Return-Path: <sentto-279987-4702-1022076553-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 22 May 2002 07:12:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 27982 invoked by uid 510); 22 May 2002 14:09:08 -0000 Received: from n36.grp.scd.yahoo.com (66.218.66.104) by all.net with SMTP; 22 May 2002 14:09:08 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-4702-1022076553-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.197] by n36.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 May 2002 14:09:13 -0000 X-Sender: fc@red.all.net X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 22 May 2002 14:09:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 58596 invoked from network); 22 May 2002 12:47:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 May 2002 12:47:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO red.all.net) (12.232.72.152) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 May 2002 12:47:33 -0000 Received: (from fc@localhost) by red.all.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id g4MCnMJ23451 for iwar@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 22 May 2002 05:49:22 -0700 Message-Id: <200205221249.g4MCnMJ23451@red.all.net> To: iwar@yahoogroups.com In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSO.4.44.0205221420500.17909-100000@ausmac.net> from "Grant Bayley" at May 22, 2002 02:30:23 PM Organization: I'm not allowed to say X-Mailer: don't even ask X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net> X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 05:49:22 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [iwar] [fc:NAI.is.now.taking.steps.to.remove.the.remaining.copies.of.PGP.from.Internet] Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Per the message sent by Grant Bayley: > Hi Fred, > Keep in mind that of the couple of crypto/security archives out there, the > radiusnet one is basically the "abortion" of the bunch. It's > disorganised and out of date in so many places as to be dangerous. > Further, it appears the version of PGP that they were carrying on the site > was in fact a commercial version, rather than the non-commercial, > "freeware" version that the PGPi site and it's mirrors carry. > You can confirm this in the Google Cache, here: ... Your point is well taken. I note that, as I understand it, the DMCA only provides civil remedies for this sort of violation. If this is true and NAI no longer sells the commercial product, the loss sustained by them is likely negligible (or zero) and they may have no case. Nonetheless, I appreciate your clarification on this issue for the group. FC --This communication is confidential to the parties it is intended to serve-- Fred Cohen Fred Cohen & Associates.........tel/fax:925-454-0171 fc@all.net The University of New Haven.....http://www.unhca.com/ http://all.net/ Sandia National Laboratories....tel:925-294-2087 ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Save 30% on Web addresses! Get with the times, get a web site. Share information, pictures, your hobby, or start a business. Great names are still available- get yours before someone else does! http://us.click.yahoo.com/XmK3jA/nFGEAA/sXBHAA/kgFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2003-08-24 02:46:32 PDT