Antwort: [iwar] interesting pointer


From: Markus Spindler
From: Markus.Spindler@ascom.ch
To: iwar@yahoogroups.com

Tue, 6 Mar 2001 10:48:39 +0100


fc  Tue Mar  6 01:48:34 2001
Return-Path: 
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215
	by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0)
	for fc@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 06 Mar 2001 01:48:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 28016 invoked by uid 510); 6 Mar 2001 09:46:39 -0000
Received: from ei.egroups.com (64.211.240.237)
  by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 6 Mar 2001 09:46:39 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-1007-983872071-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.4.54] by ei.egroups.com with NNFMP; 06 Mar 2001 09:47:51 -0000
X-Sender: Markus.Spindler@ascom.ch
X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 6 Mar 2001 09:47:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 83208 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2001 09:47:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 6 Mar 2001 09:47:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ascomax.hasler.ascom.ch) (139.79.135.1) by mta2 with SMTP; 6 Mar 2001 09:47:50 -0000
Received: from srvmailgate1.hasler.ascom.ch (srvmailgate1.hasler.ascom.ch [139.79.135.89]) by ascomax.hasler.ascom.ch (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f269lmJ10064 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 10:47:48 +0100 (MET)
To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Message-ID: 
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on SrvMailGate1/Ascom(Release 5.0.5 |September 22, 2000) at 06.03.2001 10:47:47
X-Filter-Version: 1.2 (ascomax)
From: "Markus Spindler" 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: 
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 10:48:39 +0100
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Antwort: [iwar] interesting pointer
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


> and what he has arrived
> at may change some opinions among those
> who would hang the Captain of the USS
> Greenville before the investigation is complete.

don't think so.
this fish-trawler camouflage thing can probably be traced back
to Cleopatra or the Phoenicians. Everybody does it (wouldn't be
surprised to hear even of, say, mongolian "trawlers" of that kind),
everybody knows that everybody else does it,
and at the bottom line nobody really bothers.
Nowadays, you invite foreign officers to your armed forces' manoeuvres.
Short: It does not matter what the boat was doing there.
The only question is: Was it allowed to be there?
(If not, it should have been intercepted by US Navy
before the crah, anyway.)

But back to the captain:
Disregarding a red light they will take away my licence,
irrespective who I crashed into.
(at least here, excuse my eurocentristic viewpoint again.
I admit that I do not have the faintest idea what this
is like in the US)
Same rule applies to the captain, IMHO.
Don't get into the trap of perception managment of
guys like Morningstar, looking for cheap excuses.
Short: The only question is: Was he allowed to do that move or not?

Regards, Markus



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
Find software faster. Search more than 20,000
software solutions on KnowledgeStorm. Register
now and get started.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/ncHzAA/yMSCAA/7f4EAA/kzAVlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/