Return-Path: <sentto-279987-1117-986816844-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 09 Apr 2001 04:48:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 16459 invoked by uid 510); 9 Apr 2001 10:48:28 -0000 Received: from hn.egroups.com (208.50.99.199) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2001 10:48:28 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-1117-986816844-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.4.53] by hn.egroups.com with NNFMP; 09 Apr 2001 11:47:24 -0000 X-Sender: fc@all.net X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_1); 9 Apr 2001 11:47:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 94055 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2001 11:47:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 9 Apr 2001 11:47:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta1 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2001 11:47:23 -0000 Received: (from fc@localhost) by all.net (8.9.3/8.7.3) id EAA09379 for iwar@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 04:47:22 -0700 Message-Id: <200104091147.EAA09379@all.net> To: iwar@yahoogroups.com In-Reply-To: <no.id> from "Riccardo Sibilia" at Apr 09, 2001 11:43:02 AM Organization: I'm not allowed to say X-Mailer: don't even ask X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net> Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 04:47:22 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [iwar] A question... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Most interested in more on this... Per the message sent by Riccardo Sibilia: > We distinguish 5 operation types in IW: (the same way you distinguish aerial > refueling, interdiction, etc. in air power) > [these are the result of our research here at IMS and in the "Swiss Crows" > (local AOC chapter) community] > disruption; > deception; > destruction; > public information management and > operational security measures. ... > As of psyops (for example), they can go in three distinct directions: > deception (desinformation, works with wrong and specially manipulated information), > public information management (works with true information that is used at the > right time, place, quality and quantity) or Is this "selective" information? If so, it is a form of deception, isn't it? > disruption (where one tryies to reduce the opponents or public attention to a > certain subject by "noise"). Isn't disruption in this case a form of deception? -- Fred Cohen at Sandia National Laboratories at tel:925-294-2087 fax:925-294-1225 Fred Cohen & Associates: http://all.net - fc@all.net - tel/fax:925-454-0171 Fred Cohen - Practitioner in Residence - The University of New Haven This communication is confidential to the parties it is intended to serve. PGP keys: https://all.net/pgpkeys.html - Have a great day!!! ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~> Secure your servers with 128-bit SSL encryption! Grab your copy of VeriSign's FREE Guide, "Securing Your Web site for Business." Get it now! http://us.click.yahoo.com/4cW4jC/e.WCAA/bT0EAA/kzAVlB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------_-> ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-06-30 21:44:07 PDT