Re: [iwar] Digest Number 256


From: Tony Bartoletti
From: azb@llnl.gov
To: iwar@egroups.com

Mon, 23 Oct 2000 15:26:29 -0700


fc  Mon Oct 23 18:02:27 2000
Received: from 207.222.214.225
	by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0)
	for fc@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 23 Oct 2000 18:02:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by multi33.netcomi.com for fc
 (with Netcom Interactive pop3d (v1.21.1 1998/05/07) Tue Oct 24 00:58:35 2000)
X-From_: sentto-279987-562-972339247-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com  Mon Oct 23 17:14:10 2000
Received: from hm.egroups.com (hm.egroups.com [208.50.99.198]) by multi33.netcomi.com (8.8.5/8.7.4) with SMTP id RAA09527 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 17:14:10 -0500
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-562-972339247-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.4.52] by hm.egroups.com with NNFMP; 23 Oct 2000 22:14:05 -0000
X-Sender: azb@llnl.gov
X-Apparently-To: iwar@egroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-6_1_0); 23 Oct 2000 22:14:04 -0000
Received: (qmail 3179 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2000 22:14:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 23 Oct 2000 22:14:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO poptop.llnl.gov) (128.115.41.70) by mta1 with SMTP; 23 Oct 2000 22:14:01 -0000
Received: from catalyst (catalyst.llnl.gov [128.115.222.68]) by poptop.llnl.gov (8.8.8/LLNL-3.0.2/pop.llnl.gov-5.1) with ESMTP id PAA25677 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 15:13:12 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <4.2.2.20001023152404.00ba65c0@poptop.llnl.gov>
X-Sender: e048786@poptop.llnl.gov
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 
To: iwar@egroups.com
From: Tony Bartoletti 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: list iwar@egroups.com; contact iwar-owner@egroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@egroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: 
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 15:26:29 -0700
Reply-To: iwar@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [iwar] Digest Number 256
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

(Resent -- Attempting to fix horrific linewrapping!  Dumb Computers! ;) 
___tony___


>Quote from [http://www.nukefix.org/forecast.html]
>"Specifically, the book introduces the reader to the *Formula k* model 
>which seeks to show how long nuclear peace would tend to continue at 
>different levels of proliferation and  peacefulness.
>
>"This simple mathematical method illustrates levels of peacefulness 
>required to sustain peace for designated periods, and purports to predict 
>conventional warfare with considerable accuracy. Though some theorists may 
>object to the use of mathematical models, Jeanes' method is highly 
>original and attractive. His central argument is that for any given 
>probability of a nuclear war per year, there is an expected time span 
>until it occurs. Thus. the longer we wait without creating a safer world, 
>the more likely it is that nuclear warfare will occur. A solid empirical 
>foundation and a comparative platform have been built on the extensive 
>analysis of numerous conventional wars since 1820."

Without attempting to address the rigor of the mathematical models, I think 
that these results are largely (uncommon!) common sense.  Think of 20 year 
flood tables, and 50 year flood tables, and 100 year flood tables.  The 
recognition that there are "bigger ones out there" is almost inescapable, 
and failure to undertake continual efforts to curtail, divert or withstand 
an ever-greater onslaught is to court an
eventual disaster.

This thread began when Ozair Rasheed asked why the lesser-developed 
countries (LDCs) become the focus of our fears with regard to 
proliferation. The answer that was given is valid (lower expectation on 
"command and control") but could be further multiplied when considering yet 
smaller "cells" and even individuals.  Timothy McVeigh (sp?) we believe, 
took down a federal building with a rented van and fertilizer.

Increasingly, protective measures need to focus upon motivations, just as 
preventative medicine is likely more effective than 
disease-treatment.  Yes, there are unreasonable individuals out there, but 
when there are organized groups willing to take suicidal measures to seek 
your destruction, you cannot avoid the question "what have I done to bring 
this on" and plan forever that the playing field favors your team.  Serious 
measures to reduce tensions must come into play, and a willingness to yield 
to a global consensus of "justice" is a necessary component.

(IMHO! :)

___tony___






Tony Bartoletti 925-422-3881 
Information Operations, Warfare and Assurance Center
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Livermore, CA 94551-9900


-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9699/14/_/595019/_/972339247/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

------------------
http://all.net/