Return-Path: <sentto-279987-3742-1004622632-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 01 Nov 2001 05:52:07 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 11579 invoked by uid 510); 1 Nov 2001 13:49:46 -0000 Received: from n11.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.61) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 1 Nov 2001 13:49:46 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-3742-1004622632-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [10.1.1.222] by n11.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Nov 2001 13:50:32 -0000 X-Sender: fc@red.all.net X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 1 Nov 2001 13:50:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 78032 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2001 13:50:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by 10.1.1.222 with QMQP; 1 Nov 2001 13:50:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO red.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta3 with SMTP; 1 Nov 2001 13:50:32 -0000 Received: (from fc@localhost) by red.all.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id fA1Doj927145 for iwar@onelist.com; Thu, 1 Nov 2001 05:50:45 -0800 Message-Id: <200111011350.fA1Doj927145@red.all.net> To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List) Organization: I'm not allowed to say X-Mailer: don't even ask X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net> X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 05:50:45 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Subject: [iwar] [fc:Cyber-Security.Bill.Planned.By.House.Committee] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cyber-Security Bill Planned By House Committee By Robert MacMillan, Newsbytes, 11/1/2001 <a href="http://www.newsbytes.com/news/01/171722.html">http://www.newsbytes.com/news/01/171722.html> House Science Committee Sherwood Boehlert, R-N.Y., today said that the committee is planning legislation designed to address what he said are shortcomings in the nation's critical infrastructure that open it to cyber-attacks. Boehlert, speaking in a Web chat today featuring high-tech CEOs and the Bush administration's director of critical infrastructure protection, Paul Kurtz of the National Security Council, said that the U.S. "has a woefully inadequate investment in computer security." Citing a report from a commission headed by Virginia Gov. James Gilmore, R, Boehlert also said that there are few "top researchers" in the computer security field, there are no agencies directly focusing on computer security and that there is little market incentive for private industry to invest in computer security. "Our committee has a special responsibility to focus on the long term - to ensure that the vulnerabilities we have today do not exist tomorrow," Boehlert said. He added that "What the recent anthrax attacks and the attacks of Sept. 11 have in common is that they turn our own basic systems of daily connections against us - in those cases, our postal system and our transportation system. "Turning our computer systems against us would seem to be a logical extension of that mode of operation." Gilmore's report recommended that the government create an interagency entity to be responsible for coordinating federal cyber-security efforts (something that President Bush did through an executive order this month) as well as an independent "advisory body" to evaluate cyber-defense programs and proposals. Gilmore also recommended that the Y2K offices created by individual government agencies to address the once-feared millennium computer bug be kept online and morphed into agency-specific cyber-security offices. Finally, Gilmore recommended the creation of a cyber-court to address the threat posed by electronic attackers and the creation of a not-for-profit body that can represent the needs of public and private stakeholders in the security arena. While little in this report has surprised anyone on or off Capitol Hill, the focus on these issues has increased sharply in the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks in New York, Pennsylvania and Virginia, along with a wave of cracking attacks, worms and viruses that have buffeted Internet users during the past year. One of the other proposals that has surfaced recently comes from Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., who in late September proposed a National Emergency Technology - or NET - Guard. The NET Guard would function, Wyden said, as a National Guard-style technology defense force comprising the nation's technology workers, should a national technology crisis break out. The so-called NET Guard would use computer equipment, satellite dishes, wireless communications devices and other methods to "quickly recreate and repair compromised communications and technology infrastructures." "With congressional support, the leaders of our nation's technology companies could organize themselves, their employees, and their resources for this purpose," Wyden said. "Medium- and small-sized businesses would be able to contribute once a national framework was put in place." Wyden added that federal funding "need not be extensive." ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Pogo Stick - Just $24.95! Great gift idea for kids of all ages, from Youcansave.com http://us.click.yahoo.com/t5NeUC/QkNDAA/ySSFAA/kgFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 20:59:58 PST