iwar@onelist.com; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 23:08:40 -0700
Message-Id: <200109270608.XAA03714@big.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 23:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iwar] [fc:China.Re-Blocks.News.Sites]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

China Re-Blocks News Sites
By Steve Friess 

9:40 a.m. Sep. 26, 2001 PDT

BEIJING -- For information-hungry citizens here who had been kept off
major news sites by Chinese government censors, the sudden ability last
week to access several prominent media outlets online seemed too good to
be true. 

It was. 

Less than a week after Chinese censors unblocked the sites of The
Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, the San Francisco Chronicle and
the BBC, the sites were reblocked on Saturday. 

Yet, as further evidence of the seemingly haphazard method the Chinese
government applies to govern cyberspace, The Boston Globe remains
unblocked after becoming accessible at the same time as the other sites. 

China's Ministry of Public Security, which oversees the nation's
Internet censors, refused to explain why it blocks or unblocks certain
sites.  Yet many question whether any coherent explanations even exist. 
As CNN's Beijing Bureau Chief Jaime FlorCruz insisted, "There's no rhyme
or reason."

The reblocked sites join again a lengthy list of blocked media outlets
that include CNN, Voice of America and The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. 
China also blocks the sites of several human rights organizations and
denies users access to links found through Yahoo or Google in searches
on "Falun Gong," "Taiwan," or "Tiananmen Square Massacre."

The New York Times, unblocked in August after the paper's top editors
personally appealed to Chinese President Jiang Zemin in July during a
face-to-face interview, remained accessible.  The Boston Globe is owned
by The Times' parent company, but it's unclear whether its ownership is
related to The Globe's ability to remain unblocked. 

Zhu Feng, an international studies scholar at Peking University in
Beijing, who said last week he believed the government had opened the
sites to meet the demand for news on the U.S.  terror attacks, admitted
he was puzzled by the latest development. 

But Sophia Woodman, research director for the New York watchdog group
Human Rights in China, was not surprised.  She had speculated the site
openings might have been the result of a computer glitch, although she
also thought perhaps they were a Chinese government effort to garner
better international press. 

"The fact that they continue to block these U.S.  newspapers despite the
fact that the number of people in China who are likely to access news on
them is so limited should indicate the level of censorship that's going
on," Woodman said. 

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Pinpoint the right security solution for your company- Learn how to add 128- bit encryption and to authenticate your web site with VeriSign's FREE guide!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yQix2C/33_CAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-09-29 21:08:50 PDT