Return-Path: <sentto-279987-3372-1003944556-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com> Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by red.all.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f9OHkwd12035 for <fc@localhost>; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:46:58 -0700 Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:46:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 14923 invoked by uid 510); 24 Oct 2001 17:28:44 -0000 Received: from n33.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.83) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 24 Oct 2001 17:28:44 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-3372-1003944556-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.1.221] by n33.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Oct 2001 17:29:17 -0000 X-Sender: fc@red.all.net X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 24 Oct 2001 17:29:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 19177 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2001 17:29:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by 10.1.1.221 with QMQP; 24 Oct 2001 17:29:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO red.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta1 with SMTP; 24 Oct 2001 17:29:14 -0000 Received: (from fc@localhost) by red.all.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f9OHTf711688 for iwar@onelist.com; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:29:41 -0700 Message-Id: <200110241729.f9OHTf711688@red.all.net> To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List) Organization: I'm not allowed to say X-Mailer: don't even ask X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net> X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:29:40 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Subject: [iwar] [fc:In.Afghan.Caves,.Suburbs.Of.New.Jersey,.Problem's.The.Same:.Where's.The.Enemy?] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Wall Street Journal October 24, 2001 In Afghan Caves, Suburbs Of New Jersey, Problem's The Same: Where's The Enemy? By David S. Cloud and Neil King Jr., Staff Reporters Of The Wall Street Journal WASHINGTON -- President Bush has deployed all the resources the U.S. government can muster to respond to the anthrax attack at home and crush the terrorists in Afghanistan. But six weeks after Sept. 11, he still faces a fundamental problem: Neither police here nor troops there can find the bad guys. The president frequently points out that this is a "different kind of war." Much of what makes it different is that in this conflict, the enemy forces have no country and fly no flag. Instead, they hide in Afghan caves and New Jersey suburbs. Identifying them -- let alone finding them -- is proving exceedingly difficult. In Afghanistan, U.S. officials believe Mr. bin Laden and his core followers have scattered into the rugged mountains along the border with Pakistan, though they concede he could be almost anywhere in a country that is about the size of Texas. Also possible, but less likely, is that the Saudi exile has fled to similarly lawless territory in Pakistan or further afield in Yemen or Somalia. For all the firepower and high-tech spy gear U.S. forces have brought to bear in Afghanistan, their mission's success ultimately depends on finding Mr. bin Laden and his associates. And that, in turn, is likely to result not from weaponry, but from a snitch or a chance bit of intelligence. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said as much just before the bombing began, telling reporters that the "determining factor" wouldn't be a cruise missile or a bomber but "a scrap of information from some person." The hunt for the perpetrator of the anthrax attacks is proving just as tough. Federal Bureau of Investigation agents have traced several anthrax-laced letters to a postal route in Trenton. But officials believe the slow-developing nature of the attacks may have allowed the sender or senders to flee, leaving behind little hard evidence about whether the nation's first significant case of bioterrorism was planned by Mr. bin Laden's network or another foreign enemy -- or even some home-grown perpetrators inside the U.S. On Tuesday, several officials said they believe Mr. bin Laden's al Qaeda group is involved. House Minority Leader Richard Gephardt (D., Mo.) said there is a growing consensus that the anthrax mailings are related to the Sept. 11 attacks, while White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said, "There is a suspicion that this is connected to international terrorists." None suggested they had any proof, though. Law-enforcement officials working on the anthrax investigation say they hope that by blanketing the country with agents, they will get a break -- a home laboratory, perhaps, where the anthrax spores were prepared, or maybe an informant who can help crack the mystery. Otherwise, law-enforcement officials say, the anthrax case shows signs of being a difficult, time-consuming investigation. The FBI, the Central Intelligence Agency and other agencies face intense pressure to give Mr. Bush and his advisers an answer about who is behind the anthrax attacks as soon as possible. If it turns out to be the work of a foreign government, such as Iraq, the U.S. would be confronted with the possibility of widening a war now focused on eradicating Mr. bin Laden and the Taliban in Afghanistan. If the culprits are domestic terrorists with no connection to Mr. bin Laden, it would require the administration to commit extensive resources to separate, yet equally urgent, terrorism investigations. "I don't think the FBI has ever faced a national crisis like this, in which there was such pressure to solve this quickly," said Larry Torrance, the former deputy chief of the FBI's national-security division. Officials have said the anthrax attacks in New York, Washington and Florida involve a strain of the bacterium that is found commonly inside the U.S., and that shows no signs of having been genetically altered. Experts in biological weaponry say that could make it almost impossible to trace its exact source using scientific methods, unless there are genetic markers -- slight variations in the strain's gene structure -- that have been seen and catalogued before. Some FBI officials were concerned before Sept. 11 that the agency wasn't adequately equipped to investigate biological-terrorism attacks. Randall Murch, an FBI lab official now detailed to the Pentagon, warned in a paper released in January that the bureau and other federal agencies lacked adequate lab resources and expertise to quickly identify and trace the source of biological agents after an attack. "This nation will ... demand the rapid and accurate identification of the cause, the means and those involved," Dr. Murch said. "We are still a long way from having the needed forensics capabilities and resources." The biggest deficiency, he said, was the lack of a database capable of allowing the FBI to quickly trace strains of biological agents to their possible source. Law-enforcement officials are withholding most details about the anthrax strain, including what type it is. Without some kind of genetic signature to the bacteria, experts say, the investigation likely will hinge on old-fashioned detective work. It took the agency 17 years to arrest Unabomber Theodore Kaczynski. It wasn't until two years after the 1996 bombing during the Atlanta Olympics that federal officials charged antiabortion extremist Eric Rudolph with that crime. The FBI gained a full understanding of the Oklahoma City bombing case within months, but the agency started out with key bits of forensic evidence. Meanwhile, the military campaign in some ways looks increasingly traditional. U.S. bombers now are targeting the Taliban front lines outside Kabul in an effort to tilt the balance toward Northern Alliance rebels. Officials at the Pentagon talk of helping the rebels seize key cities in the north and possibly moving on the capital. But at its heart, the war still is focused on wiping out the country's terrorist base, and that means tracking down Mr. bin Laden's organization and the top brass of the ruling Taliban. Official support for anti-Taliban rebels, Bush aides say, is but another prong in the larger manhunt. Current and former U.S. intelligence officials believe Mr. bin Laden and his few hundred close followers who stayed behind in Afghanistan scattered into the countryside either before or just after the bombing campaign began. One U.S. official said there were indications Mr. bin Laden has scrapped his usual convoy of trucks and Land Cruisers in favor of horses and mules, and now changes his location every night, moving either between safe houses or from cave to cave in the Hindu Kush mountains. From Panama in 1989 to Somalia four years later, the U.S. has a spotty track record when it comes to military efforts to nab individuals. It took the U.S. five days and 23,0000 troops to apprehend Manuel Noriega in Panama City. In Somalia, U.S. Army Rangers lost 18 men and still failed in a monthlong effort to grab Gen. Mohammed Farah Aidid in a single congested neighborhood of Mogadishu. This time, the U.S. has deployed an unprecedented amount of state-of-the-art spying technology in and around Afghanistan, much of it for the express purpose of pinpointing Mr. bin Laden and his followers in 250,000 square miles of desert, rugged mountains and teeming cities such as Kabul and Kandahar. But few expect cameras or sensors will find Mr. bin Laden. The U.S. Air Force and the CIA have sent aloft over Afghanistan a squadron of some two dozen high-tech drones -- the Air Force's Predators and the CIA's Gnat -- to provide detailed and continuous footage of individuals and possible hiding places on the ground. Much higher up, the U.S. is also relying on a fleet of spy satellites capable of taking high-definition images of the countryside, including cameras that can detect objects only a few inches in size. Yet all of this technology has its drawbacks, leading many officials back to their hope that the real break will probably come from informants. Both the CIA and the State Department are offering money to anyone who comes forward with information. Others suggest the break could come through interrogating captured Taliban officials or bin Laden operatives. As one administration official put it, "One good turncoat could make all the difference." ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Pinpoint the right security solution for your company- Learn how to add 128- bit encryption and to authenticate your web site with VeriSign's FREE guide! http://us.click.yahoo.com/yQix2C/33_CAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 20:59:57 PST