Return-Path: <sentto-279987-4523-1014647296-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 25 Feb 2002 06:30:11 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 12398 invoked by uid 510); 25 Feb 2002 14:28:14 -0000 Received: from n26.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.76) by all.net with SMTP; 25 Feb 2002 14:28:14 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-4523-1014647296-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [216.115.97.189] by n26.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Feb 2002 14:12:04 -0000 X-Sender: fc@red.all.net X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com Received: (EGP: unknown); 25 Feb 2002 14:28:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 23298 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2002 14:28:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167) by m3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Feb 2002 14:28:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO red.all.net) (12.232.72.152) by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Feb 2002 14:28:15 -0000 Received: (from fc@localhost) by red.all.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id g1PESJ002975 for iwar@onelist.com; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 06:28:19 -0800 Message-Id: <200202251428.g1PESJ002975@red.all.net> To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List) Organization: I'm not allowed to say X-Mailer: don't even ask X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net> X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 06:28:18 -0800 (PST) Subject: [iwar] [fc:Office.of.Strategic.Influence.wanted.to.plant.fake.stories] Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Coyote Rummy February 24, 2002 By MAUREEN DOWD <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/24/opinion/24DOWD.html?ex=1015598622&ei=1">http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/24/opinion/24DOWD.html?ex=1015598622&ei=1>& en=97faf21f36c586a1 WASHINGTON - The secretary of defense fires off lots of memos, known as "snowflakes" or "Rummygrams." I want Rummy to send a Rummygram telling the Pentagon to kick its addiction to fiction. A day after we learned that the military's Office of Strategic Influence wanted to plant fake stories in the overseas press, we read in Variety that the Pentagon is teaming with Jerry Bruckheimer, producer of "Top Gun," "Black Hawk Down," "Pearl Harbor" and "Coyote Ugly," and Bertram van Munster, of "Cops," to make a TV docudrama about the war on terrorism. The 13-episode "reality" series on ABC will profile our troops abroad. The Los Angeles Times reported that the Pentagon would also cooperate with a VH1 show called the "Military Diaries Project," which will turn 60 soldiers into Josh Hartnetts as they star in their own war movies, training digital cameras on themselves. "I'm outraged about the Hollywoodization of the military," Dan Rather told me. "Somebody's got to question whether it's a good idea to limit independent reporting on the battlefield and access of journalists to U.S. military personnel and then conspire with Hollywood." He said the Bush administration had gotten overly fawning "Hans Christian Andersen" press coverage and was now doing "the equivalent of moonwalking in the end zone." An ABC News executive said it was "ridiculous" and "very awkward," since the news side had been pounding the Pentagon for months for "bare-bones access" to the war, to see Pentagon officials roll out the camouflage carpet now for ABC's entertainment division. An ABC Entertainment executive said the Pentagon was eager to "produce what Americans want to see" because they regard it as "an Army recruiting film." Military reporters say they are more handcuffed now than during Desert Storm. They have had only the most restricted and supervised access to Special Operations units. Even reporters who went to Afghanistan with the Marines found themselves quarantined in warehouses and handed press releases from Central Command in Tampa about casualties less than 100 yards away. Some who got close to the action had film confiscated and guns pointed at them by Special Operations soldiers or their mujahedeen bullies. The Pentagon said one reason it couldn't give more access was because it was too dangerous. But reporters like Danny Pearl are more than willing to assume that risk. More journalists have been killed in Afghanistan than American soldiers have in hostile fire. When Don Rumsfeld finally conceded that Special Forces had killed the wrong guys, 16 pro-Karzai Afghan villagers, thinking they were in Al Qaeda, he wouldn't admit an error. Rummy does not make mistakes. And when the war on terror becomes a Bruckheimer production, you won't be seeing any mistakes either. "We're not going to criticize," Mr. van Munster told Variety. Bruckheimer is the new Patton, and his macho, obvious, hyperpatriotic blockbusters suit the Bushies - and Karl Rove and the Republican National Committee - perfectly. The Navy even gave Mr. Bruckheimer an aircraft carrier to have the premiere party for "Pearl Harbor" in Hawaii last spring. The White House and the Pentagon want to write the narrative of the war on terror, and they are willing to use their own soldiers as cameramen and actors in comic book versions of a messy, dirty war. They would rather make troops available as props in gung-ho videos than available to explain how the commanders let Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda leaders escape or targeted the wrong villages. Mr. Bruckheimer said his program would not usurp reporters' access. "Reporters are after breaking news," he said. "We're doing profiles." He said the Pentagon would check the show before it aired, as it did with "Black Hawk Down": "It's not censorship, but we do have a conversation." Posters of Bruckheimer war epics hang near the Pentagon's public affairs office. Down the hall is a painting of Ernie Pyle bent over a typewriter, a relic from the days reporters were allowed to cover wars. The only question is: Will reporters be permitted on the set of Bruckheimer's war, or will that war, too, be closed to the press? <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/24/opinion/24DOWD.html?ex=1015598622&ei=1">http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/24/opinion/24DOWD.html?ex=1015598622&ei=1>& en=97faf21f36c586a1 <a href="http://www.nytimes.com">http://www.nytimes.com> Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Sponsored by VeriSign - The Value of Trust When building an e-commerce site, you want to start with a secure foundation. Learn how with VeriSign's FREE Guide. http://us.click.yahoo.com/oCuuSA/XdiDAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2002-12-31 02:15:03 PST