[iwar] NewScientist - Anthrax of US origin

From: yangyun@metacrawler.com
Date: 2001-10-31 00:04:28


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-3682-1004515471-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 31 Oct 2001 00:07:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 13340 invoked by uid 510); 31 Oct 2001 08:03:47 -0000
Received: from n32.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.82) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 31 Oct 2001 08:03:47 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-3682-1004515471-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.1.221] by n32.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Oct 2001 08:04:31 -0000
X-Sender: yangyun@metacrawler.com
X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 31 Oct 2001 08:04:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 33187 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2001 08:04:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by 10.1.1.221 with QMQP; 31 Oct 2001 08:04:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n1.groups.yahoo.com) (216.115.96.51) by mta3 with SMTP; 31 Oct 2001 08:04:31 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: yangyun@metacrawler.com
Received: from [10.1.10.66] by n1.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Oct 2001 08:04:31 -0000
To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Message-ID: <9robac+br8q@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 24.101.117.200
From: yangyun@metacrawler.com
X-Yahoo-Profile: televr
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 08:04:28 -0000
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iwar] NewScientist - Anthrax of US origin
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

 
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99991490

Anthrax preparation indicates home-grown origin
 
16:04   29  October  01
Debora MacKenzie
 

As anthrax continues to turn up in US postal facilities, and postal
workers, evidence is emerging that it is an American product. Not only
are the bacteria genetically close to the strain the US used in its
own anthrax weapons in the 1960s, but New Scientist can reveal that
the spores also seem to have been prepared according to the secret US
"weaponisation" recipe.

This is troubling, say bioterrorism specialists. While the terrorists
behind the anthrax-laced mail US might have got hold of the strain of
anthrax in several laboratories around the world, the method the US
developed for turning a wet bacterial culture into a dangerous, dry
powder is a closely-guarded secret.

Its apparent use in the current spate of attacks could mean the secret
is out. An alternative is that someone is using anthrax produced by
the old US biological weapons programme that ended in 1969 - in which
case the scope for further attacks could be limited. Experiments to
determine which is true are underway now in the US.


Particle size

Analysis of the physical form of the anthrax powder used in the
attacks has lagged behind the genetic analysis. Bacteria from patients
or contaminated surfaces can be multiplied up to provide enough DNA
for analysis. But a physical examination requires a sample of the
actual powder, and so far, only two are known. One is from the letter
opened in Senator Tom Daschle's office in Washington on 15 October,
the other from a letter sent to the New York Post.

Last week, US Senator Bill Frist announced that the powder in the
Daschle letter was in particles 1.5 to 3.0 microns wide, a very narrow
size range. The results of the physical analysis of the New York Post
letter are not yet known.

The actual bacterial spore is ovoid and around half a micron wide. The
whole trick to making anthrax weapons, says Ken Alibek, the former
deputy head of the Soviet Union's bioweapons programme, is to turn wet
cultures of bacteria into dry clumps of spores that are each between
one and five microns wide, the optimal size to penetrate a human lung
and stay there.

But dried spores tend to form larger particles, with a static electric
charge that makes them cling doggedly to surfaces rather than floating
through the air where they can be inhaled.


Fluidising agent

The Soviet Union got around this by grinding dried cultures along with
chemicals that cause the particles to remain separate. Iraq is the
only other state known to have tried making such a weapon, and it
dried anthrax cultures along with bentonite, a clay used as a
fluidising agent in powders. But last week the White House said there
was no bentonite in the Daschle letter.

For its weapon, say informed sources, the US added various molecules,
including surfactants, to the wet spores so that when they were dried,
they broke up into fine particles within a very narrow size range of a
few microns. There was no need to grind the powder further. Chemical
tests are now being conducted to see if any traces of the US additives
are present.

Grinding was considered the most likely way for terrorists to create
anthrax powders, as the milling machinery is not hard to obtain. But
it results in a wider range of particle sizes. Large particles can be
filtered out, but smaller ones remain. The Daschle anthrax, say
sources, looks instead like it was made according to the US recipe.


Anthrax stockpile

The question is, when? At its peak, the US bioweapons programme made
900 kilograms of dry anthrax powder per year at a plant in Arkansas.
That stockpile was destroyed when the US renounced bioweapons in 1969.
But small samples might have been saved without being noticed.

Experiments are now underway in the US to determine how many bacterial
generations separate the anthrax being used in the attacks from the
most closely related strains in a reference collection of anthrax,
which includes the US weapons strain.

If the number is very small, and the anthrax closely resembles the
weapons strain genetically, it could be a leftover from weapons
production before 1969.

If, however, the bacteria have gone through many cell divisions since
the most closely related strain was frozen, they might have been
produced more recently. That would mean someone has obtained not only
a virulent strain of anthrax, but the know-how to turn it into what
was probably the most sophisticated anthrax weapon ever produced.
 
16:04   29  October  01
 



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Pinpoint the right security solution for your company- Learn how to add 128- bit encryption and to authenticate your web site with VeriSign's FREE guide!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yQix2C/33_CAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 20:59:58 PST