[iwar] [fc:Loud.U.S..Gunships.Wage.War.On.Psychological.Level,.Too]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2001-10-18 08:31:22


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-3092-1003419086-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 18 Oct 2001 08:32:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 18491 invoked by uid 510); 18 Oct 2001 15:31:04 -0000
Received: from n1.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.51) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 18 Oct 2001 15:31:04 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-3092-1003419086-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.1.221] by n1.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Oct 2001 15:31:26 -0000
X-Sender: fc@big.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 18 Oct 2001 15:31:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 1526 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2001 15:31:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by 10.1.1.221 with QMQP; 18 Oct 2001 15:31:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO big.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta1 with SMTP; 18 Oct 2001 15:31:25 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by big.all.net (8.9.3/8.7.3) id IAA14297 for iwar@onelist.com; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 08:31:24 -0700
Message-Id: <200110181531.IAA14297@big.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 08:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iwar] [fc:Loud.U.S..Gunships.Wage.War.On.Psychological.Level,.Too]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Norfolk Virginian-Pilot
October 17, 2001
Loud U.S. Gunships Wage War On Psychological Level, Too 
By Dale Eisman, The Virginian-Pilot 
WASHINGTON -- A pair of Air Force AC-130 Spectre gunships, their port sides
bristling with cannons, gatling guns, even a howitzer, joined in Monday's
attacks on the Taliban, swooping in to pour fire on troops and facilities
and trying, U.S. officials acknowledged, to put a serious scare into their
targets.
Loud and slow-moving, the converted cargo planes provide an easy target for
anti-aircraft batteries and surface-to-air missiles, and they may seem out
of place at a time when the U.S. military is placing a premium on speed and
stealth in the air.
But military planners say the planes' use over Afghanistan underscores
America's confidence that it controls those skies and will use them to
deliver relentless, punishing attacks on troops as well as the quick strikes
fighter aircraft have been directing at ammunition dumps, radar sites and
command centers.
``There is a psychological effect in all that we're trying to do. . . ''
Marine Corps. Lt. Gen. Gregory S. Newbold told reporters Tuesday. The AC-130
``provides a presence that is visible, or at least audible,'' Newbold added.
``And for that reason it has psychological impact. . . . The moral is to the
physical as three is to one, and the psychological effect here is very
important.'' The AC-130's guns can be precisely aimed, even from high
altitude, to limit collateral damage, said Newbold, operations director for
the Pentagon's Joint Staff.
With a range of more than 1,500 miles, the planes can loiter for hours over
a battlefield to pick off ground forces as they emerge.
Each of the gunships carries a crew of 14, including four gunners, and
specialists trained to operate satellite navigation equipment, sensors and a
television camera that scans the ground closely, even in near darkness.
Those systems help the AC-130 locate and destroy targets that are missed by
fighters passing over the battlefield at 300 knots, Newbold said.
Early versions of the AC-130 are credited with destroying about 10,000
vehicles during the Vietnam War, according to GlobalSecurity.org, an
Internet site devoted to analyzing military programs. They also provided air
cover for ground forces during the U.S. attacks on Grenada and Panama in the
1980s and saw action over Somalia and Bosnia in the 1990s.
The Air Force has 13 of the newest models, the AC-130U. It has been in
service since the mid-1990s and is ``the most complex aircraft weapon system
in the world,'' GlobalSecurity says on its Web site. ``It has more than
609,000 lines of code in its mission computers and avionics systems.''
Though the Air Force's total fleet of 21 AC-130s is attached to the
service's ``special operations command,'' Newbold cautioned that their use
isn't necessarily a sign that the United States is about to call on its
special forces troops for ground operations.
The AC-130's infrared sensors are particularly useful in night operations --
the Air Force typically uses the aircraft under cover of darkness -- and the
United States can equip friendly forces on the ground with tags that will
allow the sensors to distinguish them from enemy troops who may be just a
few yards away.
Newbold sidestepped a question on whether troops of the Afghan Northern
Alliance, which the United States is supporting against the Taliban, have
been given those tags. ``I wouldn't eliminate any capability from causing
worry and anxiety to the Taliban leadership. Because sooner or later they're
going to have to worry about it,'' he said. 

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get your FREE VeriSign guide to security solutions for your web site: encrypting transactions, securing intranets, and more!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/UnN2wB/m5_CAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 20:59:55 PST