Return-Path: <sentto-279987-2793-1002586440-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 08 Oct 2001 17:15:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 11848 invoked by uid 510); 9 Oct 2001 00:13:59 -0000 Received: from n23.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.73) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 9 Oct 2001 00:13:59 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-2793-1002586440-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.4.53] by n23.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Oct 2001 00:14:00 -0000 X-Sender: fc@big.all.net X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 9 Oct 2001 00:14:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 76737 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2001 00:13:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 9 Oct 2001 00:13:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO big.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta2 with SMTP; 9 Oct 2001 00:13:30 -0000 Received: (from fc@localhost) by big.all.net (8.9.3/8.7.3) id RAA16569 for iwar@onelist.com; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 17:13:29 -0700 Message-Id: <200110090013.RAA16569@big.all.net> To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List) Organization: I'm not allowed to say X-Mailer: don't even ask X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net> Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 17:13:28 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Subject: [iwar] [fc:Internet.Event.Advisory.-.South.Asia] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Matrix ----------------------------------------------------------------- Since early morning on 8 October, Internet transmissions from Pakistan (via pk.ibm.net) have experienced a great increase in packet loss. Almost simultaneously, there has been a decrease in latency for Internet traffic in Kazakhstan. Moreover, a large number of sites in Saudi Arabia have become unreachable. These anomalies occurred at the time of the second military strike on Afghanistan. In all likelihood, the packet losses are the result of transmissions switching to a phone network. The lack of contact with Saudi Arabia may be intentional: either preserving Internet silence for security reasons, or merely refusing network pings. The increase in speed (latency decrease) for Kazakhstan is very likely the result of military operations personnel establishing faster links (on nursat.net) once the operation had begun. ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get your FREE VeriSign guide to security solutions for your web site: encrypting transactions, securing intranets, and more! http://us.click.yahoo.com/UnN2wB/m5_CAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 20:59:54 PST