Re: [iwar] Some thoughts on the latest so-called scandal

From: Tim Kramer (kramert@mlrnoc.navy.mil)
Date: 2002-05-22 11:46:30


Return-Path: <kramert@mlrnoc.navy.mil>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 22 May 2002 13:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 12951 invoked by uid 510); 22 May 2002 20:28:13 -0000
Received: from mail.mlrnoc.navy.mil (138.139.52.8) by all.net with SMTP; 22 May 2002 20:28:13 -0000
Received: from intmgmtws1.mlrnoc.navy.mil (intmgmtws1.mlrnoc.navy.mil [138.139.52.9]) by mail.mlrnoc.navy.mil (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g4MIjsV30541 for <fc@all.net>; Wed, 22 May 2002 14:47:15 -0400
Subject: Re: [iwar] Some thoughts on the latest so-called scandal
From: Tim Kramer <kramert@mlrnoc.navy.mil>
To: fc@all.net
In-Reply-To: <200205221552.g4MFquw07655@red.all.net>
References: <200205221552.g4MFquw07655@red.all.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5 
Date: 22 May 2002 14:46:30 -0400
Message-Id: <1022093276.3039.126.camel@intmgmtws1.mlrnoc.navy.mil>

Have someone actively read those sites?  [violent shudder]  I 
found the one example by asking Google for "911 nazi scandal".
Then again, if you search hard enough, you'll be able to invoke
Godwin's law on just about any subject/discussion.

What would you call the list?  "Tinfoil Hats" ???

R/ Tim


On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 11:52, Fred Cohen wrote:
> Per the message sent by Tim Kramer:
> 
> > On Fri, 2002-05-17 at 22:34, Fred Cohen wrote:
> > > I find it interesting that in their effort to create controversy, the
> > > media seems to miss the point - seemingly every time.  The latest Bush
> > > scandal is a prime example.  Here's my take:
> 
> > Fred,
> 
> > There's one issue I haven't seen yet.  The report that
> > the media is referring to (according to the media) was 
> > an internal document that was part of a briefing/
> > update that GW requested and was held in Aug.  My
> > question is: how did the media get ahold of this
> > document?  If I remember correctly, Presidential
> > briefings are classified.  (Aren't they?)
> 
> Since I have never given nor gotten one, I don't know.
> 
> > R/ Tim
> 
> > P.S.  Since the conspriacy nuts' web sites (makes for
> > entertaining reading on very slow days) have compared
> > GW's silence to "Josphef Gobbels Nazi Ministry of 
> > Propaganda", I hereby invoke Godwin's Law and declare
> > the whole "Did he know?" issue as moot.
> 
> It might be interesting for you to provide the list with a collection of
> these sites - not that any of us have slow days - but it beats many of
> the movies out these days... 
> 
> FC
> --This communication is confidential to the parties it is intended to serve--
> Fred Cohen		Fred Cohen & Associates.........tel/fax:925-454-0171
> fc@all.net		The University of New Haven.....http://www.unhca.com/
> http://all.net/		Sandia National Laboratories....tel:925-294-2087



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2003-08-24 02:46:32 PDT