Re: Antwort: [iwar] interesting pointer
From: Fred Cohen
From: fc@all.net
To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 05:33:15 -0800 (PST)
fc Tue Mar 6 05:33:33 2001
Return-Path:
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0)
for fc@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 06 Mar 2001 05:33:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 24112 invoked by uid 510); 6 Mar 2001 13:32:04 -0000
Received: from hl.egroups.com (208.50.99.197)
by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 6 Mar 2001 13:32:04 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-1008-983885597-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.4.52] by hl.egroups.com with NNFMP; 06 Mar 2001 13:33:17 -0000
X-Sender: fc@all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 6 Mar 2001 13:33:16 -0000
Received: (qmail 28273 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2001 13:33:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 6 Mar 2001 13:33:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta1 with SMTP; 6 Mar 2001 13:33:16 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by all.net (8.9.3/8.7.3) id FAA21073 for iwar@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 05:33:16 -0800
Message-Id: <200103061333.FAA21073@all.net>
To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
In-Reply-To: from "Markus Spindler" at Mar 06, 2001 10:48:39 AM
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
From: Fred Cohen
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe:
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 05:33:15 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Antwort: [iwar] interesting pointer
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Per the message sent by Markus Spindler:
...
> Short: It does not matter what the boat was doing there.
> The only question is: Was it allowed to be there?
> (If not, it should have been intercepted by US Navy
> before the crah, anyway.)
I think you are right on this point. But it does matter if the boat
could not be detected - sort of.
According to the reports I have seen, the boat ran into the submarine -
not the other way around. So perhaps when you run into another ship's
side you are at fault? Except of course that in the ocean, it is the job
of the larger ship to get out of the way. But if you are cruising along
and someone else smashes into you, it seems to me to be their fault.
Isn't it 'outdriving your headlights' to go so fast that you can't stop
before you hit something?
> But back to the captain:
> Disregarding a red light they will take away my licence,
> irrespective who I crashed into.
Right. If they did not follow the rules and had a crash he will be
blamed. But I think he will be blamed anyway. This has to do with
politics, not seamanship. W has already said he is sorry.
FC
---
Fred Cohen at Sandia National Laboratories at tel:925-294-2087 fax:925-294-1225
Fred Cohen & Associates: http://all.net - fc@all.net - tel/fax:925-454-0171
Fred Cohen - Practitioner in Residence - The University of New Haven
This communication is confidential to the parties it is intended to serve.
PGP keys: https://all.net/pgpkeys.html - Have a great day!!!
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
Find software faster. Search more than 20,000
software solutions on KnowledgeStorm. Register
now and get started.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/ncHzAA/yMSCAA/7f4EAA/kzAVlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
------------------
http://all.net/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/