Re: [iwar] John Ashcroft is no Founding Father

From: e.r. (fastflyer28@yahoo.com)
Date: 2001-12-02 20:35:12


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-3990-1007354114-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 02 Dec 2001 20:38:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 20662 invoked by uid 510); 3 Dec 2001 04:35:39 -0000
Received: from n31.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.81) by all.net with SMTP; 3 Dec 2001 04:35:39 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-3990-1007354114-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com
Received: from [10.1.4.55] by n31.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Dec 2001 04:35:14 -0000
X-Sender: fastflyer28@yahoo.com
X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 3 Dec 2001 04:35:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 42787 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2001 04:35:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172) by m11.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Dec 2001 04:35:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO web14501.mail.yahoo.com) (216.136.224.64) by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Dec 2001 04:35:13 -0000
Message-ID: <20011203043512.37884.qmail@web14501.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [12.78.120.63] by web14501.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 02 Dec 2001 20:35:12 PST
To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
In-Reply-To: <9uer4d+pgs0@eGroups.com>
From: "e.r." <fastflyer28@yahoo.com>
X-Yahoo-Profile: fastflyer28
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 20:35:12 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [iwar] John Ashcroft is no Founding Father
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Tony Lewis is right on the money. As an American Citizen since birth it
would be no suprise to me if John Ashcroft would trample on my
constitutional rights.  Why did he loose his last race for Senate to a
dead man.  Because even the sensable people of Mississori began to fear
his radical right wing politics.  More frightening, Pres. Bush, after
the loose, gave him greater powers to damage our Constitutional rights.
He was "W"'s bottom of the barrle cabinet choice.
--- yangyun@metacrawler.com wrote:
> It Can Happen Here
> By ANTHONY LEWIS
> 
> BOSTON
> 
> On the basis of secret evidence, the government accuses a non-citizen
> of connections to terrorism, and holds him in prison for three years.
> Then a judge conducts a full trial and rejects the terrorism charges.
> He releases the prisoner. A year later government agents rearrest the
> man, hold him in solitary confinement and state as facts the
> terrorism
> charges that the judge found untrue.
> 
> Could that happen in America? In John Ashcroft's America it has
> happened.
> 
> Mazen Al-Najjar, a Palestinian, came to the United States in 1984 as
> a
> graduate student and stayed to teach at a university. The Immigration
> Service moved to deport him for overstaying his visa — and asked an
> immigration judge, R. Kevin McHugh, to imprison him. Secret evidence,
> the government lawyers said, showed that Mr. Al-Najjar had raised
> funds for a terrorist organization, Palestinian Islamic Jihad. In
> June
> 1997 Judge McHugh issued the detention order.
> 
> Mr. Al-Najjar's lawyers went to federal court and challenged the use
> of secret evidence against him. The court held that he must at least
> be told enough about the evidence to have a fair chance of responding
> to it.
> 
> Judge McHugh then reopened the case in his immigration court. In a
> two-week trial the government's lead witness, an Immigration agent,
> admitted that there was no evidence of Mr. Al-Najjar contributing to
> a
> terrorist organization or ever advocating terrorism. At the end Judge
> McHugh found that there were no "bona fide reasons to conclude that
> [Mr. Al- Najjar] is a threat to national security."
> 
> Judge McHugh, a former U.S. marine, wrote a 56-page decision that
> evidently carried much legal weight. The Board of Immigration Appeals
> rejected a government appeal. And Attorney General Janet Reno, who
> had
> the right to step in, refused to do so. A year ago Mr. Al-Najjar
> rejoined his wife and three daughters.
> 
> Last Saturday immigration agents arrested Mr. Al-Najjar again. The
> Justice Department issued a triumphant press release saying that the
> case "underscores the department's commitment to address terrorism by
> using all legal authorities available." Mr. Al-Najjar, it said, "had
> established ties to terrorist organizations."
> 
> That flat, conclusory statement was in direct contradiction to the
> findings made by Judge McHugh after a full trial. And the department
> did not claim, this time, to be relying on undisclosed information.
> It
> said the detention was "not based on classified evidence."
> 
> It seems to me shocking that the United States Department of Justice
> should state as a fact something that a judge has found to be untrue.
> The whole press release had the ring not of law but of political
> propaganda. That is not the department of respected lawyers that I
> have known over many years.
> 
> Mr. Al-Najjar is not only back in prison, he is being treated with
> exceptional severity, indeed cruelty. He is in solitary confinement
> 23
> hours a day. He is not allowed to make telephone calls, and he may
> not
> see his family. Only his lawyer is permitted to visit him.
> 
> Because Mr. Al-Najjar is stateless and no country will accept him, he
> probably cannot be deported. So if the Justice Department view that
> he
> is a security risk prevails — in the teeth of the judge's finding —
> he
> could spend the rest of his life in prison.
> 
> Why is Attorney General Ashcroft using his office to punish this man
> so severely? At a time of national anxiety about Arabs and Muslims,
> Mr. Al-Najjar is a useful target: a Palestinian Muslim. More broadly,
> Mr. Ashcroft has claimed power to detain non-citizens even when
> immigration judges order them released.
> 
> It could be, too, that Mr. Ashcroft wants to use this case to
> establish the right to use secret evidence against aliens. The
> practice had been all but abandoned by the Justice Department after
> several judges frowned on it and more than 100 members of the House
> co-sponsored legislation to prohibit it.
> 
> With all the extreme measures taken by the administration in recent
> days — detaining hundreds of people, ordering thousands questioned,
> establishing military tribunals — Mr. Ashcroft and President Bush
> have
> assured the country that they will enforce the measures with care,
> and
> with concern for civil liberties. Their motto is, "Trust us."
> 
> The Al-Najjar case shows that there is no basis for trust.
> 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Buy the perfect holiday gifts at Yahoo! Shopping.
http://shopping.yahoo.com

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
See What You've Been Missing!
Amazing Wireless Video Camera.
Click here
http://us.click.yahoo.com/75YKVC/7.PDAA/ySSFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 21:00:00 PST