[iwar] Reluctant UN joins the fray

From: yangyun@metacrawler.com
Date: 2001-10-21 02:34:37


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-3182-1003656880-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 21 Oct 2001 02:36:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 30636 invoked by uid 510); 21 Oct 2001 09:34:13 -0000
Received: from n33.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.83) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2001 09:34:13 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-3182-1003656880-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.1.221] by n33.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Oct 2001 09:34:40 -0000
X-Sender: yangyun@metacrawler.com
X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 21 Oct 2001 09:34:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 97149 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2001 09:34:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by 10.1.1.221 with QMQP; 21 Oct 2001 09:34:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n34.groups.yahoo.com) (10.1.1.30) by mta1 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2001 09:34:40 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: yangyun@metacrawler.com
Received: from [10.1.10.99] by n34.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Oct 2001 09:34:40 -0000
To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Message-ID: <9qu4rd+deht@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 24.112.32.13
From: yangyun@metacrawler.com
X-Yahoo-Profile: televr
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 09:34:37 -0000
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iwar] Reluctant UN joins the fray
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reluctant UN joins the fray 

War in Afghanistan: Observer special
War on Terrorism: Observer special 

Tim Judah in Khoja Bahoudin, Afghanistan
Sunday October 21, 2001
The Observer 

Immediately after the two planes smashed into the World Trade Centre 
buildings on 11 September the emergency procedures at the United 
Nations headquarters building on the East River went into operation. 
Staff at first were ushered into the basement, then sent home after an 
hour or so. But, in the weeks that followed, UN watchers began to 
wonder if they had ever really returned. 

Right after the attacks Kofi Annan, the UN Secretary General, issued 
ritual condolences and condemnations, but, with the world in crisis, the 
UN seemed conspicuous by its absence - at least in public. 

Now, as US and British planes pound Afghanistan, sources at UN 
headquarters say Annan has ordered his political affairs officials to shift 
into high gear. An emergency task force has been set up to formulate 
responses to the war on terrorism. But there is mounting disquiet 
among UN officials. They are terrified that the US has begun moves to 
dump responsibility for sorting out the mess that will be post-war 
Afghanistan on the UN. 

The Integrated Mission Taskforce (IMT) is co-ordinating the work of top 
UN officials dealing with the crisis. 'Given our past experience,' said a 
UN staffer who asked for anonymity, 'we are trying to be prepared this 
time.' 

Annan and Lakhdar Brahimi - his Special Representative for 
Afghanistan, and a former Algerian Foreign Minister - held a meeting on 
Thursday with Richard Haass, the US State Department official in 
charge of Afghanistan, and John Negroponte, the US Ambassador to 
the UN. The next day Brahimi held talks with the US administration in 
Washington. 

Over the past few days Colin Powell, the US Secretary of State, has 
mooted the idea of a post-Taliban UN peacekeeping force for 
Afghanistan. But UN officials are horrified by the idea. They fear being 
stuck with trying to sort out an almost impossible mess, the legacy of 
22 years of war. 

'We have been burned too often,' said the source, referring to the UN 
missions in Bosnia and Croatia between 1991-95. Officials are still 
bitter about these, believing the US undermined them and that the UN 
was then blamed for their failure. Now UN officials are loath to mount 
a 'mission impossible' just to help the US. 

Even the fact that President George W. Bush has suddenly told Annan 
that the US will pay the bulk of its longstanding arrears to the world 
body is not helping assuage UN scepticism. 

'What have they got in mind?' asked the source. 'For how long? What 
would the mandate be? The US would like to move quickly and declare 
a situation where the UN takes over but we are saying this cannot be 
rushed. The conditions are not there to think of deploying troops, let 
alone anything else.' 

One idea mooted is that the UN could take a similar role to the one it 
played in Cambodia, in the run-up to the elections it supervised in May 
1993. There, a peace process became possible because the great 
powers and Cambodia's neighbours concluded that the conflict had 
gone on too long. This consensus meant they were able to compel the 
Khmer Rouge, the Vietnamese-backed government and Prince 
Sihanouk, the former monarch, to make a deal. 

In the wake of that agreement a UN peacekeeping force poured into the 
country alongside UN administrators, who ran the country until elections 
were held. 

Superficially there are comparisons. The great powers, and 
Afghanistan's neighbours, want an end to the conflict and probably have 
the power to compel the warring factions to come to the table. Afghans 
are exhausted by the war just as Cambodians were. And, just as a 
former monarch presided over the transition in Cambodia, Afghanistan's 
former king, the exiled 86-year-old Zahir Shah, could play a similar role. 

But that is where the similarities end. A crucial difference is that in 
Cambodia the conflict was not overlaid with deep ethnic splits as it is in 
Afghanistan. And as the UN source points out: 'In Cambodia you had a 
framework for peace. In Afghanistan you don't.' 

When he visited Islamabad on Tuesday Colin Powell appeared to 
endorse the proposal of Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf that a 
future government of Afghanistan should include 'moderate Taliban 
elements'. This enrages Northern Alliance officials such as Abdullah 
Abdullah, the Foreign Minister of the anti-Taliban alliance, who says 
there is no such thing as a 'moderate Taliban element'. 

In the Panjsher valley, Northern Alliance officials are now choosing 60 
delegates who are to be joined by another 60 representing Zahir Shah. 
Their job will be to form a Grand Council, whose aim is to prepare an 
administration and broaden the base of the anti-Taliban coalition to 
include Pashtuns, the largest single ethnic group in the country. 

Given the diplomatic dynamics, it is quite possible the moves afoot at 
the UN, the US and in the Panjsher valley will come together. This may 
well result in a UN force for Afghanistan and aid in rebuilding the 
country's shattered administration and economy. 





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get your FREE VeriSign guide to security solutions for your web site: encrypting transactions, securing intranets, and more!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/UnN2wB/m5_CAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 20:59:56 PST