[iwar] [fc:Saudis.Assail.'Media.Blitz'.Against.Them.In.The.West]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2001-12-23 06:29:24


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-4118-1009117754-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 23 Dec 2001 06:30:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 31999 invoked by uid 510); 23 Dec 2001 14:29:34 -0000
Received: from n1.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.51) by all.net with SMTP; 23 Dec 2001 14:29:34 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-4118-1009117754-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com
Received: from [216.115.97.162] by n1.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Dec 2001 14:29:14 -0000
X-Sender: fc@red.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 23 Dec 2001 14:29:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 10254 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2001 14:29:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171) by m8.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 23 Dec 2001 14:29:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO red.all.net) (12.232.125.69) by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Dec 2001 14:29:13 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by red.all.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id fBNETOI20616 for iwar@onelist.com; Sun, 23 Dec 2001 06:29:24 -0800
Message-Id: <200112231429.fBNETOI20616@red.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 06:29:24 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [iwar] [fc:Saudis.Assail.'Media.Blitz'.Against.Them.In.The.West]
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

New York Times
December 21, 2001
Saudis Assail 'Media Blitz' Against Them In The West
By Douglas Jehl
RIYADH, Saudi Arabia, Dec. 20 - Venting new frustration at how Saudi Arabia
is being portrayed in the West, two of the kingdom's top officials have
publicly assailed what they called unfair and biased news coverage, with the
defense minister citing a "slanderous campaign."
In remarks published in Saudi newspapers today, the defense minister, Prince
Sultan, and his son, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, who is ambassador to
Washington, spoke in unusually harsh terms in denouncing articles and
editorials that have suggested that the kingdom has been complicit in
terrorism.
Prince Bandar criticized many of those reports, including the ones that have
portrayed Saudi Arabia as teaching hatred of non-Muslims in its schools and
paying protection money to supporters of Osama bin Laden, a Saudi dissident.
"The truth of the matter is, we think he's evil, bin Laden," Prince Bandar
said in an interview conducted Monday by CNBC. "We think people who follow
him are evil. We have pain for what happened in America We are condemning
what happened. You guys are refusing to accept us."
Prince Sultan was quoted as saying he was surprised by the American media
coverage, saying that Saudi newspapers `did not match evil with evil by
responding to the slanderous campaign in the West," according to the
official government Saudi Press Agency.
Speaking to reporters on Tuesday night in Tabuk, he said Saudi Arabia was
not against the United States or the West and did not support terrorism but
"we have our Arab and Islamic policy which we would not divert from in any
way whatsoever."
The involvement of 15 Saudi hijackers in the Sept. 11 attacks has focused
much critical attention on the kingdom, and senior Saudi officials have
complained repeatedly that many accounts were inaccurate. In a lengthy press
release last week, the Saudi Embassy in Washington tried a rebuttal, noting
for example that President Bush had declared as early as Sept. 24 that "the
Saudi Arabians have been nothing but cooperative."
In trying to smooth over any disagreements, officials from both countries
have found it convenient to blame the press, but in Saudi Arabia that blame
has been particularly pointed at what most Saudis interpret to be a Jewish
lobby that controls the American media. Concerns are usually voiced in
private, but Prince Sultan's comments can be seen as a faithful reflection
of a much broader Saudi sentiment.
"The media blitz against the kingdom is not in the interest of the United
States," Prince Sultan was quoted as saying. "U.S.-Saudi ties are based on
huge mutual interests."
Prince Sultan is the third-ranking official in the Saudi hierarchy, and his
remarks seemed particularly significant because he is generally thought to
be among the Saudi leaders with the closest ties to the United States. He
attributed what he called "the campaign by some American and Western
newspapers" to the kingdom's support for the Palestinians, as voiced in an
unusually sharp message that Crown Prince Abdullah, the kingdom's day-to-day
leader, sent to President Bush in August over American support for Israel.

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Access Your PC from Anywhere - Full setup in 2 minutes - Free Download
http://us.click.yahoo.com/StuHlD/E6eDAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-12-31 21:00:00 PST