Return-Path: <sentto-279987-3102-1003420299-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 18 Oct 2001 08:53:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 19556 invoked by uid 510); 18 Oct 2001 15:51:17 -0000 Received: from n31.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.81) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 18 Oct 2001 15:51:17 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-3102-1003420299-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.1.220] by n31.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Oct 2001 15:51:39 -0000 X-Sender: fc@big.all.net X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 18 Oct 2001 15:51:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 36518 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2001 15:51:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by 10.1.1.220 with QMQP; 18 Oct 2001 15:51:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO big.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta2 with SMTP; 18 Oct 2001 15:51:38 -0000 Received: (from fc@localhost) by big.all.net (8.9.3/8.7.3) id IAA14756 for iwar@onelist.com; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 08:51:37 -0700 Message-Id: <200110181551.IAA14756@big.all.net> To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List) Organization: I'm not allowed to say X-Mailer: don't even ask X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net> X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 08:51:37 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Subject: [iwar] [fc:E-Government..Security.Experts.Decry.Lack.Of.Information-Sharing] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit E-Government Security Experts Decry Lack Of Information-Sharing By Maureen Sirhal, National Journal, 10/18/2001 <a href="http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/techdaily/pmedition/tp011017.htm#2">http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/techdaily/pmedition/tp011017.htm#2> The government must craft a policy that encourages the effective management and sharing of information between federal agencies to help prevent terrorist attacks, two former national security officials said Wednesday. Former Clinton administration National Security Adviser Samuel (Sandy) Berger, speaking at a technology conference sponsored by WebMethods, said the lack of information-sharing enabled some terrorists responsible for the Sept. 11 attacks to remain in the United States despite the fact that their names appeared on "watch lists." "The first dollar I would spend [to combat terrorism] would be on data integration," Berger said. "We have to have the capacity in real time for the INS [Immigration and Naturalization Service], for the Customs Service, for law enforcement and for the intelligence community to intelligently share information." The Clinton administration tried to improve information-sharing, Berger said. For example, the FBI and the CIA agreed to exchange top-level people and allocate resources to boosting intelligence between agencies. But "policy issues" created hurdles that have inhibited effective data integration. "None of them are insurmountable," Berger said, "and all of them we've got to blow through one way or another." He said dozens of government databases are incompatible because they function on several platforms and with different software and standards. Policy restrictions on the sharing of sensitive information between law enforcement organizations and national security agencies also complicate communication. To boost information-sharing, agencies must ensure adequate cyber security, said R. James Woolsey, a former CIA director under former President Clinton. Woolsey said only some departments have addressed cyber security. "We need to do some very hard thinking about how we manage our infrastructure," he said. "Much of our ability to deal successfully with the war [against terrorism] ... will depend upon the speed and adaptability of American business, particularly in the high-tech sector, and whether it is able to do some of the kinds of things that this country has done" in past conflicts. Berger acknowledged that information-sharing does have its limits because of national security. "How much data can the CIA really share? If you are going to have integrated databases," he said, "that means a lot of more people are going to have a lot of access to a lot of information." Woolsey cautioned that any e-government proposal, including plans to create a government-only Internet dubbed Govnet, needs to encompass technology to authenticate the identities of federal workers who access information. The problem, he said, is that not everyone in government is loyal. "If once you get into [Govnet] you have pretty much free access, you haven't really solved the problem." "Obviously you are not just going to create one big database and give everyone a password," Berger added. "This has got to multiple systems, variegated systems. It has to have different access for people." Woolsey said he envisions the need for national identification cards to "keep track" of citizens, but he added that any such plan must balance law enforcement needs and civil liberties. ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 20:59:55 PST