Return-Path: <sentto-279987-3000-1003240377-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 16 Oct 2001 06:54:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 31248 invoked by uid 510); 16 Oct 2001 13:52:39 -0000 Received: from n20.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.70) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 16 Oct 2001 13:52:39 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-3000-1003240377-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.4.55] by n20.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Oct 2001 13:52:57 -0000 X-Sender: fc@big.all.net X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 16 Oct 2001 13:52:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 91306 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2001 13:52:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 16 Oct 2001 13:52:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO big.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta2 with SMTP; 16 Oct 2001 13:52:54 -0000 Received: (from fc@localhost) by big.all.net (8.9.3/8.7.3) id GAA19058 for iwar@onelist.com; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 06:52:53 -0700 Message-Id: <200110161352.GAA19058@big.all.net> To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List) Organization: I'm not allowed to say X-Mailer: don't even ask X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net> X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 06:52:53 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Subject: [iwar] [fc:WSJ.Europe.-.The.Art.of.War] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Wall Street Journal Europe October 16, 2001 The Art Of War Since the U.S. bombing campaign started in Afghanistan, a second front has opened within the hearts and minds of the Islamic world. The exchanges of words across the ether are now as critical as exchanges of artillery fire on the ground in Afghanistan. And if the early skirmishes are any indication, it will be fascinating to watch the world's most information-saturated democracy and a theocratic regime that outlawed television waging propaganda war. Some have already made much of the challenges facing the U.S. in getting its message out in the Muslim world. Skepticism greeted news last week that George W. Bush was considering a broadcast on the Qatar-based Al Jazeera. And it may well be that the enmity toward the U.S. is strong enough in the Muslim world that direct appearances by George Bush or Tony Blair will do little good. But the U.S. doesn't necessarily have to win the information war in the Arab world, bin Laden seems to be doing a fine job losing it without any help. Despite concerns about the U.S. stations broadcasting bin Laden's taped statements for fear they might include messages to his followers, the terrorist mastermind's appearances so far have actually done much good by revealing the failure of his message. That's because the jihad he tried to stir in Muslim countries across the Middle East and South Asia has failed to materialize. Relatively small numbers of people have turned out on the streets to burn effigies, but the broader society hasn't rallied behind the cause. So the U.S. cause isn't hurt by the video images of rioting radicals enjoying their moment in the sun. For moderate Muslims, evidence that only the radical few who have long threatened their way of life are leading the bin Laden charge is a cue to dig in and wait for the fury to die down. Meanwhile, Bin Laden's speech even derailed the natural propaganda working for him in the Muslim world: conspiracy theories implicating the Israeli Mossad and others were also squashed when he all but took responsibility for the attacks. Of course, the propagandizing of al Qaeda and the Taliban isn't exclusively targeted at Muslims. Known for mass executions and oppression of women, the Taliban has of late been lamenting the tragic loss of civilian life during the missile attacks. Taliban spokesmen have even learned the lingo developed in recent years by Europeans and others who criticize the U.S., calling it a "global bully." But many overt efforts by the Arab world to use the Western media to further their propaganda campaign in the Arab world are failing as well. Last week, the story of an Afghan teenager who claimed to have lost a leg in a U.S. missile attack was picked up by numerous news agencies. Unicef even used a picture of the 16-year old as part of a solicitation for donations to help Afghan children. Only there was one problem: the whole thing was a hoax. The boy later admitted he lost his foot in a landmine explosion. The control of information in this war is different from any in the past. During the Gulf War, the U.S.'s most recent full-scale mobilization, the Internet was still at a primitive stage. This propaganda war will be fought on many fronts -- from airdropped leaflets to edited videos. But in the end, the old rules will apply. As Hubert Humphrey once put it, "Propaganda, to be effective, must be believed. To be believed, it must be credible. To be credible, it must be true." ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Pinpoint the right security solution for your company- Learn how to add 128- bit encryption and to authenticate your web site with VeriSign's FREE guide! http://us.click.yahoo.com/yQix2C/33_CAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 20:59:55 PST