Return-Path: <sentto-279987-1130-986945850-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 10 Apr 2001 16:38:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 7885 invoked by uid 510); 10 Apr 2001 22:38:32 -0000 Received: from ef.egroups.com (64.211.240.229) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 10 Apr 2001 22:38:32 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-1130-986945850-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.4.55] by ef.egroups.com with NNFMP; 10 Apr 2001 23:37:30 -0000 X-Sender: azb@llnl.gov X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_1); 10 Apr 2001 23:37:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 56911 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2001 23:37:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 10 Apr 2001 23:37:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp-2.llnl.gov) (128.115.250.82) by mta3 with SMTP; 11 Apr 2001 00:38:33 -0000 Received: from poptop.llnl.gov (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-2.llnl.gov (8.9.3/8.9.3/LLNL-gateway-1.0) with ESMTP id QAA07067 for <iwar@yahoogroups.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 16:37:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from catalyst.llnl.gov (catalyst.llnl.gov [128.115.222.68]) by poptop.llnl.gov (8.8.8/LLNL-3.0.2/pop.llnl.gov-5.1) with ESMTP id QAA29461 for <iwar@yahoogroups.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 16:37:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010410161449.00aff5f0@poptop.llnl.gov> X-Sender: e048786@poptop.llnl.gov X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 To: iwar@yahoogroups.com In-Reply-To: <200104102256.PAA26085@all.net> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010410151345.00c06b40@poptop.llnl.gov> From: Tony Bartoletti <azb@llnl.gov> Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 16:41:14 -0700 Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [iwar] Difference between IW and RA and Comp Sec etc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit At 03:56 PM 4/10/01 -0700, you wrote: > > How about "Computer Security involves local/defensive measures taken to > > address the safety of your information processing." > >Wrong words. Try proteciton - not security. Perhaps you are really saying that computer security is the reasonable assurance that your info-systems are "safe", derived from an ensemble of measures that might range from "protections" all the way through the threat of massive physical retaliation. I am hoping to define "computer security" (InfoSec*) a bit more tightly. What range of "protections" is limited to "computer" protections? What elements of computer security (InfoSec*) lie beyond mere protections? *NOTE: I know that "InfoSec" can involve being careful to whom you talk while on foreign travel, etc. But in the context of "Symbol Warfare", I am using InfoSec in the signal-processing sense. Is this wrong? ___tony___ Tony Bartoletti 925-422-3881 <azb@llnl.gov> Information Operations, Warfare and Assurance Center Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, CA 94551-9900 ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~> Secure your servers with 128-bit SSL encryption! Grab your copy of VeriSign's FREE Guide, "Securing Your Web site for Business." Get it now! http://us.click.yahoo.com/4cW4jC/e.WCAA/bT0EAA/kzAVlB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------_-> ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-06-30 21:44:08 PDT