[iwar] [fc:Homeland.Security.Czar.Lacks.Clout]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2001-10-15 07:00:03


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-2955-1003154408-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 15 Oct 2001 07:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 4754 invoked by uid 510); 15 Oct 2001 13:59:51 -0000
Received: from n11.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.61) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 15 Oct 2001 13:59:51 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-2955-1003154408-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.1.223] by n11.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Oct 2001 14:00:08 -0000
X-Sender: fc@big.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 15 Oct 2001 14:00:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 66115 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2001 14:00:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by 10.1.1.223 with QMQP; 15 Oct 2001 14:00:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO big.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta3 with SMTP; 15 Oct 2001 14:00:07 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by big.all.net (8.9.3/8.7.3) id HAA07069 for iwar@onelist.com; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 07:00:04 -0700
Message-Id: <200110151400.HAA07069@big.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 07:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iwar] [fc:Homeland.Security.Czar.Lacks.Clout]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Clout; Post Lacks it

USA Today, October 9, 2001

Paul Light, Vice President and Director, Governmental Studies Director,
Center for Public Service

Tom Ridge has faced many challenges in his long public-service career,
not the least of which was as a Marine in Vietnam.  But he may have met
his match in trying to bulldoze the bureaucratic turf that surrounds his
call to strengthen homeland security.  Armed only with the power to
persuade, Ridge must coordinate a group of agencies that have short
incentives to work together and long histories of working apart. 

Ridge does have the president's confidence, but his appointment as a
member of the president's Cabinet is only honorary, and he can only make
recommendations for action, not implement them.  He has no sticks to use
against his adversaries and no carrots to offer his friends.  As a
member of the White House staff, he serves at the pleasure of the
president and cannot testify before Congress on the budget or personnel
needs of the agencies he oversees. 

The only power he has is access to the president, but it is a power he
shares with dozens of other White House staffers, and one he dare not
use.  The first time he asks the president to intervene on his behalf
with some recalcitrant department head will be the last time he is taken
seriously.  Although he will have a West Wing office, the word is that
he will spend most of his time with his staff over in the Old Executive
Office Building across the alley.  And when he is not in the West Wing,
he might as well be in Baltimore. 

This is not to discount Ridge's considerable experience and persuasive
muscle.  But there is only so much a single adviser can do to flatten
the barriers to cooperation without the keys to the bulldozer.  Congress
could easily help its former colleague by giving Ridge real Cabinet
status as the director of a new Office of Homeland Security within the
Executive Office of the President. 

As a Senate-confirmed appointee, Ridge could testify on the adequacy of
agency responses, a significant lever for securing agencies' attention. 
He could also be given a mandate to certify the budget requests of each
agency he oversees, another lever. 

At the end of the day, there are only two things that matter in
bureaucratic politics: money and personnel.  Under the president's
order, Ridge will have little influence over either.  This is a time to
give Ridge every opportunity to succeed, not create a challenge that can
be met only through a long campaign against bureaucratic inertia. 

Paul C.  Light is Vice President and Director of Governmental Studies at
the Brookings Institution and Senior Adviser to The Presidential
Appointee Initiative. 

© Copyright 2001 USA TODAY, a division of Gannett Co.  Inc. 

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Pinpoint the right security solution for your company- Learn how to add 128- bit encryption and to authenticate your web site with VeriSign's FREE guide!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yQix2C/33_CAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 20:59:55 PST