[iwar] [fc:Arms.Seizure.Backfires,.Wounds.Israel]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2002-01-08 22:14:57


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-4255-1010556862-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 08 Jan 2002 22:16:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 3958 invoked by uid 510); 9 Jan 2002 06:14:42 -0000
Received: from n31.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.81) by all.net with SMTP; 9 Jan 2002 06:14:42 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-4255-1010556862-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com
Received: from [216.115.97.191] by n31.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jan 2002 06:14:22 -0000
X-Sender: fc@red.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 9 Jan 2002 06:14:21 -0000
Received: (qmail 79647 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2002 06:14:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172) by m5.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 9 Jan 2002 06:14:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO red.all.net) (12.232.125.69) by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Jan 2002 06:14:20 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by red.all.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id g096EvL29808 for iwar@onelist.com; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 22:14:57 -0800
Message-Id: <200201090614.g096EvL29808@red.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 22:14:57 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [iwar] [fc:Arms.Seizure.Backfires,.Wounds.Israel]
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Arms Seizure Backfires, Wounds Israel
2120 GMT, 020108

Summary

Israeli naval commandos seized a vessel loaded with arms in the Red Sea on Jan. 
4. Israel claims the weapons came from Iran and were bound for the Palestinian territories. 
But the circumstances surrounding the shipment and details that emerged after its 
seizure have raised questions about the entire incident and, more importantly, about 
Israel's credibility. Audiences in Europe and the United States now will be more 
likely to question other Israeli claims concerning Palestinians.

Analysis

In a daring nighttime raid on Jan. 4, Israeli commandos seized a vessel in international 
waters of the Red Sea that was carrying 50 tons of weapons, including Katyusha rockets, 
anti-aircraft and anti-tank missiles, sniper rifles and mortar launchers. Israeli 
government officials said the next morning that the Palestinian Authority had purchased 
the weapons from Iran and was intending to smuggle them into the territories.

The circumstances surrounding the shipment and details that emerged after its seizure 
have cast doubts on Israel's report of the incident, however. Both the Palestinian 
Authority and Tehran have denied any connection to the Karine A, and a report in 
a prestigious British shipping journal contradicts Israeli allegations regarding 
the vessel's ownership. Rather than validating Israel's claims of Palestinian duplicity, 
the incident has damaged Israel's credibility. Audiences in the West, especially 
in Europe and the United States, are now more likely to question other Israeli charges 
against the Palestinians.

American and European distrust of Israeli allegations will give the Palestinian 
Authority more room to maneuver in the short term. PA leader Yasser Arafat can continue 
to argue that he wants peace and to cite Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's aggressive 
policies as the root cause of continuing violence in the Middle East. 

Israel had hoped to achieve a double whammy with the ship seizure. First, it sought 
to throw a wrench into peace talks. It aimed to ensure that the United States would 
not push Israel into negotiating a truce at a time when it has the upper hand with 
Arafat. Implicating Iran would advance yet another goal -- containment of the emerging 
Persian Gulf power. Immediately after announcing the capture of the vessel, Israel 
called on the European Union to declare Iran a state sponsor of terrorism. The United 
States already does so.

But the seizure of the Karine A instead has mushroomed into a full-scale embarrassment 
for Israel. Several details undermine claims that the Palestinian Authority was directly 
involved in the purchase and smuggling of weapons. For example, the timing of the 
seizure provided a convenient means of thwarting progress toward peace talks during 
a four-day visit by U.S. envoy Anthony Zinni. 

Despite claims to the contrary, Zinni failed to achieve any real steps toward resuming 
peace talks. In fact, Sharon plans to re-evaluate Israel's relations with the Palestinian 
Authority, Haaretz reported Jan. 7. He has pointed to the vessel seizure to justify 
the move and to validate his labeling of Arafat as a terrorist unwilling to work 
toward peace.

At the same time, logic argues against the idea that the Palestinian Authority was 
involved in the incident: The presence of Palestinian naval officers aboard the vessel, 
including one who later directly fingered two of Arafat's top lieutenants, limits 
plausible deniability. Though the Palestinian Authority does not govern a state, 
it nonetheless must behave as a government -- and governments engaged in covert or 
illegal operations usually act in a manner that allows plausible deniability. It 
would be either extremely stupid or sheerly lunatic for the Palestinians to think 
that a weapons-laden ship might transit the Red Sea and the Suez Canal undetected 
at a time when both are under heightened surveillance. 

Furthermore, there are contradictory reports about the vessel's ownership. Israel 
claims Palestinians owned the ship, but Lloyd's List, a premier shipping publication 
owned by Lloyd's of London, reported Jan.7 that it was owned by an Iraqi national. 
According to Lloyd's, it was a Lebanese-flagged vessel operated by the Beirut-based 
Diana K. Shipping Co. and was sold in August 2001 to Ali Mohammed Abbas for $400,000. 
The ship was then re-registered in Tonga as the Karine A. Although a Lebanese Transport 
Ministry official has disputed the Lloyd's report, it lends credence to the Palestinian 
denials and countercharges that Israel manipulated the seizure to derail peace talks.

Ultimately, it matters little whether the Israeli assertions are true. The many 
apparent discrepancies, the illogic of the idea that the Palestinian Authority would 
attempt such an operation and finally the Lloyd's List report have combined to cast 
doubt on the Israeli claims. Even the United States has failed to endorse Israel's 
version of events, The Jerusalem Post reported Jan. 8. 

As far as Israel is concerned, the best thing that can happen now is for the whole 
incident to blow over. Politicians and military leaders are all pointing fingers 
at each other, blaming everyone but themselves for what is seen as a public relations 
debacle. 

The internal debate, however, overlooks the larger issue: Israel's credibility has 
taken a blow, giving the Palestinians leverage in the short term. Now the Palestinian 
Authority can ask Europe and the United States to pressure Sharon to come to the 
negotiating table. More important, few will take future Israeli claims about Palestinian 
arms-smuggling at face value. 

Israel's burden of proof just got a lot heavier. 

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Tiny Wireless Camera under $80!
Order Now! FREE VCR Commander!
Click Here - Only 1 Day Left!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/WoOlbB/7.PDAA/ySSFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2002-12-31 02:15:02 PST