[iwar] [fc:FBI.Given.More.Latitude.-.New.Surveillance.Rules.Remove.Evidence.Hurdle]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2002-05-30 07:59:32


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-4730-1022770626-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 30 May 2002 08:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 3279 invoked by uid 510); 30 May 2002 15:03:13 -0000
Received: from n8.grp.scd.yahoo.com (66.218.66.92) by all.net with SMTP; 30 May 2002 15:03:13 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-4730-1022770626-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com
Received: from [66.218.67.200] by n8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 May 2002 14:57:28 -0000
X-Sender: fc@red.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 30 May 2002 14:57:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 85907 invoked from network); 30 May 2002 14:57:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 30 May 2002 14:57:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO red.all.net) (12.232.72.152) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 May 2002 14:57:05 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by red.all.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id g4UExWH13064 for iwar@onelist.com; Thu, 30 May 2002 07:59:32 -0700
Message-Id: <200205301459.g4UExWH13064@red.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 07:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [iwar] [fc:FBI.Given.More.Latitude.-.New.Surveillance.Rules.Remove.Evidence.Hurdle]
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=PORN_10,DIFFERENT_REPLY_TO version=2.20
X-Spam-Level: 

FBI Given More Latitude
New Surveillance Rules Remove Evidence Hurdle

By Susan Schmidt and Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, May 30, 2002; Page A01

New Justice Department guidelines to be unveiled today will give FBI agents
latitude to monitor Internet sites, libraries and religious institutions
without first having to offer evidence of potential criminal activity,
officials said yesterday.

The changes, part of the Justice Department's effort to mount a proactive
war on terror, will mark a significant change for the FBI. While agents have
been permitted in the past to conduct such surveillance if they had specific
information, they have been loath to do so because of confusion about what
was actually permitted, law enforcement officials said.

Justice Department and FBI officials said the guidelines will remove serious
barriers to the prevention of terrorism.

"The concern is when we're confronted with people like [Zacarias] Moussaoui,
or even some of the hijackers, who are known to spend substantial periods of
time in mosques or other similar situations, it is very difficult to find
out what they're up to," said one senior law enforcement official.

Terrorist organizations operating in this country have sometimes used
mosques as recruiting grounds and gathering places. Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman,
the blind Egyptian cleric now imprisoned for his role in the 1993 attack on
the World Trade Center, built a radical following with links to al Qaeda
while preaching at mosques in Brooklyn and Jersey City, for example.

But as word of the new guidelines circulated yesterday, some civil liberties
groups expressed fears of a Big Brother government monitoring its citizens.

"The FBI is now telling the American people, 'You no longer have to do
anything unlawful in order to get that knock on the door,' " said Laura
Murphy, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Washington office.
"You can be doing a prefectly legal activity like worshiping or talking in a
chat room, they can spy on you anyway."

The new guidelines state simply that FBI agents may enter public places and
forums, including publicly accessible Internet sites, to observe, develop
leads and investigate. The guidelines do not specifically mention religious
institutions, but a senior Justice Department official said last night that
the impact of the changes will be dramatic in allowing the FBI to open a
window on extremist activity in mosques.

"These are open places," he said. Now, "just because they are FBI agents,
they don't have to turn a blind eye to activities visible to other people."

Under guidelines that have been in place for several decades, the FBI has
not been permitted to send investigators into religious settings unless the
agents can establish they are following a lead, or conducting an
investigation or preliminary inquiry. As a practical matter, the Justice
Department official said, "agents mistakenly think they have to stop at the
church door."

In a written description of the guideline changes made available yesterday,
Attorney General John D. Ashcroft stated that the department needs to be
able to "proactively draw on available sources of information to identify
terrorist threats and activities." In the past, he said, the FBI has been a
reactive body, and the guidelines "generally barred the FBI from taking the
initiative unless leads as to possible criminal activity or even more
substantial evidence of crimes happened to come to the FBI from external
sources."

The new rules will allow agents to surf the Internet for Web sites that
might give hints to terrorist activity, according to the description. The
new guidelines will allow investigators to seek out and "identify sites and
forums in which bomb-making instructions, preparations for cyberterrorism,
child pornography, and stolen credit card information are openly traded and
disseminated."

Under the existing policy, agents could pursue online searches only when
they could characterize them as checking leads or otherwise furthering an
ongoing investigation.

"Pure surfing or searching for the purpose of initially developing leads was
not allowed, even in relation to publicly available information that anyone
else is free to access and observe," according to the new policy statement.

Agents will also be permitted to do topical research not directly related to
a specific crime under the new guidelines, such as research on a biological
agent.

The ACLU's Murphy said, however, that the new guidelines could open the door
to the same kind of problems evident in the FBI's aggressive surveillance
and harassment of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.

Several other aspects of the new guidelines, disclosed earlier this week,
will move some decision-making authority from FBI headquarters to field
offices around the country. FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III acknowledged
yesterday that changes must be made to counter bureaucratic inertia at
headquarters that led to missed clues in the Sept. 11 attacks.

Under the new guidelines, field office directors will be allowed to launch
terrorism investigations and undercover probes without clearance from
headquarters.

The guidelines are an outgrowth of privacy laws that prohibit the government
from collecting information except for law enforcement purposes. In the
past, the government developed information on specific cases but now needs
broader intelligence to prevent terrorist acts.

© 2002 The Washington Post Company

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Tied to your PC? Cut Loose and
Stay connected with Yahoo! Mobile
http://us.click.yahoo.com/QBCcSD/o1CEAA/sXBHAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2003-08-24 02:46:32 PDT