[iwar] [fc:U.S..Shores.Up.Cyber.Security.Bastion.]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2001-10-10 18:42:18


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-2857-1002764539-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 10 Oct 2001 18:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 11984 invoked by uid 510); 11 Oct 2001 01:42:11 -0000
Received: from n27.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.77) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 11 Oct 2001 01:42:11 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-2857-1002764539-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.1.222] by n27.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Oct 2001 01:42:19 -0000
X-Sender: fc@big.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 11 Oct 2001 01:42:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 73789 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2001 01:42:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by 10.1.1.222 with QMQP; 11 Oct 2001 01:42:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO big.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta3 with SMTP; 11 Oct 2001 01:42:19 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by big.all.net (8.9.3/8.7.3) id SAA09482 for iwar@onelist.com; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 18:42:18 -0700
Message-Id: <200110110142.SAA09482@big.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 18:42:18 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iwar] [fc:U.S..Shores.Up.Cyber.Security.Bastion.]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

U.S. Shores Up Cyber Security Bastion. 
Intelligence Newsletter, 10/10/2001
No URL available

As could have been foreseen, the new Republican administration's policy
with regard anti-missile defenses makes the security of critical
American infrastructure--energy, telecommunications, water supply,
transportation and financial services-- more crucial than ever.  To be
sure, building a shield against ballistic missile attack could be seen
as increasing the risk that a potential enemy, deterred by military
muscle, might choose instead to assault U.S.  vital interests via
electronic networks.  Although the risk is theoretical it has
nonetheless galvanized the Pentagon's bureaucracy and the National
Security Council (NSC), which justify their existence - and their
budgets - on their capacity to foresee future risks, no matter how
hypothetical. 

Early last month, George W.  Bush's staff decided to step up efforts to
draft a new program based on electronic security to protect critical
infrastructure.  During a one hour meeting at the White House national
security adviser Condoleeza Rice was asked to prepare a draft executive
order that would harden up initiatives and lead to the founding of a new
coordinating body named the Critical Infrastructure Protection and
Continuity Board (CIPCB).  Intelligence Newsletter has obtained a copy
of the draft order that will be officially unveiled in mid-September and
come into force on Oct.  1.  Entitled Draft Executive Order on Critical
Infrastructure Protection in the Information Age, it identifies computer
security as the leading bastion against attack on vital interests (most
industrial countries consider such security one barrier among others). 
The document calls on the new agency, CICB, to fulfill two inter
-governmental management missions: see to the continuity of government
and operations in an emergency and supervise the security of information
systems. 

As a sign of the Bush administration's priorities, the order gives the
future CIPCB chairman the title of Senior Advisor to the President for
Cyberspace Security, a function that is currently held, under another
name, by Richard Clarke.  Next, the executive order hands operational
responsibility to several federal agencies but lays down specific
arrangements for information systems. 

For instance, the Federal Emergency Management Agency will have primary
responsibility for continuity of operations (energy, transportation and
the like) but other agencies will see to the security of the
government's communications systems and computers.  On one hand, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) will be responsible for the
"security of information systems that support executive branch
departments and agencies"(essentially civilian departments ).  On the
other, the defense secretary and CIA director will remain responsible
for the safeguarding of national security information systems, chiefly
the networks of the Pentagon, CIA and FBI. 

To protect information systems in a wider context, the order aims to
beef up cooperation between the administration and corporate America. 
The CIPCB chairman will be asked to work closely with private sector
presidential advisory panels like the National Security
Telecommunications Advisory Committee (NSTAC) and the National
Infrastructure Advisory Committee.  Up to now the public-private
partnership on infrastructure has focused on such key sectors as
telecommunications, information and transportation but the "outreach"
will be extended to academia, the legal profession, auditing, insurance
and "other relevant elements of society."

On a more political level, the executive order terminates the mandate of
current members of NIAC from Oct.  1 in order to ensure the influential
panel is dominated in future by Republicans.  Shortly before leaving the
White House in January, Bill Clinton named a number of his political
friends to the panel. 


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Pinpoint the right security solution for your company- Learn how to add 128- bit encryption and to authenticate your web site with VeriSign's FREE guide!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yQix2C/33_CAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 20:59:54 PST