[iwar] [fc:Additive.Made.Spores.Deadlier.3.Nations.Known.to.Be.Able.to.Make.Sophisticated.Coating]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2001-10-25 18:24:04


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-3432-1004059441-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 25 Oct 2001 18:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 28867 invoked by uid 510); 26 Oct 2001 01:23:26 -0000
Received: from n31.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.81) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2001 01:23:26 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-3432-1004059441-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.4.54] by n31.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Oct 2001 01:24:01 -0000
X-Sender: fc@red.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 26 Oct 2001 01:24:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 85114 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2001 01:24:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 26 Oct 2001 01:24:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO red.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta1 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2001 01:24:00 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by red.all.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f9Q1O4b21598 for iwar@onelist.com; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 18:24:04 -0700
Message-Id: <200110260124.f9Q1O4b21598@red.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 18:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iwar] [fc:Additive.Made.Spores.Deadlier.3.Nations.Known.to.Be.Able.to.Make.Sophisticated.Coating]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Additive Made Spores Deadlier 3 Nations Known to Be Able to Make Sophisticated Coating

By Rick Weiss and Dan Eggen Washington Post Staff Writers Thursday,
October 25, 2001; Page A01 

The anthrax spores that contaminated the air in Senate Majority Leader
Thomas A. Daschle's office had been treated with a chemical additive so
sophisticated that only three nations are thought to have been capable
of making it, sources said yesterday.

The United States, the former Soviet Union and Iraq are the only three
nations known to have developed the kind of additives that enable
anthrax spores to remain suspended in the air, making them more easily
inhaled and therefore more deadly, experts said yesterday. Each nation
used a different technique, suggesting that ongoing microscopic and
chemical analyses may reveal more about the spores' provenance than did
their genetic analysis, which is largely complete but reportedly has
done little to narrow the field.

A government official with direct knowledge of the investigation said
yesterday that the totality of the evidence in hand suggests that it is
unlikely that the spores were originally produced in the former Soviet
Union or Iraq.

Even identifying the kind of coating may not solve the crucial question
of who is perpetrating the terror, because little is known about how
secure the stores of the three countries' stocks have been during the
past few years.

Nonetheless, the conclusion that the spores were produced with military
quality differs considerably from public comments made recently by
officials close to the investigation, who have said the spores were not
"weaponized" and were "garden variety." Those descriptions may be
technically true, depending on how one defines those terms, several
experts said. But they obscure the basic and more important truth that
the spores were treated with a sophisticated process, meaning the
original source was almost certainly a state-sponsored laboratory.

The finding strongly suggests that the anthrax spores in the U.S. mail
attacks were not produced in a university or makeshift laboratory or
simply gathered from natural sources. But it does not answer the
question of whether a state-sponsored laboratory supplied the anthrax
spores directly to terrorists or simply lost control of some stocks in
recent years.

The presence of the high-grade additive was confirmed for the first time
yesterday by a government source familiar with the ongoing studies,
which are being conducted by scientists at the Army Medical Research
Institute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick in Frederick. Four
other experts in anthrax weapons said they had no doubt that such an
additive was present based on the high dispersal rate from the letter to
Daschle (D-S.D.).

"The evidence is patent on its face," said Alan Zelicoff, a senior
scientist at Sandia National Laboratories' Center for National Security
and Arms Control. "The amount of energy needed to disperse the spores
[by merely opening an envelope] was trivial, which is virtually
diagnostic of achieving the appropriate coating."

David Franz, formerly of USAMRIID and now at the Southern Research
Institute in Birmingham, said, "In order for a formulation to do what
the one in Daschle's office appears to have done -- be easily airborne
-- it would require special treatment."

Genetic testing of the spores found in Daschle's office, at NBC offices
in New York and in Florida found that the three samples were indistinguishable.

The ongoing USAMRIID studies on the spores used in the U.S. attacks
involve examinations using conventional microscopes and scanning
electron microscopes, along with complex chemical analyses that are
difficult to conduct even when the bacteria in question are not
dangerous. The analyses are far more difficult in this case, experts
said, because anthrax spores must be studied in specially sealed
laboratory enclosures to ensure that they do not escape.

Results of those tests have not been made public beyond a simple
description of how small the spore particles were in the Daschle letter.
That particle size, 1 1/2 to 3 microns in diameter, said Sen. Bill Frist
(R-Tenn.), is extremely small -- a first requirement for making "weapons
grade" anthrax spores for warfare or terrorism.

But more than that is needed to get anthrax spores to drift easily in
the air and spread widely without settling quickly to the ground. That
is because tiny particles tend to have electrostatic charges -- the
static electricity that can cause hair to extend skyward when it is
rubbed against a balloon. Those charges make the tiniest particles clump
together into heavier ones, which then settle to the ground.

One of the primary goals of bioweapons engineers since the 1960s was to
figure out how to treat those tiny particles in ways that would
neutralize the problematic charges. Properly processed, the tiny
particles will remain separated from one another and fly up and outward
with virtually no effort. An imperceptible wisp of a breeze can send
them across a room.

In the United States, that problem was solved by Bill Patrick, who
developed the process at Fort Detrick as part of the U.S. biological
weapons program that ended in 1969. The process is protected by at least
five secret patents held by Patrick. It involved freeze drying and
chemical processing and was achieved without having to grow vast
quantities of spores or mill them to terribly small dimensions, Patrick
and other experts said.

Spores were mass-produced at a Pine Bluff, Ark., facility, Patrick said.
Production stocks were destroyed, but he said he did not know whether
"seed stocks" from which new batches could be grown had also been
destroyed. Under the terms of an international treaty banning biological
weapons, to which the United States is a signatory, small amounts of
biological weapons can be produced to conduct defensive research.

The Russian program, which has been described in detail by Ken Alibek,
who ran it for many years before moving to the United States to do
biological research, required the production of much larger quantities
of spores that were more heavily milled than the U.S. spores and used a
different kind of freezing and coating process.

The Iraqi technique, uncovered by U.N. inspectors, was a novel one-step
process that involved drying spores in the presence of aluminum-based
clays or silica powders, said Richard Spertzel, who was part of the U.N.
Special Commission (UNSCOM) team that was to uncover and destroy Iraq's
weapons of mass destruction program after the Gulf War. UNSCOM was
ultimately frustrated in its attempt to account for all of Iraq's
biological weapons.

"If [U.S. investigators] can get a clue as to how the material in the
Daschle letter was prepared, that might narrow the field," Spertzel
said. "It may not pinpoint it, but it may narrow it."

White House officials and some lawmakers have said they suspect a
connection between the anthrax letters and the al Qaeda terrorist
organization, whose leader, Osama bin Laden, has been blamed for the
Sept. 11 terror attacks on New York and Washington.

President Bush suggested again yesterday that it is his working
assumption that al Qaeda is involved. "I have no direct evidence, but
there are some links" between Sept. 11 and the anthrax mailings, Bush
said in a speech in Anne Arundel County. "Both series of actions are
motivated by evil and hate. Both series of actions are meant to disrupt
Americans' way of life. Both series of actions are an attack on our
homeland. And both series of actions will not stand."

FBI investigators say they have no evidence connecting the anthrax cases
with the bin Laden network, although they are operating under the
presumption that there could be a link. The three letters recovered
include references to Allah and vows of death to Israel and the United
States, but many investigators suspect the language is purposeful misdirection.

Some within the administration and on Capitol Hill have also pointed a
finger at Iraq, and some officials have expressed a desire to punish
Iraq if it were found to have been involved.

Also yesterday, FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III said authorities
continue to receive a high number of terrorist threats after the Sept.
11 assaults, and he warned that more attacks are a "distinct possibility."

"I must tell you that the threat level remains very high," Mueller said
at a meeting of the U.S. Conference of Mayors in Washington. "More
attempts and possible attacks are a distinct possibility. This
possibility requires all of us to continue walking the fine line of
staying alert on the one hand without causing undo alarm on the other hand."

Staff writers Eric Pianin and Mike Allen contributed to this report.

© 2001 The Washington Post Company

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Pinpoint the right security solution for your company- Learn how to add 128- bit encryption and to authenticate your web site with VeriSign's FREE guide!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yQix2C/33_CAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 20:59:57 PST