[iwar] [fc:War.against.Terrorism.or.Crusade.against.Islam?]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2001-10-03 22:12:41
Next message: Fred Cohen: "[iwar] [fc:Ebola-style.killer.virus.sweeps.Afghan.border]"
Previous message: Fred Cohen: "[iwar] [fc:Implications.of.a.Palestinian.state.for.Israeli.security.and.nuclear.war:.A.Jurisprudential.Assessment]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-Id: <200110040512.WAA24389@big.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 22:12:41 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iwar] [fc:War.against.Terrorism.or.Crusade.against.Islam?]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

            War against Terrorism or Crusade against Islam?
                          By Dr Firoz Osman

 The skull and crossbones that used to wave over the waters of the
Caribbean, or the cavalry that charged across Red Indian territory has
now changed to the Stars and Stripes waving over the Persian Gulf. The
colours may have changed, but the motives and the psychology remain
identical: the United States of America is a bandit State that flouts
international law and - nine out of ten times - gets away with it.

Flanked with NATO countries and US bases in the Gulf States and Arabia
and by US client-states such as Pakistan , and the seas patrolled
non-stop by the Sixth Fleet, the US is free to engage in acts of
destruction with total impunity. President Bush warned to launch a
"crusade", awakening memories of medieval Christian Europe's bloody
campaign to capture the holy city of Jerusalem. Usama bin Laden was
accused within one hour of the attack, when Boeings, transformed into
missiles, slammed into the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon. After
years of vilifying and demonising him, Afghanistan and Muslims,
"smoking them out of their holes...dead or alive" was a matter of
course. Whether they are innocent or guilty did not matter.

On numerous occasions, policy-makers and and politicians in the West,
particularly the United States, have exploited this stereotype of
bloodthirsty Muslim tyrants and despots to advance self-serving
foreign policy objectives.
In the aftermath of the Iranian revolution and the hostage crisis, for
instance, they used all the major American television networks and
newspapers to whip up mass hysteria against 'militant' Islam, the
Shi'ite, Khomeini, the Mullahs, purdah and so on. Thirteen years
later, following the 1993 bomb blast at the World Trade Centre in New
York, and now yet again, one hears the strident shriek about Islamic
'terrorism' and Islamic 'fundamentalism.'

In spite of the flimsiest of evidence, American investigators, and
more so the American media, have concluded that the attack was the
work of .the Islamic 'fundamentalist' and 'terrorist',Usama bin Laden.
Though there are solid theories implicating a host of groups such as
U.S.-based right-wing militants, Mossad, anti-globalisation factions,
etc. - the US establishment has decided to put the blame on Muslims.
And, as the American writer Jane Hunter points out, "..in a society
with very little understanding of the Middle East, there is a danger
that all Arabs and Muslims will be stigmatised."

Remarks by President George Bush, Secretary of State Colin Powell and
Defence Minister Rumsfield, despite assurances to the Muslims that
this was not a war against Islam, included references to a "crusade"
and the "civilised world", the "free world" and "democracy" being
attacked by the "evil ones". If the West is waging a crusade are we to
compare it with the one Europe waged against Islam 10 centuries ago?
If the West is the civilised world, are the Muslims savages? If
democracy and freedom in the West is under attack, why is the US
sponsoring and protecting a bunch of despotic regimes across the
Muslim region against the wishes of the people who are struggling for
democracy and freedom?

Why, one may ask, are Muslims vilified in this manner? Part of the
explanation lies in the Muslim conquest and occupation of parts of
Western, Southern and Eastern Europe for long centuries. The infamous
crusades which ended in defeat for the Christian invaders of
Arab-Muslim lands in West Asia also heightened European antagonism
towards Islam and its followers. During the colonial period of the
19/20th centuries Muslim groups were among the fiercest opponents of
alien subjugation. This, in a sense, is at the root of contemporary
Western antagonism toward Islam and Muslims.

Muslim societies are discovering that they are once again targets of
new forms of Western domination and control. This is primarily because
most of the world's oil reserves -the lifeblood of Western industrial
civilisation-lie beneath Muslim feet. Controlling Muslim oil has been
a fundamental goal of US policy for at least the last 4 decades.
Anyone who dares to resist American control, or worse challenges its
hegemony, is at once branded 'extremist', a 'radical', a 'terrorist'
,or simply 'a threat to peace and stability.'

This was the fate of the Iranian , Iraqi, Libyan and Sudanese
leaderships, ever since they gained control of their oil from the
early seventies. Whatever the ideological orientations of these
leaderships - and indeed each one relates to Islam in a different way
- the West has decided that they are all Muslim militants and sponsors
of terrorism.

Zionism has played a major part in the demonisation and disparagement
of Islam, becoming more intense since the creation of Israel in 1948.
Former Israeli Prime Minister Yitzak Rabin declared, "We stand first
today in the line of fire against the danger of extremist Islam". With
their disproportionate influence over Western media, the Zionists have
sought to depict Islam as a militant faith and Muslims as individuals
prone to violence.

Ariel Sharon told Powell, "Everyone has their bin Laden ... and ours
is called Yasser Arafat." Within hours of the attack, Ehud Barak in
London and Shimon Peres on US television were opportunistically
denouncing Muslim "terrorists". Israel's Defence Minister ben Elezier
stated that not even a thousand diplomats could have promoted the case
for Israel as did the bombing. By portraying Islam in such a
derogatory light, all movements that resist Israeli occupation and
subjugation -the real freedom fighters- are invariably described in
mainstream Western media as "terrorists".

Indeed, Islam is rapidly emerging as the ideological rallying point
for Muslims everywhere as they aspire for genuine liberation from the
fetters of both local despotism and global authoritarianism. Given the
prevailing perceptions of Islam in the West, one can expect the
political elites to respond to Islamic resurgence with more
antagonism. As the American Christian scholar Karen Armstrong put it,
in her analysis of Western-Muslim relations, "We in the West must come
to terms with our own inner demons of prejudice, chauvinism, and
anxiety, and strive for a greater objectivity".

In the process, one hopes that the West will realise that if there is
to be genuine peace and harmony between the West and Islam - and
within the human family as a whole- those structures that allow the
few who are powerful to dominate the many who are powerless would have
to be replaced by new institutions that promote equality and justice
for all.


Dr Firoz Osman is the secretary of the MEDIA REVIEW NETWORK, an
advocacy group based in Pretoria.

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Pinpoint the right security solution for your company- Learn how to add 128- bit encryption and to authenticate your web site with VeriSign's FREE guide!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yQix2C/33_CAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Next message: Fred Cohen: "[iwar] [fc:Ebola-style.killer.virus.sweeps.Afghan.border]"
Previous message: Fred Cohen: "[iwar] [fc:Implications.of.a.Palestinian.state.for.Israeli.security.and.nuclear.war:.A.Jurisprudential.Assessment]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 20:59:53 PST