From: redteam@all.net Reply-to: redteam@all.net Organization: Red Team Mailing List Subject: RedTeam Mailing List 1998-10-26
--------------------------------------------- [Thought this might interest some - FC] From: anonymous Subject: MS, Firewalls and NT security. Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 17:48:49 -0800 I haven't been able to get to comp.risks because it was censored by Win98 as a valid usnet group... I just told Peter to ad me to the list again. I decided to go through the archives. This issue with the firewall is very interesting. I was wondering why with maximum security I was able to access these Channel sites that came with Win98 such as the WB site that runs a very complex VBScript and one of the other ones that was running a Java script like you said. They must have them listed somewhere in their system as you pointed out. I read your "How to bypass those pesky firewalls" today. I went to the site http://umweb2.unitedmedia.com/ and it didn't flag the JAVA at all. Now I'm wondering if Microosft has done something to remove my security options. As for the guy named Ed Curry. I read an article at http://www.zdnet.com/windows/wpro/9810/security_lockdown_dod.html NT Systems May Not Be Locked by Mary Jo Foley, Sm@rt Reseller Ed Curry is a man on a mission. Curry says he is out to warn the government that Windows NT is not secure, and will soon meet with the Secretary of Defense staff. Microsoft Corp. says he is on a personal vendetta against the company. They have always said the same thing about me too. They defamed me so bad that I was under investigation for breaking into the Federal Building at one time. It turned out to be all made up because they knew who I was. I also found out that my FBI kept record was modified too. They went after my medical records, credit cards and even my kids. The GSA Policeman was pretty shaken by the whole mess. There are people in Microsoft that don't even consider what they are doing. I had thousands taken against my credit cards and the insurance refused to pay. Some of the charges were to bogus companies too. I could get any information from the credit card people. Curry had a meeting about the NT security issue with the top of the DOD on Oct. 14th. I've been through the same kind of thing that he is taking about. I'm desperate to find his e-mail address and his contacts so he can pass what I'm sending to you on. I've been testing Win98 for weeks. I'm retired complements of Microsoft--they assaulted me on the job and I ended up with a handicap due to a spinal injury. Then they black balled me because they didn't like the fact that I said bad things about them--this is because I reported what they did to me to Gates injury for attempting to report bugs. This is why I don't post to risk list. You go to the FBI and they do nothing. I've not seen my children in three years because of these crazy people. One guy had a drive by shooting at his house. Another guy was shot coming out of Midnight Mass on Christmas many years ago. When they went after me, I started hearing all kinds of horror stories. One guy recently told me he was almost fried from the company when they found him documenting what we now know is the undocumented code in about Win 98 development about certain header files they didn't want documented. So we DO have a lot of undocumented code in Win 98! I usually pass things on to people who may be interested in the subject. I've had 4 web sites censored after their attorneys threatened my ISP. My last two sites had the Desk Top 4 military contract on it and a lot about security or the lack of it. It was all on Zenith machines so don't think the Government uses the best. The government goes with the lowest bidder, not the best! This is how NT took out the Novell servers it was cheaper. If you've been involved with Microsoft the way I have, you develop a six sense about them. Win98's file structure design is a major issue. I was testing Outlook Express with background sounds and wanted to see how they were sending them. I couldn't find the folders... So I did a search in DOS and found them in a sub directory of the Windows Dir.--the worse place to have them. So I attempted to move my folder. NO can do... (Perhaps it's possible during setup.) It makes no sense to have them there. There are all kinds of routines that can be run that go into the Windows directory. If you know how to access the API in windows and make calls to their DLLs you can really do just about whatever you want. So I reported it to Gates. In about a week they had a patch for one of the VBScripts calls but it's not enough. I know there is other stuff out there that can be done. My very first concern with VBScript is the ability to write your own object controls that access the DLLs. Patching one control doesn't prevent someone from writing another.:-) I'm constantly getting popped onto MSN or Microsoft.com for technical support. Because I'm a person of interest I was not allowing cookies and was trying to keep my identification concealed. On one occassion some smart guy grabbed part of my licensing information from my computer and posted it in a page as a greeting! I am not the right person to greet. So I copied that and reported it to Gates also! In the patch it said that only a hostile site can cause a problem with file access. Microsoft has both the motivation and arrogance to spy on just about anyone. It's the kind of thing you hear people brag about inside the company in the lunch rooms. :-) I'm 47 and know what they do over there. I once jokingly wrote to Gates and said that if they were going to do illegal things they shouldn't brag about it openly! The security at Microsoft is really bad so it's not unusual for a contractor to walk out the door with header files to the undocumented code in Windows. I know it's out there. And given the way Microsoft treats their contractor, I'm sure that some are using it to get back at them.:-) They are in a constant state of terror because of all the hacking that goes on.:-) I was working with Microsoft military and government OEMs as a systems engineer. The licensing number on their products can identify the OEM contract and that means that they know if someone is the military or working in the government. So if you log onto Microsoft's site, they grab your license and notice you are of interest. Then they can also go and grab your e-mail very quickly because they know the path. I was pretty sure that some of the leaks from DC were coming from such back door operations. I wonder if these folks would be so happy if they found out that Microsoft had the ability to read their e-mail? I asked one of my engineer friends who quite MS as a multimillionaire how come Microsoft could fix these security problems and other bugs so fast. He said they most likely had the code just sitting there for the fix and someone was told not to fix it by management. Go figure. He said that a lot of the engineers are upset about this kind of thing. According to him they have all kinds of tricky stuff and some of them use it in-house to spy. A lot of the contractor say the same thing. A few years ago someone sent e-mail in Gates' name on April Fools giving everyone the day off just to let him know he wasn't in charge anymore. The pie he was hit with was done by his own people in sales. Any one who has posted a negative about MS on the Internet should really watch what their e-mail is doing when they go to MS's site or some of these site run by their agents or contractors. NT was the only server the military was allowed to buy in the Desk Top 4 contract in 1994. It was so bad that one of the government sales reps at DEC told me that NASA put together a contract for Novell Servers and the military was then allowed to buy of it because the security issue was so bad in NT. What bothers me is that their security is still bad. I warned Gates that if he didn't fix the security in NT and Windows he would loose his contracts. I've heard that is just about what is going to happen. Neumann wants me to write a book.:-) Microsoft make about 40% of their profits from the government contracts. They use to make joke about ripping off the OEMs so bad. The OEM contracts require that the OEM make any manuals and provide developer support. They even have to sell the contracts. In my license it said that I had three months of free support from them. But when I called I was refused support and told to call HP. Tantum and others are knocking at the governments door. They hate me at Microsoft because Gates always checks out anything I write to him about because I'm a women and he had a thing for me once. More like an obsession. From what I can tell here locally, Ballmer is stalling NT and Gates is digging through code again... I think this is really funny. And we now have a local union enrolling Microsoft's. So they have some real interesting things happening. I copied this because I figured it would disappear quickly from their web and it did. So I'm trying to get it distributed. Show this to your bosses and explain the e-mail issue. You may want to consider a different e-mail package. Here the description of the post: Microsoft Security Bulletin (MS98-015) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Update available for "Untrusted Scripted Paste" Issue in Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.01 Originally Posted: October 16, 1998 Last Revised: October 16, 1998 Summary Microsoft has released a patch that fixes a vulnerability involving scripted pastes that has been discovered with Internet Explorer 4.01 on Win32 and Win16 platforms. The vulnerability could make it possible for a malicious hacker to create a web site that, when visited, is able to use script to read a file on the user's system. The file must be in a location known to the malicious hacker. This has also been referred to as the "Cuartango" vulnerability. Microsoft highly recommends that users that have affected software installed on their systems should download and install the available patch as soon as possible. Issue The "Untrusted Scripted Paste" issue involves a vulnerability in Internet Explorer that could allow a malicious hacker to circumvent certain Internet Explorer security safeguards. This vulnerability makes it possible for a malicious Web site operator to read the contents of a file on the user's computer if the hacker knows the exact name and path of the targeted file. This could also be used to view the contents of a file on the user's network to which the user has access, and whose direct path name is known by the attacker. The nature of this problem is that a script is able to use the Document.ExecCommand function to paste a filename into the file upload intrinsic control, which should only be possible by explicit user action. As a result, a subsequent form submission could send the file to a remote web site unbeknownst to the user if the user has disabled the default warning that is displayed when submitting unencrypted forms (see "Administrative Workaround" below for information on re-enabling this functionality). While there have not been any reports of customers being adversely affected by these problems, Microsoft is releasing a patch to address any risks posed by this issue. Affected Software Versions Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.01 and 4.01 SP1 on Windows NT 4.0, Windows 95 Microsoft Windows 98, with integrated Internet Explorer Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.01 for Windows 3.1 and Windows NT 3.51 This vulnerability could also affect software that uses HTML functionality provided by Internet Explorer, even if Internet Explorer is not used as your default browser. All customers that have affected versions of Internet Explorer on their systems should install this patch, whether or not they use Internet Explorer for web browsing. This vulnerability does not affect Internet Explorer 3.x or 4.0 on any platform. This does not affect any Macintosh or UNIX versions of Internet Explorer. What Microsoft is Doing On October 16th Microsoft released a patch that fixes the problem identified. This patch is available for download from the sites listed below. Microsoft has sent this security bulletin to customers subscribing to the Microsoft Product Security Notification Service (see http://www.microsoft.com/security/bulletin.htm for more information about this free customer service). Microsoft has published the following Knowledge Base (KB) articles on this issue: Microsoft Knowledge Base (KB) article Q169245, Update available for "Untrusted Scripted Paste" Issue http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q169/2/45.asp (Note: It might take 24 hours from the original posting of this bulletin for the KB article to be visible in the Web-based Knowledge Base.) What customers should do Microsoft highly recommends that users that have affected software installed on their systems should download and install the available patch as soon as possible. Complete URLs for each affected software version is given below. Windows 98 Windows 98 customers can obtain the patch using Windows Update. To obtain this patch using Windows Update, launch Windows Update from the Windows Start Menu and click "Product Updates." When prompted, select 'Yes' to allow Windows Update to determine whether this patch and other updates are needed by your computer. If your computer does need this patch, you will find it listed under the "Critical Updates" section of the page. Internet Explorer 4.01 Customers using Internet Explorer 4.01 can obtain the patch from the Internet Explorer Security web site, http://www.microsoft.com/ie/security/paste.htm Administrative workaround Microsoft strongly encourages customers to apply the patch. However, there are additional actions that can be taken to ensure safe computing: If the user has disabled the default warning that is displayed when submitting unencrypted forms, re-enabling this feature can provide additional protection. This warning prompt makes sure users are aware if a script attempts to submit data using forms. Users should be cautious if they see this warning when browsing and have not actually chosen to submit any data. To turn on this prompt: >From Internet Explorer, choose "Internet Options" form the "View" menu. Click on the tab labeled "Security". Click on "Internet Zone", then click "Customize Settings". Scroll to "Submit non-encrypted form data" and click on "Prompt" (or "Disable" if you prefer). These same procedures should be followed for the "Restricted Sites" Zone. Additionally, users who cannot apply the patch immediately can disable Active Scripting technologies in Internet Explorer to protect themselves from this issue. Customers can use the Zones security feature in Internet Explorer 4 to disable Active Scripting (VBScript and JScript) in untrusted or unknown Internet sites, while still permitting known and trusted sites that use JScript and VBScript to work properly. To turn off Active Scripting for the "Internet" Zone: >From Internet Explorer, choose "Internet Options" from the "View" menu. Click on the tab labeled "Security". Click on "Internet Zone", then click "Customize Settings". Scroll to the bottom of the list and click on "Disable" under the "Active Scripting" setting. These same procedures should be followed for the "Restricted Sites" Zone. Sites that are trusted to use JScript and VBScript can be added to the Trusted Zones list. For more information on using Zones, please see the Online Help included with Internet Explorer. More Information Please see the following references for more information related to this issue. Microsoft Security Bulletin MS98-015, Update available for "Untrusted Scripted Paste" Issue in Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.01, (the Web posted version of this bulletin), http://www.microsoft.com/security/bulletins/ms98-015.htm Microsoft Knowledge Base (KB) article Q169245, Update available for "Untrusted Scripted Paste" Issue http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q169/2/45.asp (Note: It might take 24 hours from the original posting of this bulletin for the KB article to be visible in the Web-based Knowledge Base.) Obtaining Support on this Issue This is a supported patch for Internet Explorer. If you have problems installing this patch or require technical assistance with this patch, please contact Microsoft Technical Support. For information on contacting Microsoft Technical Support, please see http://support.microsoft.com/support/contact/default.asp Acknowledgements This bug was first reported by Juan Carlos Garcia Cuartango from Spain. Revisions October 16, 1998: Bulletin Created For additional security-related information about Microsoft products, please visit http://www.microsoft.com/security ---------------------------------------------