[iwar] The Bush Plan on Afghanastan

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2001-10-04 06:50:53


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-2681-1002203326-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 04 Oct 2001 06:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 18184 invoked by uid 510); 4 Oct 2001 13:51:01 -0000
Received: from n31.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.81) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2001 13:51:01 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-2681-1002203326-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.1.221] by n31.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Oct 2001 13:50:55 -0000
X-Sender: fc@big.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 4 Oct 2001 13:48:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 95292 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2001 13:48:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by 10.1.1.221 with QMQP; 4 Oct 2001 13:48:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO big.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta1 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2001 13:50:53 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by big.all.net (8.9.3/8.7.3) id GAA28027 for iwar@onelist.com; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 06:50:53 -0700
Message-Id: <200110041350.GAA28027@big.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 06:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iwar] The Bush Plan on Afghanastan
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

PLAN SPARES CIVILIAN STRUCTURES

Rowan Scarborough
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

-----------------------------------------------------------

The Bush administration is putting final touches on a bombing plan
against Afghanistan's Taliban militia that will spare civilian
infrastructure such as electrical grids, bridges and water supplies,
U.S.  officials say. 

"The 'center of gravity' is not bridges.  It's the Taliban," said one
administration official, using the military's term for an enemy target. 

In previous U.S.-led bombing campaigns, such as those against Iraq and
Serbia, the Pentagon worked off a broad, or strategic, target list. 
Targets included bridges, roads, electrical generators and, in some
cases, central water supplies. 

Officials say the impending campaign, relying on a growing arsenal of
"smart" munitions, will attempt to surgically separate the ruling
Taliban militia from Afghan society.  Targets include the military that
supports the terrorists, along with Taliban headquarters, meeting places
and known hide-outs. 

President Bush has stopped short of saying his war on terrorism has a
goal of removing the Taliban, but officials have indicated that one
objective of air strikes will be to destroy the Taliban's command and
control capabilities.  The destruction would make the regime vulnerable
to an uprising from various anti-Taliban factions, most notably the
Northern Alliance. 

Sparing civilian infrastructure also will allow the Bush administration
to show that the strikes are not part of a war against the Afghan
people, but rather against the radical Taliban government. 

The Taliban admits to harboring Osama bin Laden, who the United States
says orchestrated the Sept.  11 hijacked airliner attacks on the World
Trade Center and the Pentagon. 

Mr.  Bush has announced U.S.  policy to treat regimes that harbor
terrorists the same as the perpetrators themselves. 

Another bombing objective is to spur bin Laden, and top members of his
al Qaeda terror network, to run.  A moving target, officials say, is
easier to locate and kill or capture. 

"Take away his protectors, the Taliban, and he must run," said one
official. 

Another administration source said, "Make it so he can't spend the same
night in the same place twice."

War strategists have anticipated that bin Laden may be located hiding in
a cave.  A quick air strike, an official said, could turn the tunnel
into bin Laden's permanent tomb. 

Taking down the Taliban, an official said, "will send a message to any
other government in the world that is even remotely thinking about
hosting terrorists on their soil."

The United States has aimed an array of intelligence assets on
Afghanistan to create a bombing target list and to locate bin Laden. 

Defense Secretary Donald H.  Rumsfeld said yesterday the United States
has some indication of bin Laden's whereabouts, but not his
"coordinates." Planners would need the coordinates to order an air
strike at bin Laden. 

In addition to striking Taliban's infrastructure, U.S.  and British
warplanes would hit military assets such as air defense networks, MiG
fighters and tanks. 

 Also on the list is al Qaeda's large network of terrorist training
camps, complete with bunkers and connecting tunnels. 

The U.S.  military has augmented its arsenal of precision-guided
munitions since the 1991 Gulf war.  Besides laser-guided weapons and
cruise missiles, Air Force bombers carry the Joint Direct Attack
Munition (JDAMs). 

The 1,000- and 2,000-pound bombs are guided by satellite coordinates,
and thus are not subject to poor weather conditions that can misdirect
the laser beams. 

Pentagon officials say the air war is being planned through a classic
chain of command. 

U.S.  Central Command, which oversees military operations in the Persian
Gulf and Central Asia, has been drawing up the master target list. 

 The targets have been submitted to the Joint Chiefs of Staff, whose
Joint Staff, and the military services, have submitted ideas.  The list
has been briefed several times to Mr.  Rumsfeld and the White House. 

Mr.  Rumsfeld has sent conflicting signals on an air campaign.  At one
point, he publicly doubted there was much of value to bomb in
Afghanistan, an arid, impoverished country locked in destructive civil
wars for decades. 

Asked on Sept.  18 how he planned to strike Afghanistan, the defense
secretary answered, "I think that one has to find ways to alter
behavior.  And as I've indicated, that runs across the spectrum.  You're
quite right; Afghanistan is a very poor country.  It is a country that
has had — several countries have exhausted themselves pounding that
country and fighting.  So it is — there are not great things of value
that are easy to deal with."

But that same week, he signed deployment orders sending about 150 Air
Force planes to the region, including heavy B-52 and B-1B bombers. 

A week later, he described the war on terrorism this way: "It is by its
very nature something that cannot be dealt with by some sort of a
massive attack or invasion.  It is a much more subtle, nuanced,
difficult, shadowy set of problems."

In addition to the Air Force aircraft, two Navy carriers are in the
area, with two more en route, meaning a potential naval air force of
nearly 300 planes. 

-----------------------------------------------------------
This article was mailed from The Washington Times
(http://www.washtimes.com/national/20011004-31834294.htm) For more great
articles, visit us at http://www.washtimes.com

Copyright (c) 2001 News World Communications, Inc.  All rights reserved. 

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Pinpoint the right security solution for your company- Learn how to add 128- bit encryption and to authenticate your web site with VeriSign's FREE guide!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yQix2C/33_CAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 20:59:53 PST