[iwar] [fc:US.DoD.Seeks.C2.System.For.Joint.Task.Forces]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2002-07-03 23:10:47


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-4944-1025763028-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 03 Jul 2002 23:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 10741 invoked by uid 510); 4 Jul 2002 06:10:07 -0000
Received: from n38.grp.scd.yahoo.com (66.218.66.106) by all.net with SMTP; 4 Jul 2002 06:10:07 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-4944-1025763028-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com
Received: from [66.218.66.95] by n38.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Jul 2002 06:10:28 -0000
X-Sender: fc@red.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 4 Jul 2002 06:10:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 3750 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2002 06:10:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 4 Jul 2002 06:10:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO red.all.net) (12.232.72.152) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Jul 2002 06:10:27 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by red.all.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id g646Amq27401 for iwar@onelist.com; Wed, 3 Jul 2002 23:10:48 -0700
Message-Id: <200207040610.g646Amq27401@red.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 23:10:47 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [iwar] [fc:US.DoD.Seeks.C2.System.For.Joint.Task.Forces]
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=DIFFERENT_REPLY_TO version=2.20
X-Spam-Level: 

Jane's Defence Weekly
July 3, 2002
US DoD Seeks C2 System For Joint Task Forces 
By Kim Burger, JDW Staff Reporter, Washington DC 
The US Department of Defense (DoD) has begun a joint programme for
developing and producing a command and control (C2) system that would be
used by joint task forces and easily deployed worldwide. 
Senior officials at the DoD have been interested in pursuing such a
programme to close a shortfall in joint task force operations. There is
currently no standardised package for deployment, and C2 capabilities are
assembled using existing service systems, many of them unable to
interoperate. 
The US Navy, which has already begun work on a sea-based C2 centre, has been
designated to lead the effort, and work is under way to develop
requirements. The programme is budgeted at $460.2 million until Fiscal Year
2008 (FY08) and it is expected to progress from development to acquisition
in FY03. 
"We think we have a way to fix the joint warfighting, at least in the near
term," said Lt Gen Joseph Kellogg, director for command, control,
communications and computer ( C4) systems for the Joint Staff. Improving
interoperability among C4 capabilities is viewed as giving the DoD "the
biggest bang for the buck," Gen Kellogg added. 
Plans include building a hardware and software suite to be fielded to
standing joint task force headquarters that are to be established at the
five unified combatant commands by 2005 (Jane's Defence Weekly 27 February).
The concept will be studied in the upcoming Exercise 'Millennium Challenge
02' sponsored by the US Joint Forces Command (USJFCOM). 
The Deployable Joint C2 suite will include collaborative planning, including
secure video teleconferencing, and other capabilities to enable a
headquarters to quickly exchange data and communicate, said Chris Shepherd,
chief of strategic communications in the USJFCOM Joint Experimentation
Directorate. "The key difference will be how it deals with information." 
The centres will be sea- and land-based, and built on existing military C2
capabilities, like the Global Command and Control System. They will go
beyond the capability of a forward-deployed headquarters established by the
US Central Command. 
Decision-making tools, en-route mission planning and an initial entry
capability are envisioned. The DoD has yet to determine whether the centres
will be kept in tents or trailers, or mounted on platforms.

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Will You Find True Love?
Will You Meet the One?
Free Love Reading by phone!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/ztNCyD/zDLEAA/Ey.GAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2002-10-01 06:44:31 PDT