Return-Path: <sentto-279987-3925-1006751558-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 25 Nov 2001 21:15:07 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 19470 invoked by uid 510); 26 Nov 2001 05:13:04 -0000 Received: from n6.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.56) by all.net with SMTP; 26 Nov 2001 05:13:04 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-3925-1006751558-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [10.1.1.224] by n6.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Nov 2001 05:12:39 -0000 X-Sender: fc@red.all.net X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 26 Nov 2001 05:12:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 1715 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2001 05:12:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171) by m6.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 26 Nov 2001 05:12:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO red.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Nov 2001 05:12:37 -0000 Received: (from fc@localhost) by red.all.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id fAQ5EFC32547 for iwar@onelist.com; Sun, 25 Nov 2001 21:14:15 -0800 Message-Id: <200111260514.fAQ5EFC32547@red.all.net> To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List) Organization: I'm not allowed to say X-Mailer: don't even ask X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net> X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 21:14:14 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Subject: [iwar] [fc:EA-6B.Crews.Recast.Their.Infowar.Role] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Aviation Week & Space Technology November 19, 2001 EA-6B Crews Recast Their Infowar Role By Robert Wall, USS Carl Vinson, Arabian Sea U.S. Navy EA-6B Prowler crews supporting the air campaign against Afghanistan have established an enhanced communications jamming role for themselves to become part of an integrated information warfare system and to support special operations units. In a new twist, EA-6B crews are using their ALQ-99 jamming system, typically employed to disrupt enemy air defense radars, to jam enemy communications. Prowler crews are exploiting the technique on both aircraft carriers supporting the war effort--the USS Carl Vinson and USS Theodore Roosevelt. In the past, communications jamming relied on the USQ-113, a dedicated subsystem, but the adaptation of the ALQ-99 is a recent development, said Lt. Jeff Smith, an EA-6B pilot. The ALQ-99 expands what communications frequencies can be disrupted. The result is that EA-6Bs can now effectively shut down any Taliban communications traffic. Moreover, the ALQ-99 can deliver more jamming energy than the USQ-113. The new tool has proven particularly useful in supporting the Pentagon's "hidden" special operations forces campaign. When those forces have been inserted behind Taliban lines or merely brought forward to support targeting on the ground, Prowlers have been suppressing Taliban communications to deny them the ability to alert forces in the rear. THE COMMUNICATIONS jamming capability has been employed extensively ever since the Afghan air defenses were effectively eliminated during the first week of combat operations. The expanded mission comes at a time when EA-6B crews thought they might find themselves sidelined because Afghan air defenses, particularly the small number of SA-3s, were destroyed quickly. "There is nothing for us to do, we thought," Smith said. The absence of traditional targets caused electronic warfare planners to "look across the entire radio-frequency spectrum" to find other potential points to attack, said Lt. J.D. McCreary, the tactics officer for VAQ-135. The concept was developed by EA-6B tacticians and hardware experts. That online information-sharing capability itself is a rather new development, springing out of lessons from past conflicts. The effort is "establishing the EA-6B in the information warfare process," he added. But the new mission is taking the EA-6Bs away from support of the carrier air wing. Instead, operators are establishing a teaming arrangement involving Air Force EC-130H Compass Call communications jammers, EC-130E Commando Solo broadcasters, RC-135 Rivet Joint signals intelligence aircraft and Navy EP-3E sigint collectors. The goal is "to shape the information operations battlefield," Smith said. COMPASS CALL and EA-6Bs divide who will jam what frequencies. Moreover, the jamming platforms deconflict with Rivet Joint and EP-3 to ensure frequencies the sigint collectors are monitoring are not disturbed. Detailed mission plans are developed daily to assign responsibility for the different frequencies. However, tactical adjustments also are made, such as Compass Call asking Prowler to take over jamming a frequency, or Rivet Joint telling the jammers to cease emitting so they can monitor a particular frequency. The electronic combat coordination process itself is still maturing. The coordination also involves intricate post-mission analysis, such as what frequency changes the Taliban make once their links are interrupted. Part of the goal is to establish whether there are any patterns in how the Taliban react. MOREOVER, THE JAMMING aircraft have to deconflict with other elements of strike packages to avoid interfering with friendly forces. Particularly vulnerable are the GPS-link of the Joint Direct Attack Munition and Joint Standoff Weapon. But crews also worry they will disrupt links for the Predator unmanned aircraft operating over Afghanistan. The communications jamming role is requiring EA-6Bs to change their flying pattern. Enemy surveillance radars generally are directed toward the Prowler to track them or the strike package it is escorting. That makes the radars easier to target. Communications links are usually highly directional, so the EA-6Bs have to take greater care to position themselves in order to effectively project jamming energy to disrupt the signals. EA-6B officials insist this isn't putting the crews at greater risk. In fact, missions are planned to avoid flying too close to mountains from which Taliban forces could fire shoulder-fired infrared-guided missiles. Another sign that the air-defense suppression role has faded in this conflict is that the Prowlers aren't carrying any Harm antiradar missiles. In fact, air defenses were targeted so heavily during the first few days of conflict that, even then, no Harms were carried. Moreover, a policy that has been in effect for several years demanding that all strike aircraft have EA-6B support jamming protection has been temporarily lifted because of the lack of Taliban air defenses. GENERALLY, THE TWO carrier-based EA-6B squadrons divide a day's operations. Three aircraft of each squadron participate in daily sorties, with the fourth aircraft used to conduct training that is still required. The attack missions are staggered so one EA-6B is in the combat area while another is being refueled in the air. The other aircraft either have returned or are being prepared for their daily mission. Each mission lasts 6-7 hr., which is unusually long for the EA-6B. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Universal Inkjet Refill Kit $29.95 Refill any ink cartridge for less! Includes black and color ink. http://us.click.yahoo.com/bAmslD/MkNDAA/ySSFAA/kgFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 20:59:59 PST