[iwar] [fc:Judge.orders.Interior.to.cut.Internet.access]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2001-12-07 22:48:22


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-4032-1007794088-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 07 Dec 2001 22:49:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 22005 invoked by uid 510); 8 Dec 2001 06:48:31 -0000
Received: from n24.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.74) by all.net with SMTP; 8 Dec 2001 06:48:31 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-4032-1007794088-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com
Received: from [216.115.97.191] by n24.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Dec 2001 06:48:08 -0000
X-Sender: fc@red.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_2); 8 Dec 2001 06:48:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 64783 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2001 06:48:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172) by m5.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Dec 2001 06:48:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO red.all.net) (12.232.125.69) by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Dec 2001 06:48:07 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by red.all.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id fB86mMO16795 for iwar@onelist.com; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 22:48:22 -0800
Message-Id: <200112080648.fB86mMO16795@red.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 22:48:22 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [iwar] [fc:Judge.orders.Interior.to.cut.Internet.access]
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Judge orders Interior to cut Internet access

Indianz.com

December 5, 2001

A federal judge on Wednesday evening threatened yet again to hold Secretary
of Interior Gale Norton in contempt as he ordered her department to
"immediately" disconnect from the Internet every single computer, server and
system that has access to individual Indian trust data.

In a sweeping action with far-reaching but unclear ramifications, U.S.
District Judge Royce Lamberth granted the emergency request, which was
brought on behalf of 300,000 American Indians whose assets are housed on a
computer infrastructure so easily penetrable that a court investigator and
his team of security experts were able to break in and repeatedly access,
modify and even create trust data -- all without raising a response from the
government. 

Agreeing with attorneys representing Indian beneficiaries who argued that
the entire system must be shut down or risk "irreparable harm," Lamberth
made his move after a long and grueling day of haggling between his court
and the Interior. He convened a public hearing in the morning but stopped
the proceedings when one of Norton's attorneys made a startling
announcement. "Today, Interior has directed its major systems that deal with
the trust related data to disconnect from the Internet," said Matt Fader, a
Department of Justice attorney.

The revelation at first convinced Lamberth he shouldn't take action. Based
on the directive, which was claimed to have been issued by Associate Deputy
Secretary James Cason sometime after 8 a.m. but before 10 a.m., he told the
Interior to come back on Friday with a status update. That would have given
the Interior more time to evaluate how pulling the plug would affect its
trust responsibilities, something it was in the "preliminary stages" of
doing, noted Fader. According to Interior officials, "[i]ndications are that
it might not create a substantial disruption," he said.

But further conversations with Norton's defense team clearly wore Lamberth's
patience thin. Signs showed when Fader denied a scathing investigation
detailing numerous security breaches -- unsealed on Tuesday -- presented
"evidence" of any "manipulation or deletion" of trust fund data. "You don't
expect a thief to leave a calling card, do you?" Lamberth asked Fader. "I
don't understand your argument."

The grilling continued when Fader was summoned to court to explain whether
the Interior intended to cut Internet service not just to the computer
systems that house trust data -- such as the $40 million Trust Asset
Accounting and Management System (TAAMS) verging on collapse -- but to
personal computers used by Interior employees and outside contractors who
have access to sensitive information such as land ownership and lease
payments. 

Fader responded that he didn't know what was meant by such basic terms as
"individual trust data" and "computer," to which Lamberth shot back: "I
don't believe a word you're saying now." "You're just ruining your
credibility talking to me that way." Attorneys for the account holders were
extremely pleased by Lamberth's decision. In the morning, Dennis Gingold
said the Interior's voluntary shutdown was a "positive" step but, like
Lamberth, he grew tired of what he called the government's "broken
promises." 

"Our clients cannot afford any more of the incompetence of the Department of
the Interior," Gingold said. "We can't afford it." Keith Harper of the
Native American Rights Fund said he hoped the fiasco would provide further
evidence of Norton's negligence when a contempt trial begins on Monday. By
not reporting the numerous security problems, he said the Interior has
breached its obligations to Indian beneficiaries once again. The Interior
did not return repeated calls requesting comment. Norton and Assistant
Secretary Neal McCaleb, also facing contempt charges, were both traveling
outside of Washington, D.C., when the proceedings were taking place.

Coupled with the judge's action were criticisms from members of Congress
about the security failures. "The GAO told us five years ago that the fund
was in shambles," said Rep. Jim Hansen (R-Utah,) chairman of the House
Resources Committee, which has jurisdiction over Indian affairs. "Now we
learn that a computer security system deployed in 1999 is virtually
worthless," he said.

Rep. Nick Rahall (D-W.Va.), the committee's ranking member added: "Special
Master Alan Balaran's thorough report detailing the trust fund computer
security breaches just further demonstrates why any changes to trust fund
management must be done deliberately and openly with tribal consultation
throughout the process."

Hansen's committee has scheduled an oversight hearing into the debacle on
February 6, 2002. Government witnesses include McCaleb, Deputy Secretary J.
Steven Griles, Special Trustee Thomas Slonaker and Ross Swimmer, the
recently appointed director of the Office of Indian Trust Transition. Tribal
leaders will also be invited.

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Stop Smoking Now
Nicotrol will help
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2vN8tD/_pSDAA/ySSFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 21:00:00 PST