Return-Path: <sentto-279987-3331-1003879856-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 23 Oct 2001 16:32:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 10047 invoked by uid 510); 23 Oct 2001 23:30:25 -0000 Received: from n29.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.79) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 23 Oct 2001 23:30:25 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-3331-1003879856-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.1.223] by n29.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Oct 2001 23:30:56 -0000 X-Sender: fc@red.all.net X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 23 Oct 2001 23:30:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 30734 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2001 23:30:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by 10.1.1.223 with QMQP; 23 Oct 2001 23:30:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO red.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta1 with SMTP; 23 Oct 2001 23:30:56 -0000 Received: (from fc@localhost) by red.all.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f9NNVJs28005 for iwar@onelist.com; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 16:31:19 -0700 Message-Id: <200110232331.f9NNVJs28005@red.all.net> To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List) Organization: I'm not allowed to say X-Mailer: don't even ask X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net> X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 16:31:19 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Subject: [iwar] [fc:U.S..Pressure.on.Israel.Is.Misguided] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit U.S. Pressure on Israel Is Misguided By Yossi Klein Halevi Yossi Klein Halevi is the author, most recently, of "At the Entrance to the Garden of Eden: A Jew's Search for God with Christians and Muslims in the Holy Land." October 23, 2001 JUST AS AMERICA and Israel should be drawing into deeper strategic and emotional affinity, the war against terrorism has opened new and potentially dangerous rifts between the two nations. In its desperation to find allies within the Muslim world, America has angered Israel by distancing it from the anti-terrorism coalition, even as it woos terror states such as Iran and Syria. And in its current incursion into West Bank towns following the assassination of Tourism Minister Rehavam Ze'evi last Wednesday in Jerusalem, Israel has angered Washington, which fears the escalation will intensify Muslim resentment against the United States. Until the Ze'evi murder, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon had, in fact, shown sensitivity to America's dilemma. Despite intense pressure from the Israeli right - led by Ze'evi - Sharon quietly suspended Israel's policy of targeting terrorists. And he withdrew Israeli troops from an Arab neighborhood in Hebron where Palestinian gunmen had fired into a crowd of Jewish pilgrims at the Tomb of the Patriarchs, burial place of Abraham and Sarah. The very day before his assassination, Ze'evi had resigned from the government in protest against Sharon's moderate line. But the unprecedented terrorist attack on an Israeli cabinet minister - and the ease with which the assassins entered a Jerusalem hotel and then escaped to nearby Palestinian-controlled territory - reminded Israelis just how vulnerable Israel has become since the Oslo process began. The upgrading of the terrorists' operational capacity is a direct result of the empowerment of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat, under whose watch the terror organizations have thrived. The current Israeli incursion is a long-delayed response to that growing threat. Another factor in loosening Israeli restraint has been the Bush administration's recent endorsement of a Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital. Until a year ago, the Israeli mainstream might have been persuaded to accept that solution. But after Arafat's year-long terrorist holy war, few in Israel are willing to accept him any longer as a peace partner - let alone as an intimate neighbor in Jerusalem. By raising the nightmare of Arafat's further empowerment, Bush compounded the insult of Israel's exclusion from the anti-terrorist coalition. The final blow came with the revelation that the administration had informed Arab countries, but not Israel, about the new American initiative. That triggered Sharon's angry declaration that Israel wouldn't become a second Czechoslovakia, a victim of appeasement. Perhaps recognizing that it had gone too far in alienating Israel, the Bush administration responded forcefully to the Ze'evi assassination - explicitly linking, for the first time since Sept. 11, the struggles against terrorism being fought by Israel and the United States. But Washington cannot continue to treat Israel as a pariah and threaten it with an imposed solution to the Palestinian problem, and then expect Israel to act like a responsible ally. Only by offering Israel reassurance that the Arab world won't benefit politically from Osama bin-Laden's terrorism will Sharon be able to resist the pressure from the political right to respond ever more forcefully to Palestinian provocations. Sharon would like nothing better than to once again dispatch Arafat into exile, just as he did during the 1982 invasion of Lebanon. And no one deserves that fate more than the Palestinian chairman, who has set back the chance for reconciliation between Palestinians and Israelis by a generation. Still, Sharon is unlikely to order the Israeli army to destroy the Palestinian Authority. Israel's goal, after all, is to pressure Arafat to act against terrorism. The Israeli public doesn't want to reoccupy the West Bank, and Sharon's Labor Party partners in the unity government won't permit it. American pressure, then, should be primarily aimed at Arafat who, unlike Sharon, has no domestic constraints nudging him toward restraint. Only external pressure can force Arafat to undertake a genuine crackdown on terrorism, and not the farcical "revolving door" whereby Arafat arrests terrorists and then quietly releases them when media attention subsides. More profoundly, Israel and the United States need to reach an understanding whereby Israel refrains from far-reaching acts that could inflame the Muslim world, while America refrains from imposing a political solution to the Palestinian-Israeli crisis. At this delicate moment, Israeli and American leaders need the wisdom of empathy, appreciating each other's predicaments and accommodating, as much as possible, each other's basic security needs. Copyright © 2001, Newsday, Inc. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get your FREE VeriSign guide to security solutions for your web site: encrypting transactions, securing intranets, and more! http://us.click.yahoo.com/UnN2wB/m5_CAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 20:59:56 PST