Return-Path: <sentto-279987-1110-986704799-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Sat, 07 Apr 2001 21:40:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 5725 invoked by uid 510); 8 Apr 2001 03:41:06 -0000 Received: from ei.egroups.com (64.211.240.237) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2001 03:41:06 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-1110-986704799-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.4.54] by ei.egroups.com with NNFMP; 08 Apr 2001 04:39:59 -0000 X-Sender: omicron@omicron.dyndns.org X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_1); 8 Apr 2001 04:39:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 7117 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2001 04:39:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 8 Apr 2001 04:39:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (61.1.145.131) by mta1 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2001 04:39:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 3430 invoked by uid 502); 6 Apr 2001 15:00:24 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Apr 2001 15:00:24 -0000 Sender: <omicron@cassandra.aphrodite.homeip.net> To: <iwar@yahoogroups.com> In-Reply-To: <006601c0be7d$95bec1f0$4b50b880@cm.deakin.edu.au> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0104062023480.2997-100000@cassandra.aphrodite.homeip.net> From: omicron <omicron@omicron.dyndns.org> Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 20:30:02 +0530 (IST) Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [iwar] Difference between IW and RA and Comp Sec etc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Vernon Stagg wrote: > Hi all, > > One of the problems I am facing during my research is a lot of the > traditional comp sci I am one... > people dont understand or disregard the issue of Information Warfare. There give us a chance. it is not as though it is as popular as a virus and read on... > also tends to be > similar apathy in the commercial arena with managers, execs, etc. managers usually don't go along well with the trailing edge of the technology :) > Most consider it another form of computer security or that a Risk Analysis > will fix > everything up. > i still consider it as a form of computer security. if not how do u counter it ? That's a practical question and i really don't care about which nations hate each other, and who is spying on whom and who wants to attack whom. How do u defend yourself ? > I was interested what some of the views from people here think to this - > agree/disagree? agree ( from practical point) disagree ( from a philosophical/theoritical point) > I personally disagree, and consider IW at a higher level where computer > security and RA > can be incorporated into the concept but are certainly very different > methods. I also > think that computer security and RA these days have simply been tweaked to > include a lot > of elements that fall outside their traditional scope, often with unwanted > or unexpected > results. > Back to definition : What do u think is iwar ? regards omicron ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~> Do you have 128-bit SSL encryption server security? Get VeriSign's FREE Guide, "Securing Your Web Site for Business." Get it now! http://us.click.yahoo.com/2cW4jC/c.WCAA/bT0EAA/kzAVlB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------_-> ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-06-30 21:44:07 PDT