[iwar] [fc:Web.Sites.Pull.Sensitive.Materials]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2001-10-03 17:54:55


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-2666-1002156897-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 03 Oct 2001 17:56:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 4022 invoked by uid 510); 4 Oct 2001 00:55:01 -0000
Received: from n23.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.73) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2001 00:55:01 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-2666-1002156897-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.4.56] by n23.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Oct 2001 00:54:57 -0000
X-Sender: fc@big.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 4 Oct 2001 00:54:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 66232 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2001 00:54:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 4 Oct 2001 00:54:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO big.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta1 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2001 00:54:55 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by big.all.net (8.9.3/8.7.3) id RAA21447 for iwar@onelist.com; Wed, 3 Oct 2001 17:54:55 -0700
Message-Id: <200110040054.RAA21447@big.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 17:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iwar] [fc:Web.Sites.Pull.Sensitive.Materials]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Web Sites Pull Sensitive Materials

By ANICK JESDANUN, AP Internet Writer

NEW YORK (AP) - Before Sept.  11, the Federation of American Scientists'
Web site offered details on obscure or secret U.S.  intelligence
facilities. 

Another site detailed special gatherings at Minot Air Force Base in
North Dakota, while yet another accepted orders for maps of military
installations. 

No longer. 

Concerned they could be aiding terrorists, some government and private
Web sites have decided to stop sharing quite so much potentially
sensitive data. 

Such self-censorship wouldn't prevent terrorists from turning to
libraries or even other Web sites for information that could be useful
in attacks. 

``But that is not a justification for publishing it in easily accessible
ways.  Let them work for it,'' said Steven Aftergood, senior research
analyst at the scientists' group. 

The private organization removed from the Web its research containing
locations, building layouts and aerial images of intelligence offices,
some unacknowledged by the U.S.  government.  Also removed were details
on nuclear sites abroad. 

Minot removed clues about where personnel may be gathering, including
schedules of activities and locations of military housing units. 

The National Imagery and Mapping Agency suspended online and offline
sales of maps of military installations as well as its
highest-resolution maps of other U.S.  locations. 

The U.S.  Office of Pipeline Safety now restricts its mapping software
and pipeline data to industry and government officials, while the
Environmental Protection Agency (news - web sites) removed information
on chemical plants and their emergency response plans. 

``People have a right to know what kinds of risks there are, but
unfortunately terrorists are people, too,'' said Jim Makris, the EPA's
emergency coordinator. 

The reports are still available in EPA reading rooms, but Makris said
identification is required. 

Jeremiah Baumann of the U.S.  Public Interest Research Group, a private
watchdog organization, criticized the EPA's decision and said the data
``would not be very useful to terrorists.''

Still, Baumann's group took down a 1999 report based on the EPA data to
avoid provoking a debate on public disclosure at this time. 

Censorship is also occurring for non-security reasons. 

Some online forums have deleted hate messages attacking Muslims.  A news
site, Irish Republican Activist Radio, suspended operations out of fear
it may be accused of supporting terrorism and have assets seized. 

The removed or restricted materials represent only a tiny chunk of
what's available on the Internet, but First Amendment advocates worry
that this is only the beginning. 

``It's a fine balance that must be struck here, but in wartime, the
temptation is always to greater censorship rather than less,'' said Adam
Powell, vice president for technology and programs at The Freedom Forum. 

In the meantime, the Internet still has plenty of information that could
potentially aid terrorists. 

Airports publish terminal maps, while amateur astronomers post fly-by
schedules of satellites, letting terrorists know when to duck.  Boeing
Co.  and other sites disclose fuel capacity of aircraft. 

One site sells videotapes of the cockpit where ``the Captain explains
every major instrument and avionics system.''

It's unclear the extent to which terrorists used the Net to plot the
World Trade Center and Pentagon (news - web sites) attacks. 

One suspect who listed a flight school as his address on a pilot's
license may have gotten it from printed brochures or the Internet, while
online travel sites such as Travelocity were used to purchase tickets. 

Attorney General John Ashcroft (news - web sites) told Congress that one
person in federal custody had downloaded information about crop-dusting
planes, which could be used for biological or chemical attacks. 

William C.  Martel, professor of national security affairs at the Naval
War College in Newport, R.I., called online censorship futile. 

``We can easily come into the category of shutting down the Internet,''
Martel said.  ``Think of how many mundane pieces of information can be
used for ill purposes.''

Saying benefits outweigh the potential for misuse, operators of Trip.com
kept its FlightTracker service giving real-time information on speed,
altitude and location of flights en route. 

Boeing, meanwhile, reviewed its Internet offerings the day of the
attacks and left everything up.  Said Boeing spokesman Bob Jorgensen,
``If it has the potential of aiding and abetting the enemy, it's not out
there in the first place.''


------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 20:59:53 PST