[iwar] [fc:Coup.De.Crawford]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2002-08-24 08:03:34


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-5238-1030201398-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Sat, 24 Aug 2002 08:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 17214 invoked by uid 510); 24 Aug 2002 15:01:35 -0000
Received: from n40.grp.scd.yahoo.com (66.218.66.108) by all.net with SMTP; 24 Aug 2002 15:01:35 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-5238-1030201398-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com
Received: from [66.218.67.193] by n40.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Aug 2002 15:03:19 -0000
X-Sender: fc@red.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_0_1); 24 Aug 2002 15:03:18 -0000
Received: (qmail 71113 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2002 15:03:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 24 Aug 2002 15:03:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO red.all.net) (12.232.72.152) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Aug 2002 15:03:18 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by red.all.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id g7OF3YV08326 for iwar@onelist.com; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 08:03:34 -0700
Message-Id: <200208241503.g7OF3YV08326@red.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 08:03:34 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [iwar] [fc:Coup.De.Crawford]
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=DIFFERENT_REPLY_TO version=2.20
X-Spam-Level: 

Coup De Crawford
By Maureen Dowd
New York Times | Opinion

Wednesday, 21 August, 2002

WASHINGTON -- The plotters are meeting down at the Ponderosa today.

They waited to huddle in Crawford until the flower child Colin Powell had
gone up to the Hamptons, ensconced with the white-wine-swilling toffs
scorned by the president.

With the diffident general brunching with the Dean &amp; DeLuca set, Cheney,
Rummy, Condi and W. can get down to bidness on the ranch, scheming to smoke
Saddam.

We used to worry about a military coup against civilian authority. Now we
worry about a civilian coup against military authority.

It's the reverse of the classic movie "Seven Days in May," about gung-ho
generals trying to wrest power from an "appeasing" president. In "Thirty-One
Days in August," gung-ho presidential advisers try to wrest power away from
"appeasing" generals.

In the 1964 movie, the generals' code for their military coup was a bet on
the Preakness. In the 2002 version, W. signaled his civilian coup by telling
an A.P. reporter his vacation reading was "Supreme Command," a new book by
Eliot A. Cohen, a conservative who favors ousting Saddam. In his book, Mr.
Cohen attacks the Powell Doctrine and argues that civilian leaders should
not defer to "the fundamental caution" of whiny generals on grand strategy
or use of force.

Tired of the inhibitions of the retired generals -- Mr. Powell, Brent
Scowcroft and Wesley Clark -- and unretired generals in the Joint Chiefs;
tired of the whisper campaigns in the hallways of the Pentagon and State
Department that a rush to war in Iraq will weaken America's war on terror;
tired of Republican resistance on the Hill -- the hawks flew to Texas to
strut their hawkishness.

The White House denied that the president was gathering his war council to
talk about war, to figure out when and how to employ all the hardware that's
been pre-positioned in Saddam's neighborhood.

After all, they pointed out, Gen. Tommy Franks isn't coming. And General
Powell isn't coming. A spokesman for Mr. Powell said he wasn't going because
it was a meeting about the military budget.

Never mind that the military budget is money that may level Iraq.

Ari Fleischer said the meeting was about military "transformation." Yeah.
They're going to transform Baghdad into "Hey, dad, that dude is history."

There were a few token uniforms at the coup kaffeeklatsch. But except for
Rummy, the Whack-Iraq tribe -- including W., Cheney, Condi, Paul Wolfowitz
and Richard Perle -- have scant backgrounds in the military, as their
military critics mutter.

The military types in the Pesky Questions tribe fret that it would be
smarter to go after the low-hanging fruit in the war on terror first --
Sudan, Somalia, Yemen, the Philippines, Indonesia, Colombia. They worry that
the Whack-Iraq'ers are too sanguine that our new weapons or a Special Forces
option will prevent Saddam from lobbing his chemical weapons at our men and
women in uniform. They fear that Rummy's belief that America can go in
light, fast and easy is futuristic nonsense.

But the Cheney-Rummy-Condi Axis of Anti-Evil believes in unilateralism so
fervently that it is prepared to proceed unilaterally without its own
military. If the Pentagon is not prepared to get with the program, they can
always parachute Wolfowitz into Baghdad with a license to kill.

Cheney &amp; Co. are clearly regrouping to catch the patriotic wave of the 9/11
anniversary, drawing fresh momentum for pre-empting terror in the Middle
East.

But they're not being smart by being secret. They have the conspiratorial
air of embattled sectarians, of a besieged cult, treating skeptics as
appeasers and legitimate questions as failures of patriotism. They are in
exclusive possession of the truth and the whole world is against them.

They have forgotten that planning a war is not justifying a war. The plans
must be covert but the justifications must be overt.

The hawks offer a potpourri of reasons for war, but they don't have the time
or the patience to persuade the American public that it really matters.

If the Iraqi danger is as large and clear as they say it is, their
explanations should also be large and clear.

The problem with the Bush administration is that its bully pulpit is all
bully and no pulpit.

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
4 DVDs Free +s&p Join Now
http://us.click.yahoo.com/pt6YBB/NXiEAA/mG3HAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2002-10-01 06:44:32 PDT