Re: [iwar] New worm spreading, @home coming back, etc.

From: Brian S. McWilliams (B_McWilliams@Newsbytes.com)
Date: 2001-12-05 05:43:15


Return-Path: <B_McWilliams@Newsbytes.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 05 Dec 2001 05:44:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 15015 invoked by uid 510); 5 Dec 2001 13:43:14 -0000
Received: from chmls20.mediaone.net (24.147.1.156) by all.net with SMTP; 5 Dec 2001 13:43:14 -0000
Received: from bmcwxpst500.Newsbytes.com (unknown1.ne.mediaone.net [66.30.97.150]) by chmls20.mediaone.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id fB5Dibx09154 for <fc@all.net>; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 08:44:37 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011205084051.03ea8300@mail-dnh.mv.net>
X-Sender: bmcw@pop.ne.mediaone.net (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 08:43:15 -0500
To: fc@all.net
From: "Brian S. McWilliams" <B_McWilliams@Newsbytes.com>
Subject: Re: [iwar] New worm spreading, @home coming back, etc.
In-Reply-To: <200112041932.fB4JW4N26988@red.all.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 02:32 PM 12/4/2001, you wrote:
4) As the @home network came back up, it revealed many many UIDs and
>passwords because the modems were not brought up in a restricted enough
>operating mode.  For those who recorded the traffic, it is a goldmine.

Hi Fred,

Got a sec to unravel this thought a little further?

Thanks,

Brian



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 21:00:00 PST